Republican smear job on AOC was an attack meant to downplay Trump's failed coup

Do you honestly believe the meme using a Jussie Smollet quote was intended to be a claim of fact and not mockery?

>constantly demand attention
>pretend to be the victim when you get attention
you just won't stop. You're like the woman who wears a tight top showing cleavage and then pretends to be oppressed when men look at it.

You're like the guy who tells a woman you want to rape her then blames her for running away

You're like the woman who goes to the bar with a 4-inch skirt then cries "RAPE" when a man says "hi" to you

>Everything has to be a meme to the right wing.
Just another way to muddy the waters to distract from the fact they tried to overthrow the government and assassinate high ranking members of it.

Sometimes a meme is just a meme. No one made the claim that the fact checker is debunking.

Nope, in this case it exists to delegitimize actual victims.
Good job, the right wing's attack on AOC just gave a second wind to the #MeToo movement.

lol, it's fucking hilarious watching you guys obsessing over this woman, you're literally triggered by her simply existing, and the constant attention is more akin to simping that anything seen on the left, however much you try to disguise it with criticism or moral disgust.

>Boebert’s interview with Laura Ingraham
Why the fuck does this high school dropout CUNT even get a platform to speak on?

So a Democrat lied and cried Wolf again...not news.Some day, a real wolf is going to come and bite them for real, ad we'll just laugh and say they aren't fooling us again.

Wait it's satire now?

>Facebook post with more than 50,000 views on Wednesday features a picture of Ocasio-Cortez overlaid with a quote. “And then the Capitol police officer said ‘This is MAGA country!’” reads the text.
>The post also includes a line attributing the quote to “Alexandria Ocasio-Smollet,” a reference to former “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett, who was accused of staging a racist, anti-gay attack against himself in 2019.
Real AP journalists are factchecking an obviously satirical boomer meme?

>failed coup
the senate trial isn't going to work guys you can let this go

>It's meant to mock the congresswoman because she was freaking out over a crisis situation
Thanks for clearing that up user

>obviously satirical
The term of art according to the god emperor, is "it was sarcasm." The sort of QOPE you shit out of your facehole when you get caught lying and spreading sedition.

Congratulations user, you've perfected the art of incel cringe.

Do you think that somehow means it didn't happen?

Yes.

The republicans aren't contesting that Trump did it. They're only contesting the legality of the trial.

>no no no you cant just point out how this entire process is a violation of the constitution

All the other impeachments that have happened after a term expired must be unconstitutional then, too, right?

Nigga, do you think I am a senator? Does this look like the Senate floor? No one gives a shit what you think.

The impeachment trial isn't unconstitutional.

Cool opinion

Nice try at not addressing the fact that Trump is guilty as sin.
washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/28/5-arguments-gop-is-making-against-impeachment-parsed/

do Democrats have the votes? No?
>Innocent

Fuck outta here with your opinions.

You seem to not understand that Republicans don't have the votes to declare the trial unconstitutional. And they aren't trying to defend Trump, because they know he's guilty, but instead are trying to say there is no point to impeaching him.

>You seem to not understand that Republicans don't have the votes to declare the trial unconstitutional
You dont seem to understand Democracts dont have the votes to convict. 45-55. If you are not guilty your are???
>innocent.

>Blah blah blah muh vapid fucking opinion
No one cares

But it wasn't satirical, it's a loaded and racist term meant to attack Ocasio-Cortez.

>the fact that most Republican Senators are spineless, gutless craven cowardly bootlickers means Drumpf is innocent.
Nope. It means the Republican Senators are cowards who kneel in subservience to a Dear Leader wannabe dictator for life instead of supporting the US Constitution and Democracy. That is all it means.

>If you are not guilty your are???
>>innocent.
uh that's not how law works. but wouldnt expect a magat to understand between chewing crayons

>"""""""crisis""""""""
she literally wasn't in the building with the crisis though, she was being a drama queen for attention. Just like always. I'll bet you fell for her fake tears at the fence too didn't you

>literally
Into the trash your post goes.
That and the fact you're pushing another Big Lie about what AOC. said.

She literally didn't have any valid reason to be afraid and was literally just being a drama queen because she literally craves attention every waking second just like other millennial feminists.
Her entire life revolves around attention and victimhood and this is just another example of that.

>literally
>Using her experiences to try and both downplay her trauma and attack her.
Why are conservatives like you so consistently evil? Given you attempt to overthrow the US government and then get upset when certain officials are traumatized from the coup.

Nah man, we like that fact. We're only pretending to be sorry when people like you look.

>blublublu but it's (progressive dorito dust flavor term on top) an aaaaaaattttttaaaaccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Fuck off retard
Do this, man. Why engage longer than one reply when you're beating your head against a wall. Some people will not change or are being intentionally contrary. Move on.

She was still on the complex though and was in serious danger as the building she was in was broken into by Trump supporters as well. Stop being disingenuous

This you had another congressmen write that a SWAT team came through telling them all to stay in their offices and Mace, the Republican who smeared AOC wrote that she barricaded herself in out of fear of the terrorists on the day of the coup.

Good think no one believes you.

Good thing you think not only that no one "believes me" but, I assume, you think a lot of people don't think like this. You people would be even more insufferable.

But they already know you're insufferable, they're just to nice to say it. But the moment you fuck up, they'll feed you to the wolves.
cnn.com/2021/02/02/politics/capitol-riots-fbi-tips-family-friends-trnd/index.html

>Facebook post with more than 50,000 views on Wednesday features a picture of Ocasio-Cortez overlaid with a quote. “And then the Capitol police officer said ‘This is MAGA country!’” reads the text
Lol that's funny
But in all seriousness though, jussie was guilty and let off for political reasons just like José Inez García Zárate, because Democrats will refuse to prosecute a crime if it makes them look bad

Are you another person than who I replied to because this is a very weird sideways and you appear to have only read one word of my--- ... omg dead internet. Have I been shiften?! Hello hello can any real person hear me?! AhHHHHHH

The holy cringe-triggered-incel trifecta

>cringe-triggered-incel
2016 called, they want their bland insults back.

Nah, you're just insufferable.

cnn.com/2021/02/04/politics/fact-check-aoc-capitol-attack-photo-shoot-office-building-police-officer-cruz/index.html
Conservative News Network fact checks the lis against Ocasio-Cortez.
And just to show they're 'balanced' after being forced to prove republicans are lies, bring up two separate comments so they can bash her.

not an argument by the way.
AOC is an attention-whoring drama queen who loves the attention she gets by constantly playing the victim.

>they can't present an argument against me if I'm not arguing in good faith in the first place
>darkmantapshead.jif

Do you honestly believe you didn't just pull a classic motte and bailey?
Otherwise known as a flip-flop, or pussy-out
Ex:
>Hey did you know Rep. Ilhan Omar eats babies and worships Satan?
>Yo, what the fuck did you just say? I'm Muslim, that's deeply inaccurate and offensive
>H-haha, I was just joking, just being edgy, it's just a meme bro calm down
That is an actual real life conversation I was a part of with a Dab Forumsack. Not making that up, some sperg in one of my college classes unironically started loudly telling racist "jokes" every day in class and the when challenged by someone also pussies out back to "haha just joking, just being edgy, don't mind me"
I know people like you, I interact with you daily, you're rarely "just joking". Joking yes, JUST joking no.

the argument is that AOC has a record of being a drama queen who consistently pretends to be a victim for attention.
The counter-argument is that I don't have sex.

seems like maybe if you stopped fapping to AOC you wouldn't be too obsessed with sex to ignore the actual topic.

literally what the fuck was this rambling nonsense about? Who the fuck in this thread said anything about Omar eating babies and worshipping satan? Learn to read you idiot.

The problem is your original argument is based on lies that have been debunked. So until you bring actual evidence that isn't based on outright lies or intentionally misleading we can mock your virginity.

Oh. I thought it was the generic "side of good" story you included where everyone clapped. At least you had the awareness to not make yourself the hero. There is progress.

Doesn't really help when the "other side" just calmly accepts niggers as well, does it.

Point is, most of you retards believe lies, peddle lies, and do it behind the mask of sarcasm or comedy
One example of that is this thread where you attempt to slide an obviously embarrassing political moment by saying
>Is just a joke, pls no bully ;_;
When it's not JUST a joke, it's also an accurate representation of what many of you think and also happens to be blatantly false propaganda
I attempted to give you another example from real life as a demonstration of how pathetic this sort of excuse sounds when actually used in practice. You evidently are not good at learning from example, however.
Stop trying to motte and bailey, it's not cute

Very much this, people.
Same as the capital protest.
Back up, sit down, remain quite and content.
Not time yet. Don't show your hand when people like this are looking for you.
Let it build while they relax.

