On August 22nd last year, roughly three hundred far-right activists showed up to a protest in downtown Portland. Their ranks included Proud Boys, as well as members of Patriot Coalition and Patriot Prayer. The event was billed as a “Back the Blue” rally in front of the city’s Justice Center, which had been a focal point for months of anti-police brutality demonstrations.
Some among the hundreds of right-wing attendees open-carried firearms, brought shields adorned with QAnon slogans and wielded hand-held weapons. These included batons, baseball bats and bear mace, a particularly volatile form of pepper spray originally designed to protect campers from grizzly bear attacks. Violent clashes with left-wing counter-protesters ensued (one of the authors of this article had his hand broken after being assaulted by a Proud Boy while reporting on the protest).
Alan Swinney, a towering 50-year-old man popular in the crowd of far-right activists was filmed and photographed in the thick of the action that day. Swinney has “Proud Boy” tattooed on his right arm, although the Proud Boys deny he is affiliated with their organization. Video footage shows Swinney barking orders at the crowd while a reporter from Oregon Public Broadcasting tweeted a video he said showed Swinney shooting into the crowd with a paintball gun.
Swinney was later photographed drawing his side arm and pointing it at protesters with his finger visible on the trigger. While police stayed several blocks away, there were multiple injuries in a brawl that went on for more than an hour. Eventually, left-wing counter-protesters assembled and advanced on the far-right crowd, forcing them out of downtown Portland. At the end of it all, one activist found a bodycam on the ground and picked it up.
In an effort to find out who had lost their camera, they downloaded the videos that were saved on the device. These turned out to be videos that appeared to have been filmed by Alan Swinney, identifiable in the footage by his voice, his face, and when associates say his name.
Swinney was not filming on August 22nd, but had been recording during many other rallies, and during conversations with other activists, in the weeks and months prior. These videos, which the individual who found the bodycam subsequently posted to YouTube, appear to show that Swinney and his associates planned for violence in advance, often discussed potential attacks on antifascist demonstrators and spoke about how to fundraise for and distribute weapons.
There are 12 videos in total. While all were uploaded to YouTube in September last year, they have remained unreported on until now.
Swinney is currently incarcerated after being charged as a result of his alleged actions on August 22nd and at an earlier rally on August 15. He has pleaded not guilty to all counts, which include assault, attempted assault and unlawful use of a weapon. Bellingcat reached out to the lawyers representing Swinney to ask for comment on the bodycam videos and the details contained within this article but did not receive a response before publication.
>Attacking Antifa
The first five videos seem to have been recorded by accident, perhaps from within a backpack as evidenced by a black screen and persistent rustling sound. These five videos are dated to 2017. Although given the topics discussed within them, which seem to coincide with events that occurred in 2020, it would appear that stated the date is incorrect. For example, Swinney makes mention of how he dislikes people wearing masks while he and an associate can be heard ordering food at a restaurant in the first video (Video one, 30:27). This appears to be a reference the Covid-19 pandemic.
Lincoln Perry
On later videos, the date appears to have been updated and is set to 2020. Events detailed within these videos also appear to coincide with protests that occurred at this time.
In the first five videos, Swinney can be heard in conversation with a handful of people that it is not possible to clearly identify. The audio appears to have been captured after one of their “flag waving” events and, as the topic of conversation seems to suggest, several days before another such gathering at the Justice Center in Portland. These events generally involve a small group of demonstrators gathering somewhere prominent to wave flags and have previously ended with them getting into fights with counter-protesters.
In Video three, Swinney and his comrades can be heard discussing their plans to handle the counter-protesters they assume will be there.
“Everybody needs to have their cameras rolling in case anyone gets an assault just like yell out ‘got one’…we need to make sure we’ve got assaults on video. I mean, if it’s a crazy assault, then yeah, first, yeah we go first…come on down with a stick,” explains Swinney (Video three, 7:05). “If we’ve got it [an assault] on video and stuff and we know we got it on video and we have several on video then nothing is going to happen because we just show the judge the video. ‘Look, this assault happened, this assault happened, this assault happened. And that’s why she got involved.’” (Video three, 8:33)
Over years of dueling rallies in Portland, far-right protesters have often claimed violent incidents they become involved in are matters of self-defense. Left-wing counter-protesters have argued that the far-right demonstrators usually come with weapons and attack without cause. There appears to be more evidence of the latter in the bodycam footage. In one video Swinney discusses crowd- funding money for bear mace, which he hopes to use on antifascists.
