A well-funded cabal controlled the flow of information

According to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, the New York Times did not add the update about the fire extinguisher until sometime on Friday.

washingtonexaminer.com/news/new-york-times-capitol-police-officer-brian-sicknick-fire-extinguisher

The New York Times quietly updated a month-old report about the siege of Congress which perpetuated the idea that U.S. Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick might have died after being struck by a fire extinguisher.

Now affixed to the top of the report, headlined: Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage, is an update note. "New information has emerged regarding the death of the Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick that questions the initial cause of his death provided by officials close to the Capitol Police," the missive states in italic letters.

Capitol Police announced that Sicknick, a 42-year-old who joined the agency in 2008, died at around 9:30 p.m. on Jan. 7, one day after rioters sieged the U.S. Capitol as lawmakers counted electoral votes to affirm President Biden's victory.

"Officer Sicknick was responding to the riots on Wednesday, January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol and was injured while physically engaging with protesters. He returned to his division office and collapsed. He was taken to a local hospital where he succumbed to his injuries," the Capitol Police said in a statement. Capitol Police said Sicknick's death would be investigated by the Metropolitan Police Department’s Homicide Branch, the USCP, and federal partners. Charges have yet to be filed in the case.

Attached: image(7).png (2024x3246, 2.12M)

Other urls found in this thread:

gotquestions.org/how-can-I-be-saved.html
twitter.com/oliver_drk/status/1361410199593115655
web.archive.org/web/20210114175856/https://www.npr.org/sections/insurrection-at-the-capitol/2021/01/07/954333542/police-confirm-death-of-officer-injured-during-attack-on-capitol
gephardtdaily.com/national-international/update-capitol-police-dept-confirms-officers-death-68-now-charged-in-d-c-riot-mayor-calls-for-terrorism-investigation/
thehill.com/homenews/news/533274-Capitol-Police-say-reports-of-officer's-death-are-wrong-
wxow.com/2021/01/07/u-s-capitol-police-officer-on-life-support-following-riot/
youtube.com/watch?v=f3uRFtVwTvE
mediabiasfactcheck.com/politifact/
cbsnews.com/news/trump-impeachment-trial-new-video-evidence-capitol-attack-senators-reaction/
heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/sanford2.png
duckduckgo.com/?q=Robert Sanford
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The next day, the New York Times reported Sicknick "was struck by a fire extinguisher," citing two law enforcement officials, prompting other news outlets to echo this reporting. The following week, a retired Pennsylvania fireman, Robert Sanford, 55, was arrested and charged with assaulting law enforcement. Sanford was caught on video and accused of throwing a fire extinguisher at police, but he was not suspected in the death of Sicknick.

In recent days, CNN reported that investigators have determined that initial reports about Sicknick being hit with a fire extinguisher are not true and that medical examiners "did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma" as they "struggle to build a murder case" in the officer's death. One leading theory is that Sicknick was sprayed by an irritant such as bear spray and had a fatal reaction. It is not publicly known if Sicknick had a pre-existing condition which could have contributed to his death. Two days after the Capitol riot, ABC News cited "sources familiar with the matter" to report that "authorities believe Sicknick's death was driven by a medical condition."


The way the report appeared as of Sunday evening said the fire extinguisher theory was in dispute: "Law enforcement officials initially said Mr. Sicknick was struck with a fire extinguisher, but weeks later, police sources and investigators were at odds over whether he was hit. Medical experts have said he did not die of blunt force trauma, according to one law enforcement official."

...

This was preceded by a separate New York Times report on Thursday, which added: "Investigators have found little evidence to back up the attack with the fire extinguisher as the cause of death, the official said. Instead, they increasingly suspect that a factor was Officer Sicknick being sprayed in the face by some sort of irritant, like mace or bear spray, the law enforcement official said." That report also states this development "has complicated efforts to arrest suspects in Officer Sicknick’s death, as both the police and rioters used spray in the siege. It is difficult to prove who sprayed irritant on Officer Sicknick."

