Biden opens the door for illegal scammers, assaulters, thieves, and cartels

White House press secretary Jen Psaki confirmed that President Biden's administration will not push to deport illegal immigrants who are convicted of driving under the influence or drug-related crimes.

“The priority for the enforcement of immigration laws on those who are posing a national security threat … a public safety threat, and on recent arrivals,” Psaki said during Monday’s press briefing. “Nobody is saying that DUIs or assault are acceptable behavior, and those arrested for such activities should be tried and sentenced as appropriate by local law enforcement. But we’re talking about the prioritization of who is going to be deported from the country.”

Instead, the plan will focus on immigrants who pose an immediate national security threat.

“Generally, these convictions would not include drug-based crimes (less serious offenses), simple assault, DUI, money laundering, property crimes, fraud, tax crimes, solicitation, or charges without convictions,” acting ICE Director Tae Johnson said in an email to senior officials.

Asked if this was the kind of “change” in immigration enforcement Biden was referring to during the presidential debates, Psaki said it was only part of a broader plan for the administration.

msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-administration-confirms-updated-guidance-not-to-prioritize-deporting-those-convicted-of-dui-or-assault/ar-BB1dvxAS

Attached: B84FC5B6-C096-44DF-A104-28A5202C5C85.jpg (450x600, 148.73K)

>Be immigrant
>Only have visa or green card
>Commit a crime
>Dont get deported
>Be illegal immigrant
>ditto
This is fucking insane. That wall was retarded but this is fucking insane.

Why the fuck cant American politicians apply just the most basic common sense to this problem? Holy shit.

This should be the top story, but it keeps getting slid by impeachment thread #327

Sorry fascist right wingers, you already used xenophobia as your main platform when you got BTFO in 2018. Can't use it again.

>xenophobia
There is nothing xenophobic about deporting illegally present foreign nationals who assault, scam, or put our citizens live’s in danger, and the state should not have to utilize taxpayer money to retain said offenders.
Why are you so unAmerican? Why do you hate America so much you’d rather support foreign criminals over the good people of the United States?

Why should they be deported? Why can't they just be tried and imprisoned under local jurisdiction?

No that's racist.

You fucking leftards rioted for 8 fucking months after some dumb ape got caught in a DUI and choked on his drugs he was afraid to be caught with due to violating probation. You fucks don't even believe in justice for criminal negroes and other browns.

>Why can't they just be tried and imprisoned under local jurisdiction?
Because they violated the law and they are not citizens. Why the fuck should we allow someone to join our society if they cant follow the basic rules while they are not yet citizens?

We cant control who is born into the country but we can control who we let in, so we should maintain pretty high standards to ensure that those we allow into the country are a benefit. Not talking about all crimes of course, but a felony should be a one stop ticket back to wherever the fuck you came from.

The autopsy report indicated Floyd died due to asphyxiation by having a knee pressed against his throat for an extended period of time by a racist cop. 93% of BLM protests were peaceful, but there were criminals who took advantage of them to loot. I'll bet you think the NFL athletes who took a knee during the white nationalist anthem should be charged with treason too.

>white nationalist anthem
[x] Cringe

It's boring racebait from the Washington Examiner. It should not be the top story.

Learn the difference between protesters and rioters.

Cringe harder, cuckboy.

there is evidence of violence and recklessness but no evidence of racism in Chauvin's history, you were manipulated by demagogues taking advantage of your fear of racism before the election

fuck off with this fake protester/rioter dichotomy

Whose autopsy? The one done by some media motivated fuckhead. The real autopsy, the one that was used in court, declared the death to have been caused by OD induced cardiac arrest. But you keep saying this lie, repeat it forever, ignore that once again the "hero" of the black community was a fucking piece of garbage.

The autopsy report I'm referencing was from the county coroner. The autopsy report you pretend overrides it was produced by a paid MD by the defense. Nice try, sturmdrumpfer, you still lose biggly - the left doesn't need to lie because we have facts on our side. Go cry about it on Dab Forums, fag.

