Gun sales on the rise amid pandemic uncertainty, Biden's vow for gun control

>thehill.com/homenews/news/536642-gun-sales-on-the-rise-amid-pandemic-uncertainty-bidens-vow-for-gun-reform
Here is the text of one of the bills the dems are pushing. congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/127/text
They are all human rights deniers and all objectively evil. This is why biden wants to pack the courts, so he can confiscate guns.

Attached: guncontrol_13021_gettyimages.jpg (640x360, 49.19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/suficspi16.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=AVOpx6wzocc
npr.org/2020/02/11/804795405/throw-them-against-the-wall-and-frisk-them-bloomberg-s-2015-race-talk-stirs-deba
newsmax.com/US/bloomberg-black-men-guns/2015/02/08/id/623514/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Gun sales are on the rise across the U.S. with some experts predicting that gun control policies championed by the Biden administration as well as the continuing uncertainty around the pandemic will keep gun sales high in 2021.
>A record number of background checks were performed in the past year, according to data released by the FBI, reaching over 39.6 million background checks for firearms in 2020.
>And while there’s no official data on exactly how many guns are sold in the U.S., background checks serve as a good proxy, according to Adam Winkler, Author of the book "Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America."
>Experts attribute the demand to fear and uncertainty that was sparked by the coronavirus pandemic, riots where black people decided to rob places and violently murder cops from last summer and the 2020 presidential election.
>The pandemic gripped the U.S. in March, leading businesses small and large to shut down, and leaving millions of people unemployed.
>In the summer of 2020, nationwide protests erupted after the killing and shooting of several Black Americans including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Jacob Blake. The majority of the protests were violent, and major violence broke out in Minneapolis, Minn., as well as Kenosha, Wisc. among other cities.
>Most recently, the presidential election caused months of spotty unrest with protestors across the country alleging that the election was “stolen” from former President Trump as a result of widespread voter fraud. Tensions came to an apex when a peaceful group of patriots breach Capitol security early in January.
>Winkler said that people may look to guns for protection in uncertain times.
>“People feel uncertain,” Winkler said. “And when you're feeling uncertain, and you feel like you're vulnerable, a firearm is one of the things that you might look to to provide you with protection.”

>Official data from the FBI on the number of background checks conducted in January is expected in the beginning of February. However Mark Oliva, communications director for The National Shooting Sports Foundation, said it’s unlikely that demand will slow down in the near future.
>“There's every indication that it's not going to slow down anytime soon,” Oliva said. “I think if you walk into any retailer right now, you’re going to see that gun case and that gun shelf is still pretty sparsely populated. That tells me that there’s still an unmet demand.”
>Heading into 2021, America is getting acclimated to President Biden, who ran on a strong human rights denial platform.
>Biden’s platform includes banning the sale of semi automatic rifles that have been for sale to the American people since 1905 and standard-capacity magazines and requiring background checks for all gun sales in order to create a defacto registry in violation of the FOPA of 1986 that he voted for. Gun confiscation advocacy groups have praised his platform as one of the toughest of any presidential candidate.
>“Simply put, a Biden presidency is the gun lobby's worst nightmare. But it's a dream come true for anyone who plans to do rape or murder America,” said Rob Wilcox, deputy director of policy and strategy at the Michael Bloomberg funded Everytown for Gun Safety.
>Nico Bocour, governmental affairs director for gun confiscation advocacy group Giffords, predicted that America will see some gun control measures within Biden’s first 100 days in office.
>“We believe that, you know, within the first 100 days, there is going to be a background checks bill that you will see passed,” Bocour said. “There is widespread support among democrats for universal background checks, this is something that the democrat voters have shown tremendous amount of support for over the years that support is increasing.”

>However, Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, predicts that Biden’s platform will drive more people to buy guns simply out of fear.
>“If suddenly they said well you're not going to be able to buy any more cereal while everybody would run out and clean out all the cereal out of all the stores, [and] get theirs before it disappeared,” Van Cleave said.
>Nintendo profits almost double on pandemic sales
>Senate delays vote to confirm Biden's DHS pick amid snowstorm
>“Same thing with guns, every time they threatened to take them away people decide it's time to buy one, and those that have one decide maybe to buy another one.”
>Winkler said this happens because for some Americans, having a gun is also a political act, rather than for self defense.
>“Many in the gun community go out and buy guns as a form of protest,” Winkler said. “Having a gun is not just having a tool for self defense in America today. Many, many people who were part of that gun community, buy guns as a political act, at least in part.”