The Washington Examiner reached out to the New York Times for comment.

Sicknick's eldest brother, Ken Sicknick, told ProPublica last month that Brian Sicknick had texted the family hours after the siege to say he was pepper-sprayed but doing Okay. “He texted me last night and said, ‘I got pepper-sprayed twice,’ and he was in good shape,” Ken Sicknick recounted. “Apparently he collapsed in the Capitol and they resuscitated him using CPR.” He went on to blame the "political climate" for getting his brother killed.

"Many details regarding Wednesday's events and the direct causes of Brian's injuries remain unknown, and our family asks the public and the press to respect our wishes in not making Brian's passing a political issue," Ken Sicknick told Fox News a couple days after his brother's death.

Brian Sicknick received the rare tribute of lying in honor in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda, where his casket was visited by President Biden, and Sicknick's cremated remains were sent to Arlington National Cemetery to be laid to rest.

Several others died amid the chaos of the Capitol riot. Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran and Trump supporter, was shot and killed by a Capitol Police officer while she attempted to climb through a window into the Speaker's Lobby. Three others died from “medical emergencies," according to officials. And two other officers who responded to the siege, one from Capitol Police and another from MPD, died by suicide, local police said.

A federal homicide investigation was quickly opened into Sicknick's death in early January, and acting U.S. Attorney Michael Sherwin, the federal prosecutor leading the Capitol riots investigation, said “specialized teams” were still investigating the deaths of Sicknick and Babbitt during a Jan. 26 press conference.

“We can't comment on those grand jury investigations at this point, but we're hopeful we're going to be able to have results soon in those cases," Sherwin said. The results of those inquiries have not yet been made public, almost three weeks later. Investigators have also not yet publicly identified a suspect behind who planted pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC the night before the Capitol riot.
Former acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen said the day after Sicknick's death that the officer "succumbed last night to the injuries he suffered defending the U.S. Capitol against the violent mob who stormed it." He added that the Justice Department "will spare no resources in investigating and holding accountable those responsible.”

The House impeached former President Donald Trump last month on a charge of inciting insurrection in connection to the Capitol riot. He was acquitted by the Senate on Saturday, but before that, the National Review's Andrew McCarthy raised concerns about how the House impeachment managers mentioned Sicknick as they made their case against Trump.

In fact, a pretrial memo cited the New York Times's reporting, saying, "The insurrectionists killed a Capitol Police officer by striking him in the head with a fire extinguisher."

"Clearly, if Officer Sicknick died because of something the rioters did, that is a serious matter. If that happened, former President Trump should be accountable, because he was instrumental in arranging the January 6 rally that turned violent, because he stirred up his supporters with provocative rhetoric, and because — as commander in chief of the armed forces — he failed to take action to repel the siege on the Capitol," McCarthy, a former assistant U.S. attorney, wrote in a column published on Thursday.
"But if it did not happen the way the House Democratic impeachment manners have represented that it happened, we should be told that — and be told why such an inflammatory allegation was made in the impeachment article and repeated in the pretrial memo," he added.

The article of impeachment itself alleged that the mob that was "incited" by Trump "unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice President, and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive, and seditious acts."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Thursday she was introducing legislation to pay tribute to the Capitol Police and other law enforcement personnel who protected the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 with the Congressional Gold Medal, including Sicknick. Biden said that "it was nearly two weeks ago that Jill and I paid our respects to Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who laid in honor in the Rotunda after losing his life protecting the Capitol from a riotous, violent mob" in a statement issued after the Senate acquitted Trump.

gotquestions.org/how-can-I-be-saved.html

KONCEAL - Weaponized virus

Well, it seemed like bullshit
The cpd said it was bullshit the day after or so
Then they officially retracted it and said it wasn't bullshit, after several publishers started publishing that it was bullshit. They actually doubled down on it
...aaaaand now its bullshit officially again

But nobody will ever find out that it was bullshit because it won't be aired 24/7 to the populace as they did with the bullshit

>Officer Sicknick was responding to the riots on Wednesday, January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol and was injured while physically engaging with protesters. He returned to his division office and collapsed. He was taken to a local hospital where he succumbed to his injuries,
one week later.
>edit: He was hit by a fire extinguisher.