>The autopsy report from Hennepin County Medical Examiner's Office concludes the cause of death was "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression." That conclusion, death due to heart failure, differs from the one reached by an independent examiner hired by the Floyd family; that report listed the cause of death as "asphyxiation from sustained pressure."

>This medical examiner's report does not mention asphyxiation. However, according to prosecutors, in charging documents filed last week, early results "revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation."

Lies are the currency of the left

you mad lol

I’ll appeal to you on terms you understand. You like black people, right? Well now the courts and jails are going to be full of illegals. Court dates for blacks who are citizens will be pushed back. Overcrowded jails will be full. Programs used normally for helping black men reintegrate into society will now have to accommodate these foreigners.

someone dispute this fast

You conveniently failed to list the coroner's conclusion Floyd's death was a homicide, period. Iow, his death was exclusively caused by the excessive force used by the accused officer, likely from the sustained extended and excessive pressure on the throat/neck. In short, since it's so harmless, apply some sustained extended pressure to your own neck. Maybe a handful of sturmdrumpfers will throw you a pity party.

This is entirely about your xenophobia, don't lie.

>Learn the difference between protesters and rioters.
How do people like this even feed themselves?

>if you don't accept illegals you're xenophobic
why are modern day leftists allowed outside of their wage cages?

>Implying your motives are rooted in xenophobia.

It has been done countless times since the event. No amount of evidence will ever prevent you and your brainwashed useful idiot ilk to keep spreading your lies.

wow that sounds bad we should burn down a dozen US city districts and create autonomous zones dictated by domestic terrorists while attacking and killing citizens and police officers that would be the patriotic thing to do

This is where conservatives are now, intellectually speaking
If you talk about the thing they want to talk about, they can't even stay on THEIR OWN TOPIC, they MUST whatabout to something else. ADHD: the political party?

>Yeah sure we killed children and ruined thousands of people by destroying their livelyhoods
>but you guys are there, INTELLECTUALLY
absolutely retarded

>It has been done countless times since the event
sauce

White Americans are about to be replaced in society. We're doomed.

Why the fuck is this being treated like this is going to allow them to get away with it. They'll just end up arrested and sentenced the same way a citizen would.

That is a privilege reserved for citizens. If you're a guest and decide to shit up the place then you should be kicked out.
Either that or executed frankly. If we aren't going to enforce our borders deportation is less than worthless.

Why should the tax payer take care of a non-citizen criminal in the form of food and shelter that a prison provides?

Either way, you're both idiots for taking sides in a fatal conflict between two idiots.

If you two want to take those two fools up as your respective flags of war, and battle it out on a national stage, you're a bigger threat to America than any of these cartels.

Not that whoever the idiot that came up with this OP doesn't need a thorough beating from his father as well.

If you know the illegal is indeed exactly the sort of person Trump claims all illegals are, better to send them back home, than to provide the racists you're fighting against with more fuel. Salt is what they live on, and the Dems keep feeding it to them, as if they are seeds you can stop from growing that way.

I mean, I get letting them slip for minor drug offenses - small amount of possession, punk in dublic, and the like, that'd be fine, but assault and DUI's often result in dead people. We BARELY put up with that from citizens, often putting them away long enough to guarantee they will be career criminals by the time they get out, as, in addition to all the recruitment we let happen in there, it'll be the only way left for them to make a living.

If we had a recidivism rate of better than 50%, maybe you could argue we might be able to "reform these unfortunate individuals", but most Latin American countries have a better recidivism rate than the US. If that sort of person is likely to get the justice they need, they are more likely to get it back where they came from than here - one way, or the other.

If they stay here, it's pretty much a guaranteed downward spiral for them and everyone they come in contact with, or hears the tales of when they do.

Better for them, better for everyone, if they go back to the start.

The right:
Build a wall
The left:
End borders entirely

Like can we just have a functioning immigration system like literally every other country. It's all theater that serve no purpose and effects no change

My brain is incapable of believing anyone could be this delusional so I'm going to believe your just trying to be some le epic 4d chess troll.

So, what does it take to be sent home?
Murders pose no threat to national security, neither do rapes.
Are they safe as long as they don't join ISIS?