Benjamin Reyes
“I think the best way to do that bear mace is like, to pass them out and whoever needs that bear mace just hand me their license, I’ll pass you out a bear mace. That way whoever’s license I still got at the end of the day owes me some bear mace. It’s like $42 a can. That’s like $500 worth of bear mace. It’s worth every penny when you get to spray Antifa with it,” says Swinney (Video one,19:43), He continues: “Yeah, because I sprayed that one can and that got me ten cans. People like knowing that something they donated for is the reason why those Antifa are laying on the ground and choking. They get a lot of satisfaction knowing they were responsible for that pain. There’s not too many places where you can donate and Antifa will directly feel it.”
In the past, Swinney has run multiple fundraisers for weapons, gear and to pay for travel to different protest events across America in order to confront antiracist and antifascist activists. Swinney has used the funding website Fundly on a few occasions. More recently, he has turned to the pages of “American Wolf,” a far right group based out of Olympia, Washington, that also used Fundly to raise money for accused teenage Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse. The Rittenhouse fundraiser was eventually taken down, and American Wolf have moved to crowdfunding for Rittenhouse on their own website and transferring funds through Paypal.
Swinney’s fundraiser on American Wolf’s website currently sits at nearly $1,500. The items Swinney claims the fundraiser will help purchase include “cameras, helmets, eye protection, vests, shields, personal defense spray, paint markers, and boots: all of which are commonly ruined or stolen in the heat of battle and expensive to replace.” On Parler, a Twitter clone mostly used by members of the far right, Swinney boasted about his “upgrades” ahead of a rally he intended to attend, while picturing a paintball gun and mask, alongside his old helmet.
Landon Peterson
In one video, Swinney appears to discuss a potential plot to lure out counter-demonstrators, perhaps leading to a violent conflict that he believes would justify the use of force.
“We need to scout the area. Next time I’ll wander around a little bit. I’ll hang out there like a worm. Bait. I’ll be out there by myself. They’ll think “ooh he’s out there by himself, let’s go get him!” Swinney then laughs before continuing: “I still got a gun. I still got mace. I still got a pole. [They will] have little round bruises all over their bodies the next morning, poke them with that flagpole,” says Swinney (Video three, 3:32) to a woman who laughs. “If they start shooting my way, they aren’t going to hit me on the first one… I’m gonna return the fire,” he says several minutes later (Video three, 13:29), before referring to a hypothetical headline that would appear after this conflict, saying “three Antifa members killed.”
In Video 10, Swinney can be seen joining a crowd of around thirty right-wing marchers in Seattle, Washington, on the 4th of July. Downtown Seattle is visible in the clip (video geolocated here) while mention is made of the city and the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (renamed the Capitol Hill Organized Protest), which was a protest space created as part of 2020’s Black Lives Matter demonstrations. As the crowd gets closer to counter-protesters, Swinney begins pulling out what appear to be pepper spray canisters and handing them to attendees.
“Y’all got mace?…Before you start hitting them, spray them with this,” says Swinney (Video 10, 9:32) as he hands a can of mace to a man to his left. This individual, who responds that he will handle counter protesters with his fists, appears to have an “88” tattoo on his right arm. The letter “H” is the eighth letter of the alphabet, and 88 signifies”HH,” “Heil Hitler,” in the white power movement.
Michael Williams
“I’d appreciate if y’all get those back to me at the end of this and I’ll hand them out at the next one too,” Swinney says (Video 10, 9:44) before handing another can to a second man.
Directly after this interaction, Swinney is approached by a man who appears to hand a pistol to Swinney’s right, just off camera (Video 10, 10:25). The group then has an altercation with a small number of counter-protesters. This interaction remains non-violent, despite Swinney threatening that counter-demonstrators could get “blasted,” although he does not specify with what (Video 10, 11:50). A few moments later Swinney tells the man who had previously approached him with the gun to “take this shit cause that’s concealed (Video 10, 16:36).” The man then appears to take possession of the same gun just off camera before placing it in the waistband of his jeans. From the footage, it is not entirely clear whether Swinney’s comments about the weapon being concealed related to it being carried on his own person or another individual very close nearby.