So... How does this late edit make this story a lie, exactly?

Don't you get it, because his cause of death was misasigned, he wasn't killed at all! Hes still alive! No one killed anyone at the Capitol riots, and because the fire extinguisher claim is false, Trump is president again

I keep forgetting that, in this broken game between left and right media bubbles, some folks think that shooting the messenger is worth more points than shooting the message, simply because the emotional rush is more satisfying.

I really can't make heads or tails out of this spewage. No timeline is given, just histrionics about things that were reported and not reported by various outlets that were never confirmed to begin with. Everyone was reporting that "it was reported that." It's been known since the 06 Jan that the fire extinguisher thing was unconfirmed. The NYT among other outlets) keep updating their stories as they got new reports from different sources.

I have no idea what point this article is making other than "pure fucking chaos was taking place and nobody knew for certain what happened." And very nearly every report noted that it 'was reported' or 'rumored' with no confirmation.

>washingtonexaminer
Ahh. There it is. Infotainment sewage rag for trailer park trash MAGAts. Noted and appropriately filed, along with headlines about "BATBOY SPOTTED AT INSURRECTION EATING ANTIFA FALSE FLAG CRISIS ACTORS!".

>impeachment manners
> "manners"
Quality reporting from a quality "journalism" source. I wonder if they will issue a correction?

And, are they sperging out about the NYT reporting and corrections, or what was presented during the impeachment trial? Or, both, I guess?

Maybe that wasn't a lie meant to influence public perception that you are kvetching about

>I really can't make heads or tails out of this
That's normal for you though

So much damage control
Holy shit
>Article says man is dead, hit with extinguisher
>Publications in Canada interviewed cpd officials and reported that's false
>cpd releases official statement saying it's true
>Medical examiner says it's false
>Day after trial, story is quietly updated
This sort of thing had happened so frequently over the last 2 years with this well-funded cabal that it's retarded

>person hit with a fire extinguisher
>dies a week later rather than on the spot
>conservatives pretend this means everything is a lie an they were always the good guys
yeah, typical hysterical shitflinging conservatives at it again.

>>person hit with a fire extinguisher
Debunked :)

>>dies a week later rather than on the spot
You realize this means, at best, that they were actively saying he died while he was still alive, yes?

>NYT reports information govt. officials release
>later, govt. officials change their story and NYT reports the new information
>National Enquirer level conservative shit rags like the Washington Examiner, and batshit crazy conservative media bobbleheads immediately start screaming it's a conspiracy by the libruhl media to steal American Christian Patriots' precious bodily fluids.
>meanwhile, conservative media intentionally and knowingly "reports" false information 24/7 and only release a correction when they get their bloated, blubbery ass sued
Why are conservatives such lying disingenuous snowflakes?

Can't be worse than the conservative bias of politifact
twitter.com/oliver_drk/status/1361410199593115655