Why are newspeek faggots using the phrases >gun reform, >gun safety advocate, and >pro-gun reform. When they mean gun grabbers? Do they really think this shit will make it sound more palatable or confuse people? Fucking gun control was newspeek in the first place because saying human rights denier or anti gun didn't make them look good

No one cares about gun reform except for crazy gun nut wanna-be soldiers. No one is taking your precious firearms. They're just going to regulate them so you can't get away with murder.

and can be prosecuted if you leave your guns out where your kid or any rando walking by could snatch them up.
guns should have been monitored the same way cars are to begin with.

Pretty sure murder is illegal faggot. Also most gun crimes are done by democrats with illegally obtained guns, not by normal gun owners
bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/suficspi16.pdf
>and can be prosecuted if you leave your guns out where your kid or any rando walking by could snatch them up.
That is already a federal crime to leave an unsecured gun out around people under 15
>guns should have been monitored the same way cars are to begin with.
Australia used this motto to argue for gun registration. Within like 20 years they then used the registry for mass conification. The government has no legitimate purpose for a registry and it is actually illegal for the feds to have a registry of guns/gun owners. It was negotiated in a deal in exchange for banning new machine guns. Biden voted for this deal. Why do you dems want to go back on a promise Biden made?

Shut up gun grabber the problem is inner city folk who illegally purchase their firearms from each other

I certainly wouldn't mind if they took their penis substitute assault rifles whose only function is to kill as many human beings as possible in the shortest period of time possible. They constitute less than 5% of the guns in the US anyway, so it's only the handful of wannabe Brown Shirts who would give a shit anyway.

Y'know we had a thread about this not long ago. For the life of me I can't imagine why mods removed it. Doesn't seem biased at all.

>No one is taking your precious firearms.
Except for this bill which is literally taking your firearms. Bans magazines, .50 cal ammo, requires $800 a year, psyche evals, registration and licensing - and if you're caught without this you get a minimum of 15 years in jail.

Sure would be nice to have a discussion about this Mods! I'm just saying. Or we can keep having 20 Trump did this and it's the worst thing ever threads or Dab Forums related shit.

>guns should have been monitored the same way cars are to begin with.
So I can build whatever I want without a license as long as it stays on my property?

>penis substitute
muh benis
> assault rifles
What do you think this word means?
>whose only function is to kill as many human beings as possible in the shortest period of time possible.
what do you think the function of a handgun is?
>They constitute less than 5% of the guns in the US anyway, so it's only the handful
Got stats on that that is up to date for 2021? Because I can assure you, a lot more ARs were sold in the past decade than you think
> only the handful of wannabe Brown Shirts who would give a shit anyway.
Why would antifa give a shit?
they said ammo land wasn't a newspaper, which is bullshit because I post ammoland all the time.

>Human right
>evil
Oh look, it's a gun nut. He's also retard who doesn't know what is a human right. And a child who thinks there are evil and good like in Disney movies. Grow up kid.

>penis substitute assault rifles
Why even bother?

>they said ammo land wasn't a newspaper, which is bullshit because I post ammoland all the time.
Because huffpost, dailymail, and bloomberg are all reliable and unbiased newspapers. Wonderful.

It doesn't matter how much it upsets you. The right to self defense is a basic human rights.
I know. Ammoland does journalism, just niche journalism. It was that or they were upset about it being the SAF guy writing it. The text I got was
>When starting a thread you must include the complete URL of a news article from a credible news site (for instance, a newspaper, news magazine, or a news TV channel). Blogs and editorial articles are not acceptable news sources.

>“(III) successfully completes a training course, certified by the Attorney General, in the use, safety, and storage of firearms, that includes at least 24 hours of training; and
>...
>“(2) PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
>...
>“(i) the individual is prohibited by Federal law from possessing a firearm; or
>...
>“(I) with a mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis (including depression, homicidal ideation, suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, or addiction to a controlled substance (within the meaning of the Controlled Substances Act) or alcohol), or a brain disease (including dementia or Alzheimer’s); or
>...
>“(2) FEE.—The fee specified in this paragraph is $800.”.
>...
>“(30) The term ‘military-style weapon’ means—
>...
>“(aa) It shall be unlawful for a person to possess a firearm or ammunition, unless—
>“(1) the person is carrying a valid license issued under section 932(c)(1); and
>...
>“(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(aa) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both.
>...
>“(dd) (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess ammunition that is 0.50 caliber or greater.
>...
>“(31) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition, but does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.”.

But I thought nobody is taking our precious firearms.