The state of Washington, where the situation detailed in this video was captured, recognizes the concealed carry permits of nine other states. It is not clear if Swinney is resident in any of these states, has residency in Washington or whether he had sought a license to carry a concealed weapon while there. We asked the lawyers representing Swinney whether he had been carrying a concealed weapon in Washington or whether he had a right to carry a concealed weapon in the state but did not receive a response before publication.
After police arrive, Swinney approaches two masked people standing nearby with their dog. When one of them holds up her coffee cup to block Swinney’s cell phone camera, he says “You take that lid off and throw that coffee on me I’m gonna blast you with it” (Video 10, 21:36). He then holds up what appears to be a bear spray canister (Video 10, 22:20) so it is visible on video.
Jaxson Rivera
Swinney then readies the canister and holds it in front of the camera as he walks around. He does this again (Video 10, 38:48) as a larger group of counter-demonstrators comes nearby later in their march, and keeps the can in his hand as he argues and points at protesters (Video 11, 5:59).
“I have no problem spraying you with mace. You saying you are gonna slap the shit out of me and walking over here, she’s threatening me,” Swinney says (Video 11, 6:28) as he raises the can at a woman arguing with him in, before a police officer intervenes and Swinney is allowed to walk away.
Paranoia about Antifa has long appeared common in right wing patriot groups and Swinney can be heard discussing the perceived threat on a number of occasions. In Video two, Swinney ruminates about hypothetical “Antifa attack” scenarios (Video two, 35:54), such as how he would defend himself if “Antifa” attacked him while he was camping.
>‘I can talk to all the cops into letting all of us go’ In several of the conversations captured on the tapes, Swinney and his associates make the claim that the police are supportive of them. In Video eight, Swinney appears to lead a group of far-right demonstrations on a night time patrol looking for protesters. They begin with a prayer and then walk from the east side of the city to downtown in search of a Black Lives Matter demonstration.
“My favorite way to go to a rally is to take a Lyft and have them drop you off right at the rally. That’s my favorite way to do it. You just get them to drop you off by the first group of cops,” says Swinney (Video eight, 15:37) while walking.
“Is it bad that I have a felony warrant in Portland?,” one of his entourage asks (Video eight, 4:27), perhaps rhetorically.
“I feel pretty confident I can talk to all the cops into letting all of us go,” says Swinney (Video eight, 5:08).
In an earlier video, Swinney discusses that he thinks police are now more friendly to people in his situation.
Mason Bell
“I just know how things would have been five or six years ago if I had tried walking around on the street with a pistol on my hip. Cops would be all over me six years ago,” says Swinney (Video one, 7:55).
Bellingcat reached out to the Portland Police about the comments Swinney made about lenient police treatment of right wing demonstrators. A representative responded: “All individuals, no matter what affiliation they side with at the demonstrations, are subject to arrest if they break the law.”
In Video 10, Swinney and his colleagues chant “Blue Lives Matter” (Video 10, 17:58) as the police arrive, and they spend time chatting with the officers and commending them on their service. “Cops appreciate the support. They feel comfortable with us,” says Swinney (Video 10, 19:33).
>On the Streets In Video eight, which is listed on the timecode as June 1st, Swinney leads a group of almost a dozen people to enter what they believe to be a left-wing protest space. After beginning with a prayer, the group heads into downtown Portland. One attendee says that he has brought “zip-ties” (Video eight, 25:03), similar to plastic restraints often used by police as an alternative to handcuffs when they are arresting large numbers of people. It is unclear what he intends to use the zip-ties for. Another shows that he is wearing IIIA rated bullet-proof body armor under his clothes. One member says that they had done these sorts of patrols the “last couple of nights” (Video eight, 23:44).
As they get closer to where they believe the protests will be held, one member of the group says “everybody get a partner” (Video 8, 31:18). A few seconds later, that same person then says: “Everybody pick a battle buddy!” (Video 8, 31:24) People pair up in what appears to be a preparation for possible confrontations with protesters.