>You realize this means, at best, that they were actively saying he died while he was still alive, yes?
This literally happened.
It was initially reported he was dead by major US publications.
A few canadian/foriegn outlets (and I believe retuers as well) interviewed a CPD official who denied he had died, he said that was inaccurate
>they were reporting he was dead, before he had died, and began doing so immediately after the riots
>not to mention the false cause of death
>web.archive.org/web/20210114175856/https://www.npr.org/sections/insurrection-at-the-capitol/2021/01/07/954333542/police-confirm-death-of-officer-injured-during-attack-on-capitol
>JAN 14 archive - The confirmation follows an earlier, premature report that the officer had died, which NPR incorrectly reported based on information from a well-placed source.
>gephardtdaily.com/national-international/update-capitol-police-dept-confirms-officers-death-68-now-charged-in-d-c-riot-mayor-calls-for-terrorism-investigation/
>Earlier Thursday, Rep. Dean Phillips, R-Minn., wrote on Twitter that he’d been advised that a U.S. Capitol Police officer had died after sustaining injuries during the riot.
>However, U.S. Capitol Police in response said the reports were “not accurate” a few hours before Sicknick died.
>thehill.com/homenews/news/533274-Capitol-Police-say-reports-of-officer's-death-are-wrong-
>wxow.com/2021/01/07/u-s-capitol-police-officer-on-life-support-following-riot/
>WASHINGTON (WKOW) -- A Capitol Police officer remains in critical condition following the riot at the U.S. Capitol building.
>The United States Capitol Police put out a statement correcting an earlier report from CNN that an officer had died.
>"Media reports regarding the death of a United States Capitol Police (USCP) officer are not accurate," the statement said. "Although some officers were injured and hospitalized yesterday, no USCP officers have passed away."

>>NYT reports information govt. officials release
>>later, govt. officials change their story and NYT reports the new information
Gaslighting and propaganda.

The NYT's source was an "anonymous person close to the Police", it was not an official source. There's still no official statement confirming what his cause of death was, just one confirming it was not via fire extinguisher, contrary to what the NYT falsely reported. They falsely reported this on purpose, in order to disseminate political propaganda against political dissidents. There's no magic wand, no combination of left-cult buzzwords you can string together to make this go away.

Why is it that when one of your sacred MSM cows gets caught lying, again, you're immediate reaction everytime is to attack the people exposing their lies? Are they paying you? Or do you honestly do it for free?

This is how conservatives operate. They ask you to be unreasonably specific either to sea lion or to nitpick on a minute detail to say you're who argument is discredited.
As you said, getting the facts rights about the cop Trump's terrorists murdered means he somehow isn't murdered by Trump terrorists.
It just shows there's no depths they won't stoop to.

lmfao politifact conservative bias? go kill yourself

>They falsely reported this on purpose, in order to disseminate political propaganda against political dissidents
Where did you get that information, from one of "your well placed sources," aka rightwing bobblehead echo chambers? At least MSM issues corrections when called out whereas rightwing media never does (see the reporting of Trump's 30,000+ lies as facts and truth for 4 years) unless they get their bloated asses sued.

>conservative bias of politifact
The fuck?

Who still buy and believe in new york post in 2021? Come on, look at who owns and control 99% of the media and realize its all lies and the same big media corporations behind pushing what favours them.

>samefagging this hard

believe you me, there is one retard on this board who kvetches 10x louder than everyone else.

yeah, this guy gets it >Who still buy and believe in new york post in 2021? Come on, look at who owns and control 99% of the media and realize its all lies and the same big media corporations behind pushing what favours them.
hey man, its no secret, they dont even try to hide it anymore, they just propagandize it as a good thing and shovel it down their follower's throats
>a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.

KONCEAL FT. DUBFLOW - Revolution
youtube.com/watch?v=f3uRFtVwTvE

>politifact
>conservative bias

Imagine living with this level of delusion.

i want to believe he is paid, but i dont think that is the case

>The NYT's source was an "anonymous person close to the Police", it was not an official source.
wait
wait
wait
wait
hold up
hold the phone
hold on

you mean: Anonymous sources arent reliable because they are not official sources?

please reword your first sentence, please for the love of god reword it, i dont think you meant that

>Say Trump kept his promise to gut social security ONLY because Congress stopped him from gutting it.
>Say Biden is lying about there not being a national plan when Trump's plan was to have the states fend for themselves.
Clear conservative bias.

>This sort of thing had happened so frequently over the last 2 years
Uh huh. Hundreds of thousands of times. Probably millions, like the hundreds of millions of fraud ballots stolen from the Orange Heinous Nothing is real. Only Q knows the Truth.