I personally have no issue with the black man but welcome the extermination of the nigger.

What you said makes no sense.
Also you're speaking to another user.

Tried to make it as plain as I could. I'm not racist. I know I'm not racist. I know I'm uncomfortable around loud noises and sudden activity.
I've had the education and training and understand that it's simply a result of their environment through a combination of failing families and abusive government/political management. I pity niggers. But I also avoid them, as I said.

I also grew up in the south and our valedictorian was a black kid my senior year and his sister was a cheerleader.

I do not have to accept that behavior nor be around it. And somehow that's become racist?

The lady doth protest to much me thinks...

>I-I have friends who are black so I'm not a racist, I just hate them, ok?

time just admitted election was rigged and big tech planned the 6th "coup"
youtube.com/watch?v=QyKFMW6LlW4

>lies
what lies?
>you retards
but user, you are the retards
>lies
but user, you are the ones lying
>you attempt
not me, retard
>joke
because "This is MAGA country" was obvious satire you retard. It was referring to Juicy Smollet, another fake news story that you tried to promote because lies is all you have.

go on? I would love to root out any remaining resentment or inaccuracies I've harbored against my fellow man, for any reason, with your assistance. So please, continue.
>I grew up in an environment where there were black people in a positive and pro-social condition in my formitive years, therefore I have no reason to belive that my hatred of niggers and nigger culture stems from any form of prejudgment or ignorance.
But you people do so like your little jabs, don't you.

Already listed, don't sealion.

>youtube cancer
Into the trash it goes.

She lied. end of story. has nothing to do with trump thats just in your tiny little brain.

Nope, you lied about her story because Republicans always need to destroy.

What a clown world we live in
>The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of

The only clowns are the right wing who tried to stage a coup and then have to not only pretend their failed coup wasn't a coup, but then attack the victims.

A bunch of useful idiots with no purpose, no clue, and no weapons could not put together a legitimate protest, let alone a coup. You really have no idea what staging a coup is, and it shows just how living in a clown world has warped your sense of reality. The fact that you can call someone a victim who was nowhere near the building that got broken into and nowhere near the pipe bombs (that didn't even go off) just shows that your are an active participant in this clown world.
>Hard times creates strong men
>Strong men create good times
>Good times create weak mean
>Weak men create clown world
>Clown world creates clowns (You are here)
>Clowns laugh at the hard times

Oh he mad

I can smell the cheeto dust from your post. Just do a 360 and walk away.

I’ve seen similar «jokes» made by Proud Boys. Not surprising.

So when a Democrat president like Biden will encourage his voters to storm the Congress and Fight Like Hell, like Trump did, you’ll look the other way and tell people to «get over it». Got it!

«It’s ok, guys, the bombs didn’t even go off!!111»

>negative space brain

Of course the GOP recognizes a professional victim, they’ve been playing the part for decades.

To bad AOC isn't one, the Republicans are just projecting.

>calling AOC out for her ludicrous lies is 360D multi-dimensional chess!
No, sweetie, its just people call AOC out for being a massive piece of shit.

Too bad impotent rightwing boomers (aka Fox Prime Time Entertainment demographic) who slobber and lust after AOC, incapable of even relieving their sexual frustration by whacking to her, spew vituperative venom at her to get an albeit poor substitute of emotional release.

It's understandable because right wing "women" either look like morbidly obese ham planets or anorexic skeletons so it's hard to get very aroused by those things.

>impotent rightwing boomers
>Fox Prime Time Entertainment demographic
> slobber and lust after AOC
>incapable of even relieving their sexual frustration by whacking to her
>spew vituperative venom at her to get an albeit poor substitute of emotional release.
>morbidly obese ham planets or anorexic skeletons
[x] Cringe

I know, I know Bobby Joe, facts is tough.

im joe biden and i forgot what i was gonna post

>facts is tough.
[x] ESL

man y'all really fall apart when your leftypol moderator takes the weekend off and you can't just censor everybody you disagree with. AOC is the very definition of a professional victim (some of the examples are outlined here ).

Sorry sweetie, AOC is telling the truth, you're just butthurt because it once again brings the spotlight onto the fact that the Republicans attempted a coup to overthrow the government.

t. the eternal white conservative "victim" who has been enslaved and discriminated against for 350+ years

HIT DOG

kek

Nice one
Bringing it back.
I like it

What did AOC do wrong? I don't know what the claims in are referring to specifically.

Literally every politician makes promises they do not keep, sometimes it seems like they want to tar their opponents, but they cannot do so without shining the light on themselves, so they make these very ambiguous unprovable claims. It is like having a fist fight because you don't want the other guy to kick you in the nuts.

Right wing can't meme

She keeps acting like the capitol protest was some kind of assassination plot and using that presumption to trash conservatives like Cruz. She's treating all Trump supporters (itself of broad category that could mean anyone who voted Republican) like the capitol protestors and treating all of those protestors like bomb planting terrorists. She claimed on Instagram that the police officer that came to her office to protect her was looking at her "with a tremendous amount of anger and hostility" which sounds pretty over-dramatic, like she's trying to create an issue where there wasn't one. On Twitter she shat on Cruz after he agreed with her on Robinhood's trickery in the wallstreetbets thing, directly accusing him of trying to have her murdered. These are all piled on to past criticisms of AOC for her populist tendencies. So people accuse her of being an attention-seeking drama queen, which I must assume is true since she uses Instagram.

>She keeps acting like the capitol protest was some kind of assassination plot
Why are you ignoring the fact that multiple terrorists openly said they wanted to kill Pelosi if they got their hands on her, erected a gallows and were chanting 'Hang mike pence!'?
It was a coup, and one of their objectives was to assassinate people.
The rest of your post isn't worth reading if you're going to start with such a brazen lie about the 1/6 Trump Coup.

>She keeps acting like the capitol protest was some kind of assassination plot
Its probably all of the people with pipe bombs, zip ties and nooses chanting to lynch politicians that confused her into believing that.

>using that presumption to trash conservatives like Cruz
Imagine thinking that Cruz doesn't exceed in trashing himself on a consistent basis. How the party of self-proclaimed courage, bravery and responsibility could shill for a man who spent four years sucking off a guy who called his wife ugly in public and accused his dad of murdering JFK is beyond fucking parody.

>She's treating all Trump supporters (itself of broad category that could mean anyone who voted Republican) like the capitol protestors
The vast majority of Trump supporters polled agreed with the terror attacks at the capital. This whole conservative pearl clutching routine is getting so fucking old. Conservatives spent four years absolutely eviscerating liberals at every given opportunity, calling them animals and murderers and commie scum and participated in a nationwide conspiracy based scheme to overturn a Democratic election and now you fuckers are trembling in your boots because AOC is being mean to you after terrorists tried to kill her. Seriously, conservatives are the biggest fucking snowflakes in existence.

>We were staging a protest by breaking into a government building, crashing through windows and planning to plant bombs everywhere

Not only that AOC decided to open up on some personal trauma she never discussed before as a way to create a dialogue for others suffering the same way in terms of abuse to help them, and the Republicans first response is to run a full court smear campaign against her.
It really does show how evil they are.

It was mostly peaceful, the actions of a few do not reflect the actions of the majority. Stop being ridiculous - most of the people inside the building committed offences no different to those who illegally entered the capital building to protest kavenaugh.

No, AOC got caught in a lie and then cited claims of previous abuse as a shield.

not an argument

Dab Forums aka reddit is furious they can't spam their lies without being challenged here.

>No, AOC got caught in a lie and then cited claims of previous abuse as a shield
>S-see guys, hot Puerto Rican women are stinky and have cooties, ok?
Yeah, go join your Proud Boy butt buddies in the "male" only sauna, incel, lol!

>Mostly peaceful
No

>Caught in a lie
No

>>constantly crave attention and constantly pretend to be a victim for attention
You know there was actual death threats against her, right?

I'll do you one better, someone was threatening to kill AOC at the failed coup
usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/23/fbi-charges-capitol-rioter-threat-kill-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/6687691002/

You know there are actual death threats against every politician right? You know there were actually multiple assassination attempts against Trump right? Yet AOC is the only one crying about it and being a drama queen like this, because that's all millennial feminists know how to do.