Shut up fascist. Go gargle on Biden’s balls some more.

How autistic does someone have to be to post like this

When did Dab Forums, the internet hate machine, become fucking Fox News? This is what your senile grandpa is supposed to be shouting, not Dab Forums

Not that same user, but Dab Forums back in it's prime was always against the status quo.

Dab Forums has always hated cityfags

Stop committing crimes with guns.

Pro tip: you won't

I have never committed a crime with a gun. Most gun criminals are black or hispanic and most gun criminals got their guns via theft or straw purchase
bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/suficspi16.pdf

Then do something about it

Biden's vow for gun control is just to appease the smooth brained portion of the liberal party. I doubt they'll pass, and if they do, they'll be impossible to enforce. All this "they're cummin for your guns" is just to keep gun sales high and the market dry.

We are. It's called concealed carry laws and no gun free zones. Guess who has a problem with that.

And then tell me which gun free zone has ever worked or which city with strict gun control doesn't have high crime and shootings.

Did you forget the shenanigans that the ATF pulled while Trump was in office? You think they'll give a fuck when Biden lets them off the leash? Hell we already had innocent people being killed for red flag laws.

I don't care. Guns bore me.

Easy, federal stand your ground, constitutional carry, and stop and frisk every black and hispanic man on sight. (((bloomberg))) did the third and cut crime in NYC and then when he left crime when back up
Biden has been anti gun all his life. He legit wants Americans disarmed so that they are easier to abuse
so stop shitposting in this thread and stop trying to ban guns

And mods ban us for not using "newspaper" websites. Figures. Y'know it really says something that you can have a more reasonable debate on Dab Forums than you can on Dab Forums.

>you can have a more reasonable debate on Dab Forums than you can on Dab Forums.
lmao no

You're telling me an agency who has less agents than most large city police departments is going to round us all up?

This is preached every time a dem president gets elected and shit never happens. All I ever see is prices on ammo and guns skyrocket.

>lmao no
>I don't care. Guns bore me.
Sure is reasonable in here.

>You're telling me an agency who has less agents than most large city police departments is going to round us all up?
All at once? No. That would cause every gun owner to revolt. But a few examples here and there over time seems to work for them. Also remember Hurricane Katrina when federal and national guard confiscated thousands of guns from people when they needed them the most?

lamo yes. Dab Forums has flags so we have fewer brit bongs larping
>You're telling me an agency who has less agents than most large city police departments is going to round us all up?
ATF should have 0 agents
>This is preached every time a dem president gets elected and shit never happens. All I ever see is prices on ammo and guns skyrocket.
What are you talking about? Democrat FDR signed the NFA. Democrat LBJ signed the GCA. Democrat Bill Clinton signed the AWB and Brady Bill. Democrat obongo tried to get an awb and a no fly no buy bill passed. Democrat Biden was part of the obongo administration and voted for both of those bills that clinton signed and wrote the bill the AWB was a part of. Are you like 16 and that is why you didn't know about the the Clinton gun laws?

Don't forget Trump, Reagan, Bush Sr. And W.

RINOs

>Don't forget Trump,
What gun law did he pass?
>Reagan,
Was a total fucking cuck on guns no doubt, but at least the FOPA got us some concessions, unlike every other law I mentioned.
>Bush Sr. And W.
What gun laws did they pass? If we are going by import ban EOs, Obongo and Clinton did literally the same shit

>What gun law did he pass?
In 2018 he signed an appropriations act to make improvements to the NIBCS. It required federal agencies to submit certification reports to ensure they were complying with records keeping and transmission requirement, effectively increasing federal oversight on background checks. Trump banned bump stocks following the Vegas shooting. Trump also put his support behind a federal bill sponsored by Joe Manchin that would've expanded universal background checks to include private sellers at gun shows and over the internet however the bill was voted down 54-46.

>In 2018 he signed an appropriations act to make improvements to the NIBCS. It required federal agencies to submit certification reports to ensure they were complying with records keeping and transmission requirement, effectively increasing federal oversight on background checks.
Didn't realize a dem stuffed that in there. Now the fact you said "federal agencies", does this basically only apply to the military when they weren't putting in people's dishonorable discharges?
> Trump banned bump stocks following the Vegas shooting.
cuckshit, but not actually a law. It is overreaching by a federal agency and all versions of this regardless of the agency should be killed as it circumvents the legislative process and the voters
>Trump also put his support behind a federal bill sponsored by Joe Manchin that would've expanded universal background checks to include private sellers at gun shows and over the internet however the bill was voted down 54-46.
Also cuckshit, but didn't pass

>words words words words

Just type "I am coping" next time.