Parker Wood
This seems to have also been the intention with their 4th of July Seattle protest, where they said they were heading in the direction of the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) with the idea that they might see counter-protesters who they blamed for supposed violence in the area. News site, The Daily Kos, reported that this protest was intended to counter a CHAZ march that Swinney and his crowd believed was going to take place but never did.
The videos also show Swinney confronting left-wing protesters and saying: “I wish the left was as concerned about condoms as they are masks (Video 10, 33:10),” and “fuck off tubby” (Video 10, 35:11) to one nearby counter-demonstrator. He asks a black protester how “long were you a slave” (Video 10, 41:24) and then says “black crime matters, bro” (Video 11, 0:46).
When approached by two black women at the Seattle protest, Swinney deflects an accusation of racism saying: “I got black friends, with me right now!… no, I don’t like all black people. I hate the shitty ones” (Video 11, 2:50).
Alan Swinney was arrested on September 30 for a 12-count indictment issued on September 11, 2020, stemming from his actions from the August 22 rally and at a Black Lives Matter demonstration on August 15. These charges include the pointing a firearm at another person, assault, attempted assault and unlawful use of a weapon. Swinney was also named in a million dollar lawsuit for his role in attacks on protesters on August 22, who report serious injuries, including being hit by bear mace. Swinney has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
Sebastian Wilson
Bellingcat reached out to Alan Swinney’s legal representatives at the Oliveros Law Group but, as of publication, had not received a response.
Nearly $5,000 has been raised for Swinney to cover legal fees. It appears the fundraiser is being headed up by far right activist Dixie Bailey on the “Give Send Go: #1 Free Christian Fundraising Site.”
After being denied release by judge Greg Silver, Swinney is still being held in custody on a reported cash bail of $534,000. Deputy District Attorneys Leslie Wu and Nathan Vasquez argued that “[Swinney’s] willingness repeatedly to attend Portland protests while armed will not suddenly dissipate upon release. Social media posts by Defendant himself display his belief that violence is the appropriate response to the protests occurring in Portland.”
---
tl;dr, one of the leaders of the far right terrorist groups Proud Boys decided to secretly record himself committing crimes, and then lost the camera, which these reporters then got their hands on, and are now publishing their findings. Also he's currently been charged with multiple felonies completely unrelated to whats on these videos.
>Bellingcat is an investigative journalism website that specialises in fact-checking and open-source intelligence. >Bellingcat publishes the findings of both professional and citizen journalist investigations into war zones, human rights abuses, and the criminal underworld. The site's contributors also publish guides to their techniques, as well as case studies.
Brody Carter
>In an effort to find out who had lost their camera, they downloaded the videos that were saved on the device. mkay
Adrian Brown
>Videos dated to 2017 >Nah, we are just going to ignore that and say it was 2020 because of vague context clues
Aaron Fisher
Why would you wear a mask and make reference to the Trump virus in 2017? Also it was only 5 of the videos, so your damage control doesn't even hold up to to that.
Nathan Thomas
>Questioning a single claim in the article means you are running damage control Fuck off. Based on the article he just said he dislikes when people wear masks and how to deal with counter protestors in the videos dated to 2017. This could be in relation to the protests which were becoming increasingly hostile (remember that masks are particularly common among counter protesters who target groups such as Swinney's). Certainly speculative, but not much more than what the article provided as evidence for their assertion of a mislabeled date. If he directly referenced Covid in those videos, why not just say that in the article since it is far more compelling evidence? The later videos are clearly 2020. However, none of this changes the fact that Swinney is still a piece of shit.
Isaiah Harris
You should watch the video for context instead of looking for any excuse to play damage control for a terrorist.
Also this destroys your narrative too. >On later videos, the date appears to have been updated and is set to 2020. Events detailed within these videos also appear to coincide with protests that occurred at this time.
But terrorist apologists like yourself don't care about the facts.