Are you unable to read?
>public safety threat

Generally, these convictions would not include drug-based crimes (less serious offenses), simple assault, DUI, money laundering, property crimes, fraud, tax crimes, solicitation, or charges without convictions,

Hope that helps you little shit.

>The left
>End borders entirely
Why is every republican argument based on a false premise?

Most countries can have more than two political parties when it is needed, most USA States actually have written into law benefits for the Republican and Democrat parties in voting processes and they take full advantage of it to scare voters from voting a different party. Not laws the benefit the largest parties, I mean Republican Party and Democrat Party named into the laws.
Americans call it Bipartisan but I call it RepubloDemocratism and it's evident USA children don't education in their laws because they'd run independat and change laws made 120-20 years ago to protect the political powers in charge at the time, even if they agree with most platforms of the bipartisan party.

>Biden opens the door for illegal scammers, assaulters, thieves, and cartels
No, he doesn't.

You're part of the problem. Stop reading into every single post as an attack on "your side" you autist fuck

Chud hands typed this.

Facts are illegals commit less crimes then natives.

So your entire narrative is false and based in xenophobic fear.

you cant keep murderers and rapist out even if they are a extremely small minority when you have no border security. People coming in illegally cannot be vetted. Instead we could fix this immigration system and allow as many good people in as we want and keep drug dealers and criminals out. Seems like a win win.

YEA BLACK PEOPLE ALREADY COMMIT A SHIT LOAD OF CRIME, WHAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH MORE CRIME? LOL1

Nah, you're just a racist and we are seeing cognitive dissonance with you in real time.

>Facts are illegals commit less crimes then blacks
FTFY. And we know.

So if given the chance to to keep an actual murder out of this country you would decline.

There are a lot of offenders both immigrant and domestic that we shouldn't be paying to keep in prison. Stop playing team red vs team blue when it's both sides that want prisons packed full of cheap slave labor.
They're probably scared of how much they'll lose if mary jane gets legalized. Gotta do something about all that ripe product getting deported.

Yup and America will turn into a generic third world shithole.

>b-black people
Smoking weed and jerking off to loli are still crimes even if it's your white hands committing them.

You're pathetic. Life isn't a team sport.

So insecure.

HIT DOG

>inflammatory title to make people confused and angry for the wrong reasons
intentionally misconstruing info like this on the fucking news board should not be allowed

Seethe.

WILL HOLLER

>Headline
>Biden opens the door for illegal scammers, assaulters, thieves, and cartels

>Story
>Generally, these convictions would not include drug-based crimes (less serious offenses), simple assault, DUI, money laundering, property crimes, fraud, tax crimes, solicitation, or charges without convictions
>money laundering, property crimes, fraud, tax crimes, solicitation
Scammers
>simple assault
Assaulters
>property crimes
Theives

Nothing misleading at all

>intentionally misconstruing info like this on the fucking news board should not be allowed
This is been a constant habit of the resident propagandists on this board for years. It's not going to stop until they get banned.

you forgot the part where it says cartels, which isn't mentioned once in the article itself

>you forgot the part where it says cartels
> these convictions would not include drug-based crimes (less serious offenses)
Reading is hard huh?

>drug based crimes (less serious offenses)
very clearly means possession and use, not fucking cartels. last I recalled, being in a cartel isn't considered a "less serious drug offense" in the US

So you take exception to the use of one word? You concede the rest of the post is fine?

What if I told you being anti-illegal immigration is different from being anti-immigration?

>What if I told you being anti-illegal immigration is different from being anti-immigration?
That's not the policy of the current incarnation of the Trump GOP, though. Even pre-covid, the white nationalist Stephen Miller was refusing to even consider political asylum requests from "mud people" (their term not mine) countries, and had reduced H1B visas to a trickle which severely impacted the fish processing industry in the NE. So don't try to play that game, sturmdrumpfer.

Convenient that there is no party option where you can get one without the other, no?

>The left:
>End borders entirely
No one serious or prominent suggests this. Not that you care

It already is, dumb jizzskin, especially in poor states

> illegal scammers, assaulters, thieves, and cartels
As opposed to the legal scammers, assaulters, thieves and cartels

They already run Wall St.