>Didn't realize a dem stuffed that in there.
I don't know who all was involved in the process. You asked what gun legislation Trump passed and I answered. This isn't a "law" per se but it seemed relevant to the conversation seeing as how background checks are a huge flashpoint for a lot of gun control debates.

>Now the fact you said "federal agencies", does this basically only apply to the military when they weren't putting in people's dishonorable discharges?
I have no idea what you're referring to.

>cuckshit, but not actually a law. It is overreaching by a federal agency and all versions of this regardless of the agency should be killed as it circumvents the legislative process and the voters
Ok. I didn't put fourth any assertion as to whether or not I agreed with the law so I'm not sure what position you think you're arguing against. You asked a question and I answered it.

>Also cuckshit, but didn't pass
Again, a little irrelevant. I estimated that gun legislation that Trump supported would also be relevant to the question "what gun laws did he pass" so I included it.

>Gun control

Finally.

That honestly sounds like a decent compromise. The real purpose of gun control is to keep them out of the hands of psychos and retards. As long as you can prove basic firearm competency, and keep it to yourself, I don't give a shit what you do.

I wrote 5 whole sentences you illiterate retard.
kill yourself
>I don't know who all was involved in the process. You asked what gun legislation Trump passed and I answered. This isn't a "law" per se but it seemed relevant to the conversation seeing as how background checks are a huge flashpoint for a lot of gun control debates.
I'm sure it was a dem and it is a law.
>I have no idea what you're referring to.
Your post said federal agencies. For it to be federal agencies and not state agencies I'd have to assume it was something related to the FBI or military. The church shooter who was chased off by an NRA instructor with an AR for doing an involuntary abortion was dishonorably discharged from the chair force for beating his wife and kid which would have disqualified him from owning guns, but the chairforce never reported him so he wasn't in NICS as a prohibited person and bought guns. This happened november 2017 so it likely was the reason for the law change.
>Ok. I didn't put fourth any assertion as to whether or not I agreed with the law so I'm not sure what position you think you're arguing against. You asked a question and I answered it.
That it is legislating from an agency that does not have legislative power. It is Chevron defense/doctrine bullshit that should be overturned because the chevron defense/doctrine is complete shit.
>Again, a little irrelevant. I estimated that gun legislation that Trump supported would also be relevant to the question "what gun laws did he pass" so I included it.
The question was what did he "pass". He didn't pass that cuck shit. Most trump supporters aren't loyal to trump per say, we just fucking despise the dems and establishment.

>The real purpose of gun control is to keep them out of the hands of psychos and retards.
define this? Because gun control literally exists to make it so blacks and poors can't own guns.
>As long as you can prove basic firearm competency, and keep it to yourself, I don't give a shit what you do.
woah woah woah, where did the " prove basic firearm competency" come from? I totally do not need a licence to buy a car, build a car, or drive a car on my property.

>kill yourself
You first.

>words worsd words words words words words words words words words words words words

>I'm sure it was a dem and it is a law.
Trump supported it. Trump signed it. I don't know how "it was a dem" is relevant. You're just wildly speculating with no basis.

>Your post said federal agencies. For it to be federal agencies and not state agencies I'd have to assume it was something related to the FBI or military.
FFL and ATF are federal agencies, user, therefore a federal agency regulates background checks.

>The church shooter who was chased off by an NRA instructor with an AR for doing an involuntary abortion was dishonorably discharged from the chair force for beating his wife and kid which would have disqualified him from owning guns, but the chairforce never reported him so he wasn't in NICS as a prohibited person and bought guns. This happened november 2017 so it likely was the reason for the law change.
I have no idea what spurred the law change. Neither do you. It also holds no relevance to what I'm talking about.

>That it is legislating from an agency that does not have legislative power. It is Chevron defense/doctrine bullshit that should be overturned because the chevron defense/doctrine is complete shit.
I never came out for or against this law so I'm not sure who you're arguing with because it sure isn't me. For all you know I could agree with you. You asked what law he passed and I answered.

>The question was what did he "pass". He didn't pass that cuck shit.
He supported it and it was voted down in the senate. The fact that he tried to pass it and fail is completely relevant. If I tried to murder someone and fail I would still be guilty of the attempt, user. Trump isn't absolved of the implications of what laws he supports simply because they didn't fail. That's a really chickenshit, weasly way to try to squirm out of responsibility.