Nathaniel Campbell
I'm uninvolved so far in this conversation but is it unreasonable to believe that there may be multiple videos that span the course of three or four years? Many people were rioting with masks or other face coverings in general after Trump was elected I mean I watched videos of people trashing downtown Berkeley wearing a bunch of face masks in one of the most peaceful protests I've ever seen
Ayden White
Where's the logic of having 5 videos from 2017 and the rest from 2020 given contextual evidence shows that the first 5 most likely have their date mislabeled?
Anthony Lopez
What is the reason they were labeled 2017?
Nathan Jenkins
Probably the date the camera was using at the time was wrong and it got corrected later. It doesn't change the fact that Swinney was discussing things like false flags ops or implied the cops were terrorist sympathizers.
Eli Rodriguez
Sounds like an equally speculative explanation as that given by the others stating that the videos were actually taken in 2017.
>doesn't change the fact Swinney is a piece of shit K. Nobody in this thread was arguing that, unless you consider the user who tried to claim other posters were Swinney supporters just because they were skeptical of a single claim in a massive article.
Colton Gutierrez
Evidence points to the videos being taken in 2020, not 2017. You'll have to provide something more substantial showing the gap. Furthermore, the whole line of questioning is designed to delegitimize the article and evidence against Swinney, so there's the malevolent aspect to this.
Luke Long
Just because you assume malevolence does not make it true. No one has defended Swinney this thread. Even the posts you say argue are malevolent don't claim that the videos are exonerating. In fact, even if they were taken in 2017 and are discussing events such as Charlottesville, they still show Swinney planning violent reprisals against counter protestors. So please, stop being a close minded dumbass who assumes that everyone who isn't 100% lockstep with your line of reasoning must be some enemy agent trying to sabotage you.
>evidence points to the videos being from 2020 You mean the vague references to masks and the presence of other videos from 2020. Sorry, but that just isn't as concrete as you seem to think it is. I'm going to need a little more, such as reference to a specific event which can be verified, such as the 2020 videos.
Blake Clark
>given contextual evidence shows that the first 5 most likely have their date mislabeled? Hmm sounds like your trying really hard Surely you have this contextual evidence? Reminder, face masks were worn in 2017 by antifa all the time as they burned stuff
Daniel Harris
What reason would have to push the issue so hard then if not for malevolence given the subject matter and the damning information of the article and videos?
Jeremiah Turner
First off, that post you linked in no way refutes the article or even makes an attempt to do so. Second, the reason it is being discussed so much is because instead of acknowledging that it is a possibility the videos COULD be from 2017 the guy he is arguing with is being obstinate. Add in the fact that people were being called terrorist sympathizers merely because they thought to question when the article claimed the videos were filmed and it makes more sense why things got tense. The only malevolence I have seen in this thread is from the asshole who implied the website was biased and the person who immediately started accusing people of damage control/being a terrorist sympathizer
Jonathan Gomez
>COULD be from 2017 sure if you're retarded the phrases "Trump virus" and "mask conspiracy" didn't exist yet in 2017 if you're trying to argue that videos clearly referencing topical events are actually from years ago just because they're dated that way, you lack serious critical thinking skills.
Or perhaps your creative writing skills are just overpowering common sense.
Michael Perez
None of what you are saying is in the article or brought up at the cited portion in video 1. Provide a time stamp and video where they discuss this.
Caleb Ross
Retard alert, everyone: What the fuck is your issue? I haven't watched these videos I don't care to. I very reasonably stated and I haven't got a reasonable answer. >"Given contextual evidence" What the fuck are you taking about and why are you so against explaining it you retard I really think you are just a very very dumb person now
Carson Ortiz
We must not underestimate the low intelligence of Americans, where 60% of adults believe in Creationism (pseudoscience) rather than evolution theory. Trump is just a symbol of arrogant, selfish, and poorly foresighted Americans. His supporters, who are easily deceived by conspiracy theories and fake, are victims of inadequate low-level education. What they need is not punishment, exclusion, criticism or neglect, i.e., hatred, but media/science literacy, logical thinking, problem-solving ability, treatment of delusional personality disorder by psychotherapy/counseling, i.e., love. Thanks to political amateur Trump administration, the USA had been ridiculed from all over the world, and its international credibility, leadership, and persuasiveness have been lost. Now is the time to make America great again.in real
"Emotions Self-Responsibility Theory"
Jayden Bailey
a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.