Nothing about this statement is particularly accurate in any way, you're just malding

>public figure receiving death threats
Maybe she shouldn't advocate for putting people in camps for wrong think. Fascists get bashed. Cope.

good thing they didn't find her and steal her shoes and sell those shoes on the internet

>Moving the goalposts

the goalposts were:
AOC is a drama queen who greatly exaggerated her fear and danger just so she could get victim points.
Pointing out that many other politicians also received death threats without half as much drama, and pointing out that Trump actually had multiple assassination attempts without half as much drama, is not "moving the goalposts" it's just pointing out that AOC thrives on drama and pretending to be a victim with things that other politicians just brush off.

And the OP already proved you're a liar given your latest attacks on her were based on distorting what she said.

>pointing out that Trump actually had multiple assassination attempts without half as much drama
I'd really enjoy if you could cite one time someone physically attempted to assassinate Trump.

based

Bunker trannies are raiding this board

You will never be a woman

You faggots are seething. AOC is a lying cunt. Deal with it.

You will never be able to get rid of your male baldness pattern

When you inevitably kill yourself, your parents will put your real name on the grave

Weak bitch
Play it in E.

Jimmy Dore knows that a real he-woman like Tulsi Gabbard wouldn't whine like this

I feel so bad for those poor politicians who had one bad day. These thieves and mass murders were scared for an entire hour, maybe two. The building where they commit their crimes against humanity had some windows broken. I'm literally shaking.

>because "This is MAGA country" was obvious satire you retard.
>Gets btfo
>have to pivot to a post no once is even denying
Yep its retarded and democrat alright

>And the OP already proved you're a liar given your latest attacks on her were based on distorting what she said.
What distortion retard, all of the shit she said is euther a lie or a joke which OP post prove magnificently

>Good job, the right wing's attack on AOC just gave a second wind to the #MeToo movement.
so is it a joke or a retarded strawman lie?

Ah so a cope that demotards are severe retards that don't only have the votes but the IQ to convict him. congrats

I know you're meming but it's terrifying that some retards and especially here in 4chin starts to believed this retarded horseshit

>coping this much after her lies got debunked to hell and back

>It was a coup, and one of their objectives was to assassinate people.
Projecting demotards are always projecting. This is no different than BLM retards wanting to kill Trump

Even the way trannies write is disgusting and obvious

>Its probably all of the people with pipe bombs, zip ties and nooses chanting to lynch politicians that confused her into believing that.
You mean not even 0.001% of the people in the protest and not even the goal of the protest apart from some retarded MSM lies? I like how your retarded fantasy narrative only consist of some weird boomer FB post and MSM lies.

>The vast majority of Trump supporters polled agreed with the terror attacks at the capital.
And they're based. The democrats are also retarded enough that they believe in the Russian hoax btw

>Seriously, conservatives are the biggest fucking snowflakes in existence.
And then your whole retarded post becomes null the moment you label a peaceful protest as terrorism.

lol at this obvious retard newfag mad that based Dab Forumschads dabbed at retarded false MSM narrative,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination_attempts_and_plots#Donald_Trump

Of course leftards always can't cope with facts which is why OP and his retarded ass made this thread and accidentally proved AOC lied yet again.

>Suddenly a flood of Dab Forumsppets gaslighting
They're really threatened by a strong woman like AOC.

Can you samefag harder?
>Inb4 you use 4chanX to run a half assed cover up

You’re trying too hard

>strong woman like AOC
I mean even if you are a democrat and like her, how can you pretend she has a backbone when she is constantly getting cuckqueen'd by Nancy.

>Using a reddit meme
LOL, Dab Forums hasn't been relevant for years, and that was only because they just spammed what ever the Russians spoonfed them.

>can't handle the fact that he got btfo by facts and logic and immediately resort to ad hom
Yep it's retarded alright

HRT is frying your brain

>short circuited so much by based Dab Forumschad living in his head rent free he now sees everything as Reddit meme
ngmi

>muh russians
Top kek

Surely inside every sane person doesn't like trannies. As humans we dislike ugly things by nature. It's kind of bad but it's what we are. You see an ugly face, you don't like it, even if you're polite to the ugly person (I am polite of course, I'm not a monster, but your brain still acknowledges that you're looking at something unattractive). However an ugly person didn't make himself ugly, he was born that way, it's not his fault, unlike trannies that make themselves more unattractive by "changing sex".

I'd argue trannies are unattractive at a fundamental level and are thus undesirable beings and surely this is innately felt by most people even if they don't admit it. They are fucking repulsive just to look at, an aberration of nature, completely unnatural. Trannies are fucking ugly. If you're a heterosexual man (read: not a closeted basket case like a lot of you are) you will not be attracted to trannies at all. Meanwhile most actual faggots won't like them either because they're attracted to the male form, not some bastardized version of it screwed over by artificially induced hormones and possibly eunuched. Trannies are obviously mentally ill and every sane person knows this even if they don't admit it. There is nothing attractive about trannies on any level whatsoever.

>All these free (you)'s butt butthurt Dab Forumsppets

So what did Cortez do now to get this sudden flood of posting?
>AOC, Schumer announce special reimbursement funds for Covid funerals
Classy.

>The democrats are also retarded enough that they believe in the Russian hoax btw
As well as every US Intelligence Agency and the Senate bipartisan Intelligence Committee chaired by a Trump bootlicker. However, it's true that Trump said, "I asked my beautiful best friend Vlad about it and he said he dindu nuffin'. Idk, I believe him and everybody said they believed him, so you know...it was just a hoax...a witch hunt...nothing there. What can I say...the Dems, deep state, RINOs, MSM, they all hate me which means they hate America, ok? Oh, and they hate you too but you know I, uh, you know love you...right?"

Someone just linked your shit thread on Dab Forums
I guess its true bunker trannies are trying to colonize small boards. Even then you fail, you should end it all already

>>All these free (you)'s butt butthurt Dab Forumsppets
>
>So what did Cortez do now to get this sudden flood of posting?
>>AOC, Schumer announce special reimbursement funds for Covid funerals
>Classy.
lol, the trannies aren't even trying to be subtle

They’re men wearing wigs and calling themselves girls
Subtle is the last thing they can manage to be

>As well as every US Intelligence Agency and the Senate bipartisan Intelligence Committee chaired by a Trump bootlicker.
Yes, and they're retarded too or did the retardorats suddenly believe in the credibility of the FBI and CIA? The fact that they didn't even able to impeach or convict Trump based on the Russian hoax is all you need to prove that modern demotards are some of the most gullible moron in history

So it's just a bunch of losers who can't handle the facts that they were fed more lies and they need to double down on it.
No wonder they're spamming their tranny fetish here.

>Yes, and they're retarded too or did the retardorats suddenly believe in the credibility of the FBI and CIA?
What are you even talking about?

>The fact that they didn't even able to impeach or convict Trump based on the Russian hoax
They did impeach him. Its also legally impossible to convict a sitting president. The irony of you calling anybody a moron is palpable.

>What are you even talking about?
>retardorats so retarded, he can't even believe that the US Intelligence Agency and the Senate bipartisan Intelligence Committee are staffed by by CIA and FBI which have 0 credibility

>They did impeach him.
>retardorats so retarded, they didn't even read what reason that they impeached him for
There's a reason why Muller and Comey """"investigation"""" went nowhere and din't even impacted his presidency.

>There's a reason why Muller and Comey """"investigation"""" went nowhere and din't even impacted his presidency
Kek. Well. It impacted his presidency enough that he lost his re-election.

>retardorats so retarded, he can't even believe that the US Intelligence Agency and the Senate bipartisan Intelligence Committee are staffed by by CIA and FBI which have 0 credibility
Ah, the old vague gesturing at conspiracy with absolutely zero factual basis routine. A little old hat, don't you think?

I can only imagine how butthurt the redditors from Dab Forums are over the fact they can't spam their pepe and wojak cancer here.
Enjoy your time in Dab Forums where you have to make a point, or look like a fool and expose you're from reddit by advertising your obsession with trannies or using outdated memes from reddit.

>Kek. Well. It impacted his presidency enough that he lost his re-election.
I accept your concession

>Ah, the old vague gesturing at conspiracy with absolutely zero factual basis routine
I accept your double concession
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community

>Enjoy your time in Dab Forums where you have to make a point,
But OP post doesn't even have a point and are just retarded tranny schizo rambling.

I don't think the election was influenced by the impeachment. Even my Democrat family members saw it as more of a symbolic thing than something that actually changed voters' minds, and they are full on TDS.

The OP article is about how the right wing is running yet another smear campaign against AOC. Since your lie was refuted all you can do is talk about your mental health problems and fetishes.
>He actually thought Dab Forums would just roll over for his cancer.