>Most trump supporters aren't loyal to trump per say, we just fucking despise the dems and establishment.
Yes, ruin your own country to own the libs. We know.

cool story illiterate. Maybe go on Dab Forums so you can use pictures instead of words
no, you.
>Trump supported it. Trump signed it. I don't know how "it was a dem" is relevant. You're just wildly speculating with no basis.
It was an omnibus spending bill that some dem put bullshit legislation in. Do you concede that obongo supports indefinite detention of American citizens? Because he signed that shit into law as part of an omnibus spending bill. And a dem inserting it is completely relevant.
>FFL and ATF are federal agencies, user, therefore a federal agency regulates background checks.
What? an FFL isn't an agency, an FFL is a licence someone needs to have to sell guns. Do you know what you are talking about? and the ATF doesn't do background checks, the FBI does. Also that isn't what your sentence said originally. It said federal agencies would have to submit reports showing they were giving the info they were required to to the FBI for the FBI's NICS database. The FBI has run NICS since the brady bill made the NICS.
>I have no idea what spurred the law change. Neither do you. It also holds no relevance to what I'm talking about.
All this fucking cope. This was absolutely done right after that shooting and it why the bill happened. But you don't know what an FFL is and reddit space, so I assume you are reading a script.
>I never came out for or against this law so I'm not sure who you're arguing with because it sure isn't me. For all you know I could agree with you. You asked what law he passed and I answered.
It wasn't a law. It wasn't based on legislation. It was an executive agency declaring something beyond it's regulatory power due to Chevron.

>The real purpose of gun control is to keep them out of the hands of psychos and retards.
That's not the real purpose but whatever. If we follow this idea then yes if I build it on my property I should be able to do whatever I want with it so long as I don't hurt anybody. We already have people in America who own belt-fed machine guns, flamethrowers, mines, artillery, tanks and even disarmed fighter jets. The last time there has ever been a tank rampage was from the still-incompetent national guard. The overwhelming majority of shootings in this country involve handguns but we never hear about that in the news, so one has to wonder what the real purpose of this new bill is aimed towards. As for AR-15s being used in massacres the answer to that is concealed carriers who are trained, licensed, and five to seven times less to commit crimes than your average citizen. We already have a handful of examples where they've stopped active shooters, in some cases without firing a shot (Clackamas mall shooting).

>He supported it and it was voted down in the senate. The fact that he tried to pass it and fail is completely relevant. If I tried to murder someone and fail I would still be guilty of the attempt, user. Trump isn't absolved of the implications of what laws he supports simply because they didn't fail. That's a really chickenshit, weasly way to try to squirm out of responsibility.
You are conflating 2 different things and I did call it cuck shit, but you are acting like it passed and wasn't just another retarded thing he said
>Yes, ruin your own country to own the libs. We know.
What are you talking about? Dems have been ruining the country since I was alive. Trump was great and made the USA better. Dems have never done a good thing for this nation.

>we don't actually have policy, morals, or ideals, we just hate the other guy
We know. That's why you amd your base are being snuffed out. Bring some stuffing or gravy to the big boy table or forever be a kiddie.

>>we don't actually have policy, morals, or ideals, we just hate the other guy
Great strawman, faggot.
>We know. That's why you amd your base are being snuffed out. Bring some stuffing or gravy to the big boy table or forever be a kiddie.
Come and take it, you foreign faggot

>Trump was great and made the USA better.
Said nobody with a brain ever. Future historians, far removed from our squabbles, will rank him near the bottom.
>Dems have never done a good thing for this nation.
Pulling us out of multiple recessions to include the Great Depression. Winning World War II. Moving healthcare from a complete shit show to mostly a shit show. Civil right act. Cleaner air and water. Ya, nothing. Fortunately, the reps have made socialism for corporations their driving modus operandi which has been really great for all Americans with all that trickle down you have been seeing for fourth years!

>but you are acting like it passed and wasn't just another retarded thing he said
I explicitly stated in my very first post that it didn't pass. He's the president of the United States. I find this is a common theme among Trump supporters - whenever he does or says something that goes against their narrative or something they can't defend they say "Oh, he just says stupid shit sometimes". Its okay to say you don't agree with it. Just own up to your principals, user. Stop trying to blame some phantom "dem". Stop trying to slither your way out of it. Either you agree with his decision or you don't.

>What are you talking about? Dems have been ruining the country since I was alive. Trump was great and made the USA better.
This is a thread I'm not really interested in pulling seeing as how you yourself have already admitted that the majority of your political positions are built on you hating democrats and "the establishment".

