why not a picture of snow
or texas why a nake girl?
Can any sciencefags explain why people are calling the Texas blizzard a result of global warming...
Hunter Morales
Colton Cooper
fpbp, it's that simple
Nathaniel Williams
Earth warms, ice caps melt, cold water introduced into ocean currents, colder currents create frigid weather.
Aaron Lee
fpbp. It's a clarion call to the pseudo-intellectuals to start publishing more "peer-reviewed" B.S.
Leo Hall
A giant warm chunk of air pushed its way into the arctic, and caused the cold air to end up in areas that it's not supposed to be.
Austin Butler
Melting ice caps. Cold water moves from melted ice moves. Cools somewhere. Then the air urrents become cold as well, bringing polar climate to some distant land. But after a while, the cold goes away. That's when INTENSE heat begins in some places. Expect once green lands to become deserts, while some deserts may green for a while. Eventually, everywhere will become hotter. This has nothing to do with global warming, but everything to do with the sun.
Aaron Roberts
Blizzard of 1873 swept through and wiped out a lot of cattle heards back then. Texas and the southern plains in general regularly have cold events every 15-20 years. Texas power isn't regulated, so they saved bucks by not insulating anything for cold. That is now biting them in the ass. Then green fags rammed solar and wind down throats, which work well in regular weather but suck balls in bad weather. Battery tech also sucks absolute balls in cold weather, and you can expect less than 50% of what you had after it freezes.
Jack Rodriguez
>muh global warming
>no it's muh climate change now
These goalpost moving kikes are never right and never wrong they just change their definitions as they see fit
Josiah Clark
More extreme weather events more often is the prediction. It's not really scientific to assume all unusual weather is linked to climate change, but the blizzard does align so I can understand how brainlets might get excited.
And no, the right has continues to call it global warming despite the the name changing to climate change more than a decade ago so they can go "huhuhuhuh it cold so how can globe be getting warmer hhahhaha I am very smart" every time, or "WOW they keep hanging the definition to make it fit! Trust the science huh? can you imagine if science was a process of self frequent repeated self correction as our understanding grows and definitions become more precise! haha, I don't think so dipshit!" It's kinda infuriating, especially when there are actual criticisms to be made about climate change fear mongering and valid criticisms of the science.
Jason Mitchell
>change definition once
>omg! is an atom a large solid ball of positive charges with electrons embedded in it or is it a dense nucleus of neutrons and protons surrounded by electron shells of discrete energy levels! Fucking jews keep changing the definition! I can't keep up, how is that even scientific?