Qultists need to smoke more QOPIUM. Eventually it will start to make sense. Q says so. It has to be True.

>Be cop
>use pepper indescriminatly on protestors
>Get hit with pepper spray once
>Die

The fluoride is 4 Reals,. I know. They killed me with it.

But, I listened to QAnon and I got better. True story.

I mean at the end of the day he still died from injuries sustained from the rioters so, how the hell does this help their case?

The insurrectionists showed up with cases of bear spray and started using it indiscriminately. There was video that they broadcast on social media while bragging about it.

It's illegal to use bear spray on humans. There are reasons why, especially including adverse health effects, such as death.

I did some searching it's not illegal to have or use for self defense but using it to assault someone is assault obviously. It's actually less concentrated than normal pepper spray as it's purpose is deterrence not incapacitation.

There really is fluoride in the water supply though. Supposedly it's for oral health.

Yeah and there's mercury in your vaccines. Just because it contains something potentially bad doesn't mean it's a harmful thing. Sunlight can cause cancer but you don't see people refusing to go out. Fucks sake, most people use fluoride toothpaste.

I said it was for oral health. You were the one acting like fluoride being in the water was some wild conspiracy theory.

>Clear conservative bias.
a wild fact appears and blocks your path
>mediabiasfactcheck.com/politifact/
>LEAST BIASED
>Overall, this update reveals a slight leftward shift in Politifact’s fact-checking selection, but not enough to move them from the least biased category.
>Detailed Report
>Factual Reporting: HIGH

it appears you are sticking out like a sore thumb again

The facts checks disagree.

oh, well the tone made me think you were trying to push some bullshit ("SUPPOSEDLY its for oral health")

A lot of people seem to think that just because something unusual-sounding is in something automatically means its a conspiracy to poison them.

A lie is still a lie, no matter how much the liars say it isn't...until it is, and can't be debunked by feelings over facts. January 6th wasn't an insurrection, it was the last gasp of American democracy before the media narrative buried freedom in the Swamp.

>The facts checks disagree.
I have no idea what you are trying to communicate.
Have the facts been checked and they disagree?
Have the fact checkers disagreed?
Have the (twitter) factual check(marks) disagreed?

>A lie is still a lie, no matter how much the liars say it isn't...until it is, and can't be debunked by feelings over facts. January 6th wasn't an insurrection, it was the last gasp of American democracy before the media narrative buried freedom in the Swamp.
democracy dies in darkness, as they say

Are you really going to say Trump kept a campaign promise not to cut social security because his attempts to cut it were thwarted?

can you not read? are you ESL? what the fuck are you talking about

>died from injuries sustained from the rioters
That's false news and not consistent with the medical report.
>did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma
Please stick to facts while posting.

kill yourself

How does this change the fact he was killed by a rioter?

Do you think the security video shows Pence banging him over the head with a fire extinguisher or some shit?

The murder weapon is not material to the story, at best, you'll find it was something a rioter brought with them, rather than something picked up at the scene, promoting Murder 2 to Murder 1.

He likely died from an allergic reaction to all the pepper spray in the air, maybe, it's really still not totally clear. That spray could have come from one of his colleagues. The fact is nobody knows, and it's a bad idea to lay blame of murder on a group without strong evidence. There is a reason why the court system requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

>How does this change the fact he was killed by a rioter
Was he?
Tell us what killed him

Probably suicide by gunshot to back of head after democrats realized he wasn't dead in Thursday, after they already pushed out their propoganda claiming he was not only dead but he was murdered with a fire extinguisher

>How does this change the fact he was killed by a rioter?
Because he wasn't killed by a rioter. The fire extinguisher story was fake, his cause of death happened a week later.

My guess is, like most cops, he was probably a fatbody and had heart issues from years of stuffing donuts in his face.