>The OP article is about how the right wing is running yet another smear campaign against AOC.
How the fuck is the righ wing smearing her when she smear herself daily by posting retarded debunked lies?
>hurr durr I was in danger
>not even near the action

>Since your lie was refuted all you can do is talk about your mental health problems and fetishes.
Ah so its a tranny projection thread. Carry on then

Read the article, it shows how the right wing misinterpreted her words and created a lie to attack her. The fact you're repeating the lie only proves that's the real reason you're furious.
>Brings up his fetish again
We get it, you love trannies, you don't need to make every post about them.

jacobinmag.com/2021/02/aoc-capitol-riot-instagram-assault

Anyone who follows Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Instagram account probably expected that she would, at some point, post a video about what it was like to be inside the United States Capitol on January 6. Millions tuned in last week as she recounted what she saw.

The sometimes harrowing, sometimes humorous account had all the hallmarks of an AOC video — the self-deprecating laughter, the intense hand gestures, the clumsy maneuvering of the phone — only this one was undoubtedly more personal. She disclosed that she was a sexual assault survivor and explained that it was especially important for her to tell her story. “We cannot move on without accountability,” she said.

Unsurprisingly, all manner of right-wing commentators wasted no time in denouncing the Instagram video as a narcissistic, manipulative, self-centered, and — most amusingly — overly political response to the right-wing riot. More unexpected, though, were the denunciations from some corners of the Left.

On the Jimmy Dore Show, Glenn Greenwald took AOC to task for refusing to let bygones be bygones and rebuffing Ted Cruz on Twitter. The Texas senator had made a cynical overture to AOC by retweeting her call to investigate Robinhood’s role in the GameStop scandal, to which she responded: “I am happy to work with Republicans on this issue where there’s common ground, but you almost had me murdered 3 weeks ago so you can sit this one out ... In the meantime if you want to help, you can resign.”
Greenwald bemoaned AOC’s treatment of Cruz, citing a missed “opportunity for Right and Left to join together” — as if the problem with the Democratic Party is that it doesn’t collaborate with the Republican Party enough.

Luckily, AOC has yet to take the less-than-sage advice regularly hurled at her (for example, that she should force a floor vote on Medicare for All or be exposed as a sellout).

Since being elected in 2018, AOC has proven adept at the difficult balancing act of confronting those in her own party when necessary while parrying the GOP’s incessant attacks on her — and she understands very well just how racist and dangerous a significant section of the Republican base is. In 2018, federal investigators discovered a Facebook page made up of thousands of Border Patrol agents posting openly racist and sexist rants about detainees along with sexually graphic depictions of AOC. The existence of the group came to light as she and other lawmakers were on their way to visit a facility in Texas where members of the Facebook group worked.

Being an unabashedly left-wing politician in this country is not without its risks and requires a thick skin. This goes double for women and, especially, women of color. AOC had good reason to fear for her life on January 6.

In the Instagram video, she described the tense atmosphere in Washington, DC in the days leading up to the riot and receiving text messages from concerned colleagues that she “needed to be careful” because “everybody knew something was going to happen.” The buildup that she detailed, coupled with the reality that the armed, rabidly angry base of her political opponents was swarming the Capitol building, was more than enough reason for her to be terrified by the time she heard a booming voice yell, “Where is she? Where is she?” (She later learned it was a police officer.)

What seems to bother AOC’s detractors is that she’s even talking about it at all and in such personal terms. But this is just how she does politics. From the first day AOC was elected to Congress, she promised that she would take her constituents with her and demystify what went on in those supposedly hallowed halls. She is speaking to the audience that voted for her — and people who would have if they could have.

>Read the article, it shows how the right wing misinterpreted her words and created a lie to attack her.
I've read the article and this doesn't happen. The article just restates her tweet and making up retarded fantasies or non-existent right wing terrorist. Did you even read it? Why do trannies always project their faults and insecurities to normal people?

AOC’s approach is based on a rather obvious supposition: that people don’t want to be condescended to by politicians, they want to be leveled with. AOC’s Instagram videos are a venue to do just that. While other politicians struggle to seem like real people, AOC engages with supporters and brings them, as much as she can, into the foreign world of the legislature, sharing her dilemmas with a rare and striking frankness.

Her firsthand account of “What Happened at the Capitol” is not an aberration but a continuation of an extremely communicative, extremely effective style of politics that matches our era. Considering the historically unprecedented events that occurred at the Capitol, we should want our politicians to share what they saw, and we should expect them to be moved and sometimes terrified by those events. We should expect our politicians to be real people.

You clearly didn't read it, otherwise you'd know your man lie was already debunked.
>Still bringing up his fetish
You should get some professional help for that.

>cynical overture
>retweet just saying "I agree"
Uh what? What kind of schizo wrote this?

>What kind of schizo wrote this?
You did, the good you.

>You clearly didn't read it, otherwise you'd know your man lie was already debunked.
What lie and what debunking? There's a reason demotard trannies itt can't even name a single right wing lie against AOC and have to post links that didn't even mention any right wing lies.

My God! It all makes sense now!

>Now he resorts to sea lioning
>Still talking about his fetish.

>google what sealioning is
>it's just retarded cope that retarded leftard democrats got often btfo in debates
Like I said, trannies are not even subtle

>Being this upset that your tactic was called out
>Still talking about his fetish.

>>Being this upset that your tactic was called out
posting facts and logic isn't even a tactic you dumbfuck trannies and thank you for giving me an abundance of (You) due to your inability to contain your seethe and argue.

>Trying to pretend sealioning is facts and logic
>Still trying to regurgitate the lies that were already debunked
>Still talking about his fetish.

>trannies still pretending sealioning is a real thing
>trannies still can't come up with a single lie
>still get btfo and mad that he can't outwit a simple based Dab Forumschad

>Dab Forumsppet is upset that his claim was refuted
>Dab Forumsppet still pushing the big lie
>Still talking about his fetish.

AOC has some amazing tits or is that photoshop? Fuck it, we can't even trust our own reality.

>tranny can't even post a single coherent thing anymore
>still can't come up with just 1 example of a lie
>had to pivot to based Dab Forumschad living in his rent free as an attempt at arguing

>Dab Forumsppet is still furious his bad faith arguments were correctly called out
>Dab Forumsppet refuses to read the OP that refutes his lies
>Still talking about his fetish

fastcompany.com/90600552/what-aoc-is-doing-right-now-is-the-antidote-to-gop-gaslighting?
>The star congressperson is going to keep drawing attention to the trauma of the Capitol siege until her Republican colleagues stop pretending it doesn’t matter.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has clearly not gotten over the insurrection of January 6—and what almost happened that day.

But anyone who has gotten over it is in the wrong.

Ever since the Capitol siege that resulted in five deaths, dozens of injuries, and allegedly thwarted plans for much worse, Ocasio-Cortez has continually spoken up about the trauma she and many others incurred that day.

She first came forward with a harrowing account of what it felt like to be hunted at own her workplace, in a candid, hour-long Instagram Live session on January 12.

“It is not an exaggeration to say that many, many members of the House were nearly assassinated. It’s just not an exaggeration to say that at all,” she said during the stream. “We were very lucky that things happened within certain minutes that allowed members to escape the House floor unharmed. But many of us nearly and narrowly escaped death.”

In the days since the congressperson first recounted her experience, the facts have borne her out, with one Capitol rioter charged for threatening to assassinate her. In turn, AOC is taking every opportunity to make sure that her Republican colleagues, and anyone else who may doubt her account, don’t forget it.

When Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, whose objection to Joe Biden’s electoral vote count helped drive the insurrection, attempted to agree with Ocasio-Cortez on a separate issue last week, she brought the conversation right back around to January 6, and Cruz’s culpability.

>tranny still mad when people called out his retarded coping mechanism
>tranny still can't bring up just 1 example of lie when OP had none
>still obsessed over based Dab Forumschad

>I am happy to work with Republicans on this issue where there’s common ground, but you almost had me murdered 3 weeks ago so you can sit this one out.

>Happy to work w/ almost any other GOP that aren’t trying to get me killed.

>In the meantime if you want to help, you can resign.

Most recently, on Monday, February 1, Ocasio-Cortez opened up yet again about her tortuous experience, again on Instagram Live, fleshing out the portrait of her brush with death using fresh details. (If you have a couple minutes, this section is especially harrowing.) The biggest news to emerge from this latest IG Live is AOC’s revelation that she is a sexual assault survivor, something she disclosed to contextualize how it feels when Cruz or fellow Republican Marco Rubio suggest that we all move on from what happened on January 6. (“These are the same tactics of abusers,” she says at one point.)