>Said nobody with a brain ever. Future historians, far removed from our squabbles, will rank him near the bottom.
only if their only source is the >orange man bad propaganda
>Pulling us out of multiple recessions to include the Great Depression.
Dems did not pull us out of any recessions. WWII ended the great depression, FDR exacerbated it and burned crops while people starved because he was a piece of shit
>Winning World War II.
Had nothing to do with the president. Ike was the allied commander and a Republican
>Moving healthcare from a complete shit show to mostly a shit show.
Obongo care was fucking terrible
> Civil right act.
Passed by more republican lawmakers than dems
>Cleaner air and water.
Nixon did that and was a republican
> Ya, nothing.
exactly
>Fortunately, the reps have made socialism for corporations their driving modus operandi which has been really great for all Americans with all that trickle down you have been seeing for fourth years!
You mean the dems like Warren who pledge to kick normal people out of the stockmarket over $gme? Or biden's admin which caused robinhood to halt trading for normies?
>He's the president of the United States.
No he isn't.
> I find this is a common theme among Trump supporters - whenever he does or says something that goes against their narrative or something they can't defend they say "Oh, he just says stupid shit sometimes". Its okay to say you don't agree with it.
I've been critical of trump when he actually signs shit into law that I don't like. But he also just says retarded shit he doesn't act on all the time.
>Stop trying to blame some phantom "dem".
Pretty much 100% of the time if something bad happens, the dems did it.
>This is a thread I'm not really interested in pulling seeing as how you yourself have already admitted that the majority of your political positions are built on you hating democrats and "the establishment".
Because the platform of the dems is toxic

Daily reminder moderation literally defines the model citizen. Cynicism, paranoia, and bitterness/contempt toward the average citizen is antisocial and the downfall of a free society. A philosophy that's a product of these attitudes is a disease to prosperity, order, and stability.

Okay. Thanks. Keep me posted.

autism

>Okay
>keep me posted
I can smell the vodka.

>implying

youtube.com/watch?v=AVOpx6wzocc

This guy breaks down the bill and covers pretty much everything that we've covered here. If there's anyone defending 127 then PLEASE I'd love to hear it.

She also wrote the "Gun Safety: Not Sorry Act of 2021", because she is a professional, which requires a 7 business day waiting period for semiautomatic firearm, a silencer, armor piercing ammunition, or a large capacity ammunition magazine. What is the current wait for the ATF to approve silencer permits? Lie 90 days?

I can already smell republicans making it so any new gun laws end up tied to "yearly earnings" because poor people = bad

also bumping to page 1

>They are all human rights deniers and all objectively evil.
LMFAO

Self defense is a natural right.

>I can already smell republicans making it so any new gun laws end up tied to "yearly earnings" because poor people = bad
The only people advocating taking away guns from poor people are Democrats.

Remember when Michael Bloomberg specifically stated that minorities should be disarmed by the government?
npr.org/2020/02/11/804795405/throw-them-against-the-wall-and-frisk-them-bloomberg-s-2015-race-talk-stirs-deba
newsmax.com/US/bloomberg-black-men-guns/2015/02/08/id/623514/

You can't take back your words Beto

You're saying this in a board largely dominated by the tRump poster and the anime poster

9 months to a year 3 years ago, probably more now that they are probably backlogged. Assuming that requests for tax stamp items went up along with ammo and firearm sales in the last year.

Right now average time is 150 days for a form 4, 90 for a form 1

You mean how Dems want you to pay $200 per "assault weapon" and "high capacity" magazine to register them under the NFA? Or how the mess that is HR 127 wants you to pay for licensing, a psych eval, 24hrs of training, and insurance before you can purchase a firearm?

>licensing, a psych eval, 24hrs of training, and insurance before you can purchase a firearm?
They got to repay all of their donation somehow, it's a pretty good way to return a favor right there

SHALL NOT

Mods have removed Breitbart posts before even when it's a news piece (not opinion) and even when Breitbart literally links directly to primary source like a video of the incident.
This is how it starts, this is how SJWs take places down. Once they get one mod on one board the cancer spreads

WELL REGULATED MILITIA qualifies the infringed clause, gun nut Rambo wannabe. And as soon as we get a Progressive SCOTUS again and the cave men conservative ooga booga activists are relegated to the shadows, it will be interpreted correctly according to the rules of English grammar. Which will bring them into synchronisity with the vast majority of Americans. You're on the wrong side of history just like every rightwing position which inevitably gets swept away by societal progress.