Did Charlotte and Tiana ever experiment with each other?

According to a quick google search, the age of consent in Louisiana was 18 in the 1920s, it's actually been lowered to 17 since then.

Now what's the age of consent in Maldonia?

Huh, no shit? Thats actually kind of weird.

Attached: 1610141134851.gif (274x414, 1.32M)

Suffragette movement didn't just get the right for women to vote and prohibition passed, they also kicked the age of consent to 18 all over the country, before it was like 10 or something.

Of course, you can’t be this good a cook without trying out new things

Attached: tiana 2.jpg (1480x896, 159.48K)

The pillow shading on that cream is so cursed...

I think its powdered sugar

Princess and the Frog was a good movie with a good female main character. No idea why Disney seems to forget about her.

movie bombed. simple as.

But the movie was good

Attached: 1431486025866.jpg (473x480, 31.13K)

It didn't bomb. Just performed below expectations

released against Avatar

But Avatar sucked

user I'm about to blow your mind.
The general public has shit taste and giant movie corporations only really care about profits.

>Princess and the Frog performs below expectations and fails to revive hand drawn western cinema after a long hiatus that started in 2004
>HTTYD, despite being soulless shit, comes out only 3 months later and becomes a box office hit, resulting in an equally soulless media franchise
Why did it have to be like this ? Fuck How to Train Your Dragon. Tiana was miles better than one dinensional tough viking girl

Racism bad

Btw here is a cute adorable white girl who did nothing wrong the movie

Sharktalefaggot

PATF and HTTYD are superior to Sharktale tho

Attached: tiana__expanded__by_bootijuse_ddniccb-fullview.jpg (1600x1130, 109.46K)

Heck, forget Tiana. Lottie alone was a better character Astrid. Unlike Dreamworks, Disney actually ensures their characters are likeable before releasing a movie

But here's the thing : Princess and the Frog was a 2D movie only. It didn't include 3D glasses. HTTYD, on the other hand, was built around 3D technology, and since 3D glasses were all the rage back then ( mostly thanks to Avatar ) it resulted in HTTYD surpassing PatF at box office. Audiences are shallow

>No idea why Disney seems to forget about her
tiana's getting a disney+ show

granted, everyone is

I will defend the first movie as alright but the sequels are so fucking trash holy shit

Disney is a company built on pedophilia

I would, although I wouldn't have stop at "experiment", her loss if she didn't. I mean what's the point of a gal pal if there is no experiments, especially with a maid outfit.

Attached: Emmy girls.png (761x753, 952.6K)

They’re women in the 1920s, one of whom is from a working class background (Tiana). She would definitely not do any gay stuff, even if she really wanted to. Charlotte, maybe? I dunno what rich women do, sexually.

>TFW Chubby Tiana episode

Attached: de7lbl2-7a36f6e0-eae5-4e7a-b0dc-2d528c7123d0.jpg (2654x2261, 477.92K)

This
If it wasn't for the 3D spectacle it would have been remembered as another "wimpy kid has a crush on bland warrior girl, befriends magic creature gets dads respect and the girl knows of his existence".
Although I like that the first movie didn't have them hook up, which made sense as Astrid wasn't his love interest from the book, it was a pirate dragon trainer.

Also Heather x Astrid
because Hiccup is such a wet blanket, even after he started training dragons.

Yes, and it was probably an order from her to her slave.

>3D
HTTYD was a gimmicky movie built around 3D technology. Just like that Zemeckis' Christmas Carol uncanny valley adaptation released around the same time. Story and characters were not Dreamworks or Zemeckis' biggest priority when making them

Attached: how_to_train_your_dragon_ver6.jpg (507x755, 79.79K)

Sir this is a PATF thread. Take your seething somewhere else.

>Monsters vs Aliens, Up, Ice Age 3, Cloudy with Meatballs and Christmas Carol included 3D glasses and were box office hits
>Princess and the Frog and Astro Boy were 2D only, so they performed below expectations
3D glasses were a big draw for audiences back in 2009 ( and 2010 as well )

>astro boy
I think youre a little confused mate

Attached: tilezoom.jpg (1500x844, 118.12K)

What are the incest rates in Louisiana... asking for a friend

Attached: charlotte-la-bouff-2_01BD8RZJ5GGTZXEV1ZYQYX2ME4.1024x0.jpg (1000x1500, 161.15K)

It's western animation, since it was directed by Flushed Away director and produced / helmed by Dreamworks people

Rarely has porn. Fucking incest shit

In any case, my point is that only animation films with 3D technology made a profit back then. Of course, releasing PatF next to Avatar was a bad idea, but it even if it was released earlier, it would've still underperformed because the lack of 3D technology. 2011's Winnie the Pooh also didn't incude 3D glasses, and it also flopped

I consider the Astroboy movie to be partially Dreamworks, given all of the important people behind it ( director, producers, production designer, art director, character designer, animation director, head of character animation ) came straight out of Dreamworks. It belongs in Dab Forums

Attached: Screenshot_20210219-142815.png (720x1280, 151.05K)

what was he giving her?

>PatF was released along Avatar
>Winnie the Pooh was released along Harry Potter's final installment
>Neither film included 3D glasses, which could've helped to attract more audiences
Was Disney deliberately trying to sabotage their hand drawn department or what ?

A delicious shrimp and oyster po' boy