>AOC just came out as a survivor of sexual assault and pushed through her tears to seamlessly draw comparison to the systematic abuse of the Right Wing. *That* is a warrior. Thank you, @AOC. ????

The fact that Ocasio-Cortez has been assaulted should, sadly, not be that surprising. A staggering one in three women reportedly experience sexual or physical abuse in their lifetimes. What is surprising, and refreshing, is her radical candor. It’s a useful way to ground personal experience within a vocabulary and a context that one in three women (and countless men) will understand: trauma.

Although the congressperson’s ever-present critics have already characterized her candor as “emotional manipulation,” what she’s doing is actually the opposite of that. Or rather, it’s the antidote to it.

Few words became as over- and misused as “gaslighting” during the Trump administration, but gaslighting is the ultimate form of emotional manipulation. The term is meant to evoke not merely an abuser’s denial of reality, but their alternate version of reality, which they then wield relentlessly in an effort to make the abused person accept it as truth. Right-wing extremism isn’t a problem in America; the real problem is Antifa and, somehow, Black Lives Matter! Trump wasn’t trying to steal the election by damaging the postal service during a pandemic; the Democrats were actually trying to steal it through mail-in voting!

After the term gaslighting achieved ubiquity around 2017, people frequently began subbing it in where it did not belong, often to describe simple lying or chiding. The term may have lost its potency, but the gaslighting itself never stopped under Trump. In fact, it’s still flourishing in his aftermath.

The Capitol siege is still less than a month in the rearview mirror and Senate Republicans like Cruz and Rubio are already distorting our collective memory of it. In their version, what happened was certainly a darn shame, but it wasn’t, like, impeachment-bad. And what almost happened? Well, that’s to be ignored entirely. It doesn’t matter. Let’s move in, for the sake of unity.

By downplaying the severity of January 6, these senators are being emotionally manipulative. They are denying the validity of trauma—both AOC’s personal trauma and the greater national trauma that the congressperson takes great care to acknowledge beyond her own.

After a year of COVID-19 and a historically contentious election, all Americans are currently steeped in trauma. We’re marinating in it. If you don’t think you’re experiencing trauma right now, what you’re probably experiencing is denial.

Trauma is significant and powerful and it demands to be recognized. And it is for this reason that AOC divulging her history as a sexual-assault survivor may prove most helpful.

There used to be an idea that to admit trauma was to exhibit weakness. Victims were encouraged to toughen up. Walk it off. Stiff upper lip. But to block out trauma for any extended period is like swallowing poison you have the option to spit out. Our emotions are part of our humanity, and to repress them is to be dehumanized. What the #MeToo movement did was create space for women to openly acknowledge their trauma and either seek justice for it or find a way to move past it.

By repeatedly grounding the Capitol siege in hers and the nation’s trauma, Ocasio-Cortez is providing the antidote to gaslighting. She keeps reiterating, as many times as it takes, the gravity of what happened on January 6—what we all saw from home, along with the insider perspective of what we didn’t see. And because she has an enormous megaphone, her message is mostly drowning out those who oppose her with their own interpretation of events.

Perhaps Ocasio-Cortez continuing to beat this drum will become the Capitol equivalent of Chanel Miller’s legendary victim impact statement against the Stanford rapist. Maybe this one congressperson’s personal point of view will help provide universal insight into the trauma of an entire nation. No matter what happens in the upcoming impeachment trial, though, Ocasio-Cortez has already refused to let her experience during the Capitol siege be diminished.

She’s also proven that acknowledging trauma is sometimes a way of harnessing power.

tl;dr
>Congresswoman doesn't take her meds, whole country affected

>Dab Forumsppet is still furious his bad faith arguments were correctly called out
>Dab Forumsppet refuses to read the OP that refutes his lies
>Still talking about his fetish

>tranny still mad when people called out his retarded coping mechanism only he cites
>tranny still can't bring up just 1 example of lie when OP had none
>still obsessed over based Dab Forumschad

>all these seething bunkertranny replies
It's like they think if they raid a dead board most of the site doesn't even realise exists they are revolutionaries.

>Dab Forumsppets are still furious their bad faith arguments were correctly called out
>Dab Forumsppets refuses to read the OP that refutes their lies
>Still talking about their fetish

Its a fucking Monday night. Go to sleep, don't you losers have work tomorrow?

>your side bad
>my side good
ywnbaw

Yes, when one side stages a violent, and deadly coup to overthrow the government while waving the flags of traitors, they are rightfully labeled the bad guys.

Cool, let me know when it happens.

I think you need more than a bunch of bored rednecks and soccer moms to pull off an actual coup, user.

>it wasn't successful so it didn't happen
Lol

The failed Trump Coup happened on 1/6 of 2021 in the United States at the Capitol Building no matter how much you want to lie or gaslight about it.

Strange, sounds like the kind of thing that gets people labelled as peaceful protestors.
Maybe the death count was too low or not enough buildings were torched, or maybe they should have tried to secede and seize territory of the United States, perhaps even murdered people in the name of a racial supremacy movement if they wanted to be considered peaceful protestors.

>no matter how much you want to lie or gaslight about it.
The absolute projection

>The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements
britannica.com/topic/coup-detat

The truth is bigotry you gaslighting magatard take a critical theory class and check your privilege.

>peaceful protestors.
What were they protesting?

>LE I REPEAT, WE DID NOT SUCCEED THERFORE IT WAS NOT A COUP

heard you the first time. Still wrong.

>I AM RIGHT, ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA IS *WRONG*!

Their concerns about election integrity being ignored. You'd have understood that instantly if you weren't a disingenuous golem parroting what you're told on social media and the television.
>LE HECKIN REDDIT SPEAK ALL CAPS
>le reddit spacing
>le it's le heckin le wholesome le 100 le coup le because le I le said le so
Here's an idea, instead of throwing a tantrum, why don't you try and prove your assertion that the people were staging a coup? Or does that not scratch your tribalist itch?

Do you know why they say it was an "attempted coup" and not a "coup". Could it be because attempting to do something and accomplishing the task are two entirely different things?

>Their concerns about election integrity
What are the sources for these concerns?

>Do you know why they say it was an "attempted coup" and not a "coup"
Because they're hysteric idiots that don't know the definitions of words?
>Could it be because attempting to do something and accomplishing the task are two entirely different things?
"The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements"

>its not a coup because they didn't succeed
We heard you the first three times. But because you are completely fucking retarded you'll probably post it a 4th time.

apnews.com/article/ex-military-cops-us-capitol-riot-a1cb17201dfddc98291edead5badc257

Several unprecedented anomalies in the election like the fact that so many bellwether counties were won by Trump, that the vote totals didn't fit Benford's law, and that Joe Biden received more votes than any other president and that voter turnout was apparently the highest ever.

>Bellwether counties
They are not infallible, otherwise they've been correct in every election
>Benford's law
reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-benford/fact-check-deviation-from-benfords-law-does-not-prove-election-fraud-idUSKBN27Q3AI
>Most votes
Because a lot of people hated Trumps and Trump supercharged his turn out. This election wasn't about Biden, it was if you hate or love Trump.

Sorry, but the election was clean, Trump's Big Lie cost America half a billion dollars, killed 5 people in a failed coup, got him the disgrace of being the only president impeached twice and because of how corrupt Republicans are, might still destroy Democracy in America.

The experts already looked at what Trump and his terrorists did, it's was an attempted coup.
politifact.com/article/2021/jan/06/coup-heres-some-history-and-context-help-you-decid/

Ew is this the tranny version of you will never pass?

Its alright bro, I'm sure you're right and they're wrong
>There were ex-cops there!
>There were ex-soldiers there!
>THIS IS LITERALLY A COUP! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
Take your meds
Even your own article doesn't explicit state it was a coup, lol, just a bunch of "experts" saying that it *could* be considered a coup, if you stretch the definition of coup thin enough.

>They are not infallible
Its cause for suspicion. When things don't add up, the reason why they don't add up should be discovered, not ignored or assumed.
>reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-benford/fact-check-deviation-from-benfords-law-does-not-prove-election-fraud-idUSKBN27Q3AI
I'm not saying its definitive proof, but just like your link admits, its a red flag. Its been used to detect fraud in other elections. Its reason to investigate.
>Because a lot of people hated Trumps and Trump supercharged his turn out.
Maybe that's the reason, but its also a guess without any solid evidence supporting it. Explaining a discrepancy of this magnitude requires more than guesswork, it needs an investigation to find an answer. Giving a reason for something isn't the same as proving that was the reason for it.