Chase Sullivan
>the proud goys They glow in the dark
Isaac Ramirez
>First off, that post you linked in no way refutes the article or even makes an attempt to do so. That's what makes them insidious, they can't refute the substance so they find other ways to attack it.
>Second, the reason it is being discussed so much is because instead of acknowledging that it is a possibility the videos COULD be from 2017 And the whole point of that line of thought is to attack the credibility of the writers and distract from the substance of the article. Hence the problem.
Owen Sanders
So Dab Forums has gotten to a point where you can't question any details in an article without being misconstrued as having insidious intentions? You do realize that not everyone is a partisan shill, right?
Chase Hughes
There's always a motive behind any questioning, otherwise you'd leave it as is.
Ayden Bennett
And that motive is always malicious?
Jack Thompson
Considering the point is to attack the credibility of the article and not engage in the substance beyond that one point, would you say it's not?
Blake Martin
No. You can question the details of a report without trying to disprove the entire premise. Just because a conclusion is correct, that doesn't mean that all of the steps taken to reach it are infallible. I simply refuse to accept your line of reasoning that we all need to pretend that the article is perfect in every way just because it correctly calls Swinney out as a violent asshole.
Leo Richardson
Except the whole point of questioning details of the report is to cast aspersions on it. The most likely reason you reject the reasoning is because you know this. Given the objective is to ignore what the article is about, also plays into hands of those who want to distract and discredit.
Aiden Hernandez
So you really do believe that because Swinney is a shithead that this report must be 100% absolutely infallible. That to even entertain the idea that there may be something, even something minute and inconsequential, wrong with it is akin to trying to discredit the entire report. I will be blunt, nothing, absolutely nothing, is perfect. When we find imperfections, we shouldn't be forced to ignore them simply because we agree with the conclusion in spite of it. If a simple minded binary view of the world works for you, that is fine but in the real world things are rarely ever that easy.
Hudson Bailey
It's more meant to run interference and distract from the core of the article, which you're doing.
Luis Taylor
By calling Swinney out as being violent and stupid in the past few posts?
Alexander Wood
What you're doing is classic dishonest conservative rhetoric - whenever a story comes out that either makes your side looks bad or makes the other side look good you'll say something like "Well, just remember that we don't know EVERYTHING about this case so like, lets not rush to a conclusion." When someone actually questions what specific piece of information you have an issue with or challenges your vague, purposeful attempt to disengage with the core of the story you'll throw your hands up and go "Woah man I'm just asking question. I'm just saying no story is like 100% accurate you know? Everyone gets stuff wrong." Its the perfect way to completely hand-wave any narrative you don't like without ever specifically articulating why or giving a reason why the information shouldn't be trusted. Vaguely gesturing at hypocrisy, conspiracy or misinformation without ever actually articulating what you're specifically gesturing at is conservative weasel talk 101. Its how you people get away with refusing to engage with information. The only people that can't clearly see what you're doing are just as low IQ as you are.
Blake Cooper
M8, I pretty heavily implied that I agree with the conclusion of the article despite not agreeing with that one piece of evidence. Since you apparently didn't catch this, let me be absolutely clear. Swinney is a violent piece of shit racist who worked with police to antagonize and violently engage with counter protestors. Your entire premise is wrong.
Jeremiah Kelly
>M8, I pretty heavily implied that I agree with the conclusion of the article despite not agreeing with that one piece of evidence You did exactly what I said you did - you vaguely gestured at disagreeing with zero factual evidence to support it. Furthermore, your disagreement doesn't even have any functional relevance to the core of the story. The story is exactly the same and conveys the exact same information with or without your disagreement so the hill you've chosen to die on doesn't even serve any purpose. You're just being dishonest and weasely for absolutely no reason, thus perfectly illustrating my premise.
Julian Martinez
No. It is possible to disagree with you and minor points in the story without having insidious motives. You are not infallible and neither is the article. Get over yourself.
Logan Harris
Yes, you're doing exactly what he's saying. You're basically a concerned troll.
Zachary Davis
So this is proof that the attacks in CHOP were false flags.
