Based or cringe

Attached: Screenshot_20210220-011146_Gallery.jpg (1080x2400, 239.96K)

>tattoos
>a gay one at that
Cringe, painfully

Attached: 788860A4-68AB-4180-8CB3-34E03DF4E4AD.jpg (744x875, 240.32K)

That tatoo would only look good in someone called "Angel" probably a latino

To me it's cool because it sort of mimics the anatomy of what a wing would actually be, or what it is on birds anyway.

You will regret this so much past the age of 22

conceptually cringe, obvious, meaningless, etc
but looks cool as a tattoo.

cringe

That will age badly.

The golden rule for tattoos is they should be relatively simple and bold. Traditional style tattoos for example, or bold textual stuff, or symbols. Those are the tattoos that will age best and still look decent even when you're 80.

These days people go for "cleaner" tattoos, mostly traces or abstract things. They age better and look great on many places.

does it really matter what I think?

insanely cringe

Yo if this is a real tattoo you just got then I don't even know what to say.

cringe
girly tattoo

decent. will he get the other shoulder?

what is with the autism/retardation/faggotry of this board? I don't like tattoos but OP pic is just a normal shoulder tat

“I’m an angel so deep much meaning”

The given possible answers to the question was polar opposites.

It seems like you are implying that there could only be one answer.

eh, fuck them I like it. I dated a tattoo artist for years, I wouldn't let her give me one because I couldn't think of anything meaningful. When I finally thought of something it's small, and kinda cool... but it doesn't mean shit to anyone and she was talented af, I shoulda gotten something cool.

If it looks cool, do it.

Based on cringe

it's fine

What are traditionally style tattoos like?