You can't brush off anomalies of these sort with assumed explanations. Biden supporters aren't even trying to prove the election was fair, they're declaring it as incontrovertible truth. That is also cause for concern, it should be in the their interest to refute these suspicions and prove there was no election fraud, but they won't even entertain investigations into the election. They were declaring that there were no issues in the election before they could even have known if that was true. Not just refuting fraud, but also things like software errors which they couldn't even know if they had occurred or not, they aren't privy to that information. They call the election the most secure in history, what's that supposed to mean, that the other elections were less secure? It sounds like obfuscation, not a real comparison. Faced with suspicion, they acted more suspicious, and then demanded we all stop being suspicious of them.

>They don't add up
Actually they do, you're just looking for excuses to steal the election by pointing at conspiracy theories with no merit. Until you have hard evidence and definitive proof, you're just puffing smoke.
Also you're the one who made the claim, it's up to you to prove it.

>My experts are right and yours are wrong!
>Just ignore there are multiple types of coups!
Sublime.

>but just like your link admits, its a red flag
Benfords Law assumes randomness. Intentionally holding back mail in ballots and counting them in bulk at the end instead of with the rest of the votes makes Benfords Law irrelevant in this case.

>Also you're the one who made the claim, it's up to you to prove it.
My claim is that there needs to be an investigation. My proof is that the election had anomalies that need to explained beyond mere guesswork. Why should your explanations of these anomalies be accepted without proof?

You have an explanation for why Benford's law may not apply. Do you have proof that your explanation is valid? The claim isn't about the change in the numbers over time while the votes were being counted, its about the final tabulations for each county. Counting mail-ins in bulk or not doesn't change the final totals.

The law would still apply as the mail in sample should still be random. You have two seperate data-sets that you are analysing.

>It was mostly peaceful, the actions of a few do not reflect the actions of the majority.
The entire fucking crowd was chanting "hang Mike Pence".

I took critical theory classes and it still isn't a coup you retard. There's a reason why you're the only 1 itt right now that label the protest as a coup.

Can you remind me of when BLM activists broke into the White House and forced Trump to flee for his life?

that's obviously a troll, user

>The entire fucking crowd was chanting "hang Mike Pence".
>chanting
>terrorism

1. Citation required
2. Chants don't constitute treason

The 1 where they burned DC and tried to storm the White House but failed miserably because they're niggers and libtards.

>fly across the country to attend a Trump rally after he tells his supporters to "be wild"
>march on the capitol after Trump says to "take your country back" and Giuliani calls for "trial by combat"
>chant about how you want to kill the legislators inside as they certify the election results to cement your candidate's loss
>set up a gallows
>break into the building carrying weapons, handcuffs, and bombs
>beat one of officers trying to protect the legislators to death
>get shot by another officer while trying to climb over a barricaded door into the senate chamber where the legislators are hiding

But it totally wasn't a coup attempt!

>But it totally wasn't a coup attempt!
Correct, none of those are coup attempt. Glad that one of the demotards can now stop coping after having 1000 media attempt to label it a s a coup

Trying to kill elected representatives to keep Trump in power isn't a coup attempt?

I don't what that has to do with the capitol protest of which 99% of the people there are not charged or arrested at all. They also got home safe and sound while libtards are still seething.

Okay? Even if that's true that doesn't mean the 1% of people who were involved in the attack weren't attempting a coup. There was a coup attempt regardless of how many of the Trump supports at the capitol were party of it.

>Even if that's true that doesn't mean the 1% of people who were involved in the attack weren't attempting a coup.
So you're saying it's not a coup at all and you had to stretch the definition of a coup in order to justify your retardedly debunked false narrative that it's a coup. Got it.
>takes selfies
>hurr durr oh gawd them old ladies is trying to kill me!

Are you genuinely braindead or just lying? The percentage of Trump supporters at the capitol who were trying to kill legislators has nothing to do with whether there was a coup or not. If only one of the senators had assassinated Caesar, would that make it not a coup?

>Coup
>Coup
>Coup
>Coup
What the fuck are you trying to achieve here? I honestly can't tell if your a hysterical schizo having a meltdown or a shill trying to astroturf

>Are you braindead!
>Context and circumstance has nothing to do with my need to paint this is a coup!!

I value truth. It's concerning that that's a foreign concept to you.

The people who attacked the capitol could've been alien lizardmen wearing human skinsuits to infiltrate and weaken Earth from within for all I care. It doesn't change the fact that the capitol was attacked by people seeking to kill our legislators and keep Trump in power. That's a coup no matter who did it and no matter how many people were involved.

>If only one of the senators had assassinated Caesar, would that make it not a coup?
If the senator in question try to tell people that taking selfies and walking around a coup then no it's not a coup at all. I like how you try to bring up actual coup and compared it to this peaceful protest you unironic retard.

>I value truth. It's concerning that that's a foreign concept to you.
>I value truth
>trying to paint a peaceful protest a coup
>truth
braindead and retarded

>It doesn't change the fact that the capitol was attacked by people seeking to kill our legislators and keep Trump in power.
No they don't, else 99% of them would get arrested which isn't the case. BLM riots which unironically killed more US citizens is unironically a coup by your retarded definition.

Still hard to tell if a shill or a hysterical retard...

Why would you call a mostly peaceful protest a coup?

>tfw liberals keep whinging on about pipe bombs and zip ties but keep forgetting that many radical conservatives own literal functioning tanks and heavy ordinance.
It's an abstract, sheltered kind of stupidity.

>created autonomous states by seizing US federal property
Unironically yes.

I can see the IP counter, you know.

Sounds more like a French Revolution scenario than a coup d'etat. Riots aren't coups.

So democrats had multiple coups in the summer?

youtube.com/watch?v=v8GhAEOREuE

>ad hominem

Bunker trannies have to resort on raiding a dead board and even then they can’t win
Jesus Christ

It's called a seditious conspiracy, but yes.

>Yes
And yet they were not punished. Thus precedent dictates that such behavior is acceptable.

You need to provide proof as to why it needs to be investigated.
So far you haven't.

it isn't a """smear job""" when she's an actual pig-dog from hell

They weren't punished because the summer protests weren't a coup or sedition. They were looking to reform intuitions, not overthrow them like the Republicans attempted in the failed Trump coup

The summer protests involved groups literally creating "autonomous zones" where they claimed American law did not apply. That's LITERALLY sedition.

Not a violent coup like the Republicans attempted. Try again.

Oh, so you didn't actually give a shit about whether something was sedition or not, you just used the word because it sounded nice to you. Gotcha.

So you think treason and a violent coup is fine when your side does it. So i can just call you a traitor. Gotcha.

>So you think treason and a violent coup is fine
I never said nor implied anything of the sort.

>So i can just call you a traitor.
You can call me whatever you want, but if your bar for "traitor" is "successfully called me out on dumb shit I said" you're the enemy of everyone in America with a brain.

You did with your whataboutism.
Also what Trump and follows committed was treason.
newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/did-donald-trump-and-his-supporters-commit-treason

>You did with your whataboutism.
I didn't "whatabout" you - that requires introducing an unrelated topic to the debate. I "fact checked", as it were, a statement that you had already made.

Why do you guys keep calling the world of Warcraft raid on the career politicians as a violent coup? Do you know what coups look like? Why are you indifferent when protests attack normal people but bug out when criminal politicians are protested? What is wrong with you?

Nope, you literally and figuratively went, 'what about CHAZ?' to justify Trump's treason. That's a clear absolutism.

Not him but using a direct comparison in a partisan debate in order to demonstrate inconsistent behavior or a hypocrisy of one of the parties is not "whataboutism", is an incredibly effective way of demonstrating how absolutely full of shit you are.

The same people who called CHAZ "a summer of love" and unironically stood infront of burning police stations while proclaiming to the camera that the protest was "mostly peaceful" are now gnashing their teeth and proclaiming how December 6th was an attack on our democracy.

Fuck outta here.

They’re not honest, they don’t have critical thinking, and they argue from a place of insecurity and lack of moral principle.

Don’t bother

The anomalies are cause for investigation.

>Nope, you literally and figuratively went, 'what about CHAZ?' to justify Trump's treason.
I literally didn't say *anything whatsoever* about Trump. You made an affirmative statement about how the summer protests did not involve sedition. I, then, pointed out that your statement was false.

This exact conversation could have happened in September of 2020, long before there was any capitol invasion to argue about.

Yeah, the right is such a bastion of reason, logic, facts and morality. So what's the latest Q drop? How are the rights plans to continue overthrowing Democracy and the Constitution shaping up? How's the defense of the most immoral, unethical blatantly criminal ex-president Dear Leader holding up?

The Senate had two entire months to investigate, backed up by essentially unlimited subpoena and financial authority, if they wanted to actually investigate any anomalies. It can convene an investigative panel at the drop of a hat.

The Republican-controlled Senate, of course, *explicitly declined* to convene any such panels, because eventually that panel would have to eventually release a report, and the contents of that report would have made Trump angry. Instead they chose to do no investigation whatsoever, so that their members would have cover to throw random accusations at the election.

Nah, it was a clear whataboutism, since you're trying to excuse the January coup attempt by going 'what about CHAZ?' in a futile attempt to equate the two. There's also the bigger problem that it was part of a protest to reform the system, as opposed the coup which was a violent attempt to overthrow the government, so your false equivalency holds even less water.

Do you have any proof for those claims?

Q is a meme thst a couple of boomers took seriously and the media spammed photos of boomers pretending it’s a prevelant, common belief to discredit their opposition.

There’s no simple democracy, it’s a constitutional republic. Well, was, the left has corrupted and destroyed the process. Do not mention the constitution as if you have any regard for it, as your favorite politicians have stomped on it and only invokes it when it wants to attack opposition

>what's the latest Q drop? How are the rights plans to continue overthrowing Democracy and the Constitution shaping up? How's the defense of the most immoral, unethical blatantly criminal ex-president Dear Leader holding up?
Your problem is that you live in an ideologically homogeneous bubble and thus your only understanding of Republicans comes from what the Media Tells you. Its always funny to me, when you try make these long insults but all you achieve is demonstrating how narrow your understanding of the world is.

If you had any intellectual curiosity at all you would have remedied this and it reflects very poorly on you for not doing so.
>You're a fucking NPC, dude.

>in a futile attempt to equate the two
The two are both acts of insurrection. You complaining about the one and not the other demonstrates how insincere and disingenuous you are.

The bullshit has been cut through with the precision of a scalpel and the brute force of an axe.

You describing the world of Warcraft raid on the capital as a violent insurrection?

Have you watched the videos of it? Do you guys live in reality?

No they weren't, it's funny how you're trying to falsely equate them as a means of exonerating Trump's treason since you can't defend what he did.

There was a group of 20-40 people who were obviously violent and clearly destroyed property and clearly intended on doing sketchy shit. They must be prosecuted to the fill extent of the law.

The rest who entered the building non-violently and then took selfies should be punished no different to the activists who stormed the building during the Kavanaugh hearings
>fines and restraining orders

This is what being objective looks like.

Hundreds of people beat a cop to death and trampled a woman while chanting "Hang Mike Pence" and trying to stop the election certification process

I wish he did half of the things you claim his done lmfao

Oh nooooooooo 4 people went into the capital chamberrrrr not muhhh politicansssss

>No they weren't
I rest my case.

>Nah, it was a clear whataboutism
YOU made a statement that was inaccurate. I corrected YOUR statement. It is literally impossible for this to be "whataboutism."

>in a futile attempt to equate the two
I never equated the two, nor said anything that implied it.

Yea, can you get a recent article on that cop?

Can you produce the video?

>the election certification process

You mean that song and dance that wasn’t legitimate to begin with?

I’m furious that some people dared to protest career politicians. They should be attacking people and their businesses for Floyd, the real injustice here

Lmfao

Proof that... the Senate can convene investigatory panels???

>Hundreds of people beat a cop to death
FALSE
edition.cnn.com/2021/02/02/politics/brian-sicknick-charges/index.html

>Yea, can you get a recent article on that cop?
Based knower.

Okay then lets change up the wording for your sake. Hundreds of people assaulted police officers while chanting Hang Mike Pence and trying to stop the election process

"As part of the investigation into the riots, prosecutors have charged several with assault against a federal officer stemming from violent episodes at the Capitol, separate from the one involving Sicknick.
In court documents, FBI agents have laid out elements of the attacks faced by officers in alarming detail. More than 100 police officers were injured in the melee, including at least 15 officers who required hospitalization, according to court documents"

A violent attack is a violent attack even if no one dies user

Dis right 'ere is maga cuntry, my lil spicy burrito. Now where dem shoes at?

At some point, you must hear yourselves and go
>Wait, did I really just argue that a crowd chanting death threats as it marches towards the last known location of the person they apparently want killed is non-threatening?
I simply refuse to admit that anyone is either this stupid, this deluded, or this willfully evil. You have to be trolling, there's no way that irl you're this retarded, too
I take some comfort in that. No one can be this stupid, I just don't believe it. Which means even you understand what's wrong, even if you're going to keep pretending to not know.

Proof that the Senate "*explicitly declined* to convene any such panels, because eventually that panel would have to eventually release a report, and the contents of that report would have made Trump angry. Instead they chose to do no investigation whatsoever, so that their members would have cover to throw random accusations at the election." If you made that claim in witness testimony, it would be thrown out as mere speculation. You can show that they didn't convene a panel, but unless you can read minds I'm going to need evidence that they had the motives you claim they had. We could speculate and come up with all kinds of reasons they might not convene a panel.

Wrong, you're the one that made the false equivalency, I correctly called it out.

The amount of butthurt this post has caused is rich

>it wasn't a coup or sedition
>they were just illegally seizing federal property and forming an unironic nation without our borders

>your only understanding of Republicans comes from what the Republicans say and do
ftfy

ITT: Hope AOC sees this, bro

>Federal property
What federal property?

What? All the thirsty incels lusting after her while also insulting her for doing a good job?

>Q is a meme thst a couple of boomers took seriously
Too late to forge a new narritive user.

>Your problem is that you live in an ideologically homogeneous bubble and thus your only understanding of Republicans comes from what the Media Tells you.
For every Rachel Maddow and The Young Turks there's 5000 shit brained partisan propaganda rightoid "news" networks, clickbait websites, YouTube Qultists.

Keep on simping bro

You're projecting again incel.

Simp

Everyone look at how mad the incel is.

Bruh stop being such a fag

Hope she sees THIS one, bro

>A bunch of redditors from Dab Forums and Dab Forums thought they could just waltz into Dab Forums and take the board over.
>They get bogged down by the unique rules
>A majority of them just flee outright after a few posts
>The remaining ones get destroyed by real facts and logic and can only resort to old and busted stale memes.
youtube.com/watch?v=1cqUnplyfV8

This thread is more proof that Dab Forums will forever be the Switzerland of Dab Forums. You can invade it, but you'll never occupy it.
Also I'm sure RapeApe stashed his nazi gold someone here.

>satire
Are you retarded?

>claiming victory over imaginary foes
[x] Cringe

>They get bogged down by the unique rules

What "unique" rules? no overt racism? no old articles? Not sure what you are referring to.

The territory of the united states?

>Just confirming the points made

>The territory of the united states
When did those dang liberals seize the US Virgin Islands?

>I don't know what the claims in are referring to specifically.
The fake-crying outside a fence is a reference to this:
i.ytimg.com/vi/pu2CWksV3l8/maxresdefault.jpg
where she pretended to cry over immigrants or some shit. It was just so obvious that was pretending to cry for drama.

Aside from that:
One of Trump's White House staff mentioned that AOC was working for the Biden campaign (which she was) so AOC claimed it was racist.
Oh and Trump called her AOC so she said that was sexist (i.imgur.com/jgi7XTy.png)

Also she's a socialist who keeps going on about how poor people in third-world countries need more money but then spent $250 on a haircut. And said it was sexist to point out the hypocrisy.

The point is: There's a pattern of her being a drama queen and pretending to be the victim for attention. This is also a general trend among millennial feminist women in general.

This is mostly facts. The only derogatory term he called her was a millennial.

Being a socialist doesn't mean you can't have luxuries.

>also she's socialist
AAAHHHHHH!

>Being a socialist doesn't mean you can't have luxuries and anybody who disagrees with this is a misogynist
This was AOC's actual argument though

Source?

yahoo.com/lifestyle/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-responds-haircut-backlash-aoc-161152697.html
theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/12/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-haircut-uproar-aoc-reminder-women-cant-win-under-the-patriarchy

>Wanting to take other people's money and give it to the poor doesn't mean you want your own money to go to the poor
this is the hypocritical mindset that people were criticizing

>Wanting to take other people's money and give it to the poor doesn't mean you want your own money to go to the poor

AOC doesn't pay taxes now?

40 million Americans live in poverty under today’s extreme inequality, yet the right-wing want you to blame Democratic socialism for their own moral failures.
Our policies, like Medicare for All, advance prosperity for working people.
They’re just mad we look good doing it

Won’t you look at that: Mike Pence used *taxpayer funds* - not personal ones - to spend several thousand haircuts’ worth of public money on a visit to Trump golf courses.
I wonder if Republicans care about corruption as much as they care about a woman’s cut & color.

You'll have to find where she said
>Being a socialist doesn't mean you can't have luxuries and anybody who disagrees with this is a misogynist
For me.

They literally, unironically, seized Capitol Hill street in Washington.

>Capitol Hill street in Washington
Where is that in the US Virgin Islands?
Please post a map and point it out to the class.

>Trump fags lie
Of course they do-they take pride in it. The only solution is to Janet Reno them and sweep up the charred bits.

>washington isn't US territory
okay.jpg

Washington is a state, we're talking about territories.
Maybe if you were an American and not some third world shill, you'd know the difference.

Nowhere in those articles does she even come close to implying that you can't be progressive and have money at the same time.

>a state isn't a territory
Okay.png

Is this how it's gonna be? Can't spam usual Dab Forums images so just spam links to them?

>Dab Forums is crippled when they can't spam reddit cancer like pepe and wojak and their cherry picked graphs.
Viva la Dab Forums.

Thanks to political amateur Trump administration, the USA had been ridiculed from all over the world, and its international credibility, leadership, and persuasiveness have been lost.
We must not underestimate the low intelligence of Americans, where 60% of adults believe in Creationism(pseudoscience) rather than evolution theory. Trump is just a symbol of arrogant, selfish, and poorly foresighted Americans.
His supporters, who are easily deceived by conspiracy theories and fake, are victims of inadequate low-level education.
What they need is not punishment, exclusion, criticism or neglect, i.e., hatred, but media/science literacy, logical thinking, problem-solving ability, treatment of delusional personality disorder by psychotherapy/counseling, i.e., love.

"Emotions Self-Responsibility Theory"

LOL. Don't be ridiculous user. That user is, of course an idiot for trying to argue political shit on Dab Forums However, I'm amazed you don't even see how hard of a self own that is. Dab Forums is inferior to all the other boards at discussing ANY visual evidence. And it's not as if there isn't a lot of perfectly reasonable research, graphs, charts, or memery to support your positions. But you don't actually present an argument. You have even less intellectual rigor than fucking /s4s/.

Not that's necessarily a bad thing. If posting garbage and rolling around in it is what you truly enjoy, I have no inclination to stop you, even if it were possible.

>visual evidence
If you have to add a modifier...

>Being this butthurt you can't use your normal cancerous tactics here.

Go ahead user. Complete the sentence. pwn yourself even harder. Your ability to present any sort of compelling, data driven argument is fucked here user.

When we have actual Happenings, people don't come to fucking Dab Forums for those events. This place doesn't handle the Syrian civil war, or the death of Quadaffi, or the Battalan well at all. And the state of the catalog is proof.

But don't get me wrong. I'm not even TRYING to post pol shit here. You clearly enjoy the state of the board as it is, and there's nothing wrong with that.

>pwn
I don't understand why you even bother posting, acting like that.

>visual evidence
Lol

You could say that about three fourths of Dab Forums, and two thirds of Dab Forums user.

Photojournalism means nothing to you? A visual record of what happened? You've got at what, a dozen different threads on the trump coup, with a grand total of what, a dozen fucking pictures of the crazy motherfuckers there.

Don't you ever, ever shitpost with Evangelion. She lied, get over it.

Based.

>incel simps getting uppity

>She lied
No. Asuka is disappointed in you for smearing an innocent girl.

>innocent
>calling a grown woman a girl
She lied. And I said don't shitpost with Eva.

Based.

No. Asuka is disappointed in you for smearing an innocent girl.

No she's not, RPer.

youtu.be/a3Z4RWZa9WA

Yes she is, you clearly didn't watch the show, or worse, are a Reifag.

>NNOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST SHOW AOC'S OWN TWEETS AS EVIDENCE AGAINST HER!!!
>How am I supposed to deny reality when you link to the evidence????
Cope harder.
This is all accurate btw, imagine seething this hard because somebody pointed out that your Queen is just an overly dramatic teenager

I saw her own video, it's the only thing that ousts her as a liar.

Then post links to the tweets, not these hobo-tier mosaics that are infamously prone to being manipulated.
Simple primary source, surely you can do that.

Nice what about-isms. Still doesn't change the fact that your former leader was impeached twice and the people who walk among you are domestic terrorist.

For every what AOC you point to and argue "something" I can point to at least 200 to match that. Quit damage controlling and try to add to the world for once in your life.

>Nice what aboutisms
>Makes whataboutisms
An insight into the insect brain of a chang. No self-awareness, completely incapable of abstract thought.

You clearly didn't, but you're part of the campaign to smear her.
The truth doesn't matter to Republicans.

>Denying reality itself
Impressive

Yes, I did. Even youtubers who call her out (and news media that even supports her otherwise) use the footage to talk about it.

>but you're part of the campaign to smear her.
This is like HRC crying about the vast right wing conspiracy against her and her husband, all over again.

Pro-tip bitch: people don't like you because you're corrupt, not because you're a woman.

>b-but republicans
All americans are animals and I've yet to vote in any election. Bush was a retard and Trump didn't make america great. You're still an asswipe, as is your party of corrupt democrats, just like the conservatives. You just happened to wind up worse than the right winged in the past 10 years.

And here comes the damage control shift.
Now is it three people who are being paid hot pockets, or one person trying to post with different styles.
Place your bets.

I'm top and bottom posts, and I stand by them. Made an addendum with the third after seeing the other reply. Now go back to getting your ass clapped, paranoid freak.

Lmao, imagine being like this

So it's only 2 shills
Very interesting.

>shills
You're insane, shitposter.

Why are you so nervous sounding? It doesn't help since you've been exposed.

Literally take your meds, and learn how the IP counter works

Yes, yes telling yourself to take your meds is a good thing.
Although you shouldn't be shilling for conservaitves, you were told that was bad.

>quoth the one who uses wojaks
See it all the time in Dab Forums and Dab Forums. Countless maga wojaks, as far as the eye can see. You people can't meme.

>That user is, of course an idiot for trying to argue political shit on /news
Look at 90% of this thread and the 90% of the threads in the catalog.

>all this projecting
You've run out of arguments and even insults.

The shill doth protest to much me thinks

>Look at 90% of this thread and the 90% of the threads in the catalog.
I'm going to trust you on the math. You know, if Dab Forums is really nothing but politics, maybe it should just be folded into Dab Forums

The right wing could never meme, they were just fed everything they posted by the Russians and still cling to it. 5 years later.

The leftists on this board would never survive that, the only thing preventing them from being driven out of Dab Forums like the money changers in the temple is the image limit on here

>The right wing could never meme, they were just fed everything they posted by the Russians and still cling to it. 5 years later.
And here you are still intensely butthurt about it despite your russiahoax conspiracy theories being constantly & thoroughly debunked, and yet you still cling to them. 5 years later.

>It was debunked
Wrong, Mueller Report confirmed it happened.

>russiahoax conspiracy theories being constantly & thoroughly debunked
Mueller report resulted in 30+ close Trump aides and Russians charged and convicted of felonies. Further he concluded Trump had obstructed justice on 10 separate occasions. Every US intelligence agency confirmed Russia orchestrated a concerted effort across multiple platforms to interfere in the 2016 election for the benefit of Trump. The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee chaired by one of Trump's lickspittles 1st Class, confirmed it.

Your gaslighting has no power here magat cultist/Vlad.

Confirmed what happened?
That Trump worked with Russia?
It didn't
It confirmed Russia worked the us like tools

>Mueller report resulted in 30+ close Trump aides and Russians charged and convicted of felonies
How many of these were unrelated to the overarching reason that the special investigation was conducted

AOCs entire career is a smear job against herself. Why would anyone go out of their way to stop her.

>Wrong, Mueller Report confirmed it happened.
>ANY DAY NOW WE GONNA FIND THEM RUSSIAN COLLOOOOOSIONS!
>HES GON BE IMPEACHED OUT OF OFFICE ANYYYYY DAAAAY NOW!
>HES GON BE IMPEACHED POST OFFICE ANNNNYYYYYYYYY DAAAAAAY NOW!
>NPR TOLD ME SO!