>Do you think the security video shows Pence banging him over the head with a fire extinguisher or some shit?
There's no security footage of anyone hitting anyone over the head with a fire extinguisher, or anything else. There's no footage of this cop being assaulting.
If there was, we would have seen it.

Everyone in that building had a camera rolling, start to finish. How is it they managed to catch security shooting a rioter but somehow managed to miss someone beating a cop to death with a fire extinguisher? Doesn't follow, does it?

>Everyone in that building had a camera rolling, start to finish. How is it they managed to catch security shooting a rioter but somehow managed to miss someone beating a cop to death with a fire extinguisher? Doesn't follow, does it?
In sure that Trump caused it to be this way with his infinity gauntlet he uses for supporting the fine white supremacists from Charlottesville that he financially supports using a small loan from his father if $10 trillions, which he hid in his tax returns

yes. magically, in the chaos everyone should have been able to efficiently record everything from every angle
but also coincidentally they spent most of that time pointing the camera at themselves to deliver some sorta speech to their "online crowd"

its almost like they were a bunch of morons bragging rather than actually trying to document anything other than their feelings of triumph

interesting thread, mostly confirmation bias, but interesting

>yes. magically, in the chaos everyone should have been able to efficiently record everything from every angle
Thats literally what happened you faggot. How many videos and selfies were posted that day? Hundreds, from hundreds of angles. Every notable event mentioned, that happened in that building during the incident, was on camera publicly in some form or another.

Except, of course, the debunked fire extinguisher incident.

I'm pretty certain that Trump used a small loan of $1trillion from his father to hide the recording of that incident.
I'd heard that when somebody was going to publish it online Trump's lawyers rushed over to their house in Iron Man suits and paid off their mortgages in return for getting that video

Holy dick OP that image tho

Well shit.
How often does this happen in the US?

How would they record that when they were too busy ganging up in a crowd and bashing him to death.

Hell, even if it wasn't a fire extinguisher, the officer still died from injuries from the riot. They're still guilty.

>ell, even if it wasn't a fire extinguisher, the officer still died from injuries from the riot
did he? Are you sure?

Are you asking if he died because there's an entire funeral to prove you wrong.

Answer the question.

>he died from his injuries!
>he died
lol, anyone else note the slight pivot there?

user I'm asking if you think the officer never died at all, because that' the way your post makes it fucking look. Obviously he died from injuries from the riot, that's why I didn't have to mention it a second time fuckwit.

Did he die from his injuries from the riot? Are you sure about that?
>Check the catalogue

Are you retarded? He died of a stroke not caused by the riot.

The delusion is so fucking real holy shit. Sicknick died after he collapsed after responding to the riot, that is the official report of what happened to him. Where the fuck is this stroke nonsense coming in from?

You should probably check the catalogue

>Where the fuck is this stroke nonsense coming in from?
Definately not the new York times. It took them around a month to retract their lie about the fire extinguisher.
Just enough time for trump's second trial to end.

But yeah, they knew long before that's not how he died.
I mean shit, they were reporting he was dead 48 hours or so before he died. NPR even mentions this

I'm seeing a mess of conflicting reports saying everything from bear spray to a stroke to physical trauma. Hell, even the report of the family being told of a stroke doesn't make a colossal amount of sense considering the death is still an open investigation, so it's entirely possible they weren't told the real cause.

I agree with most of this.
Only, the direct cause of death is known, don't fool yourself.
He's dead.
He died in a hospital.
Doctors know why he did and it was due to suicide by gunshot to back of head when the news realized he wasn't dead although his death had already been reported
It's known.
They had no problem reporting on the fire extinguisher.
We just aren't being told now that the trials over, his death doesn't matter anymore.
And the lie is embarrassing, better brushed under the rug

His name was Brian Sicknick

People should at least be disconcerted that NYT reported something unverified as though it were absolutely true, regardless of political views we shouldn't ignore such shoddy and misleading journalism when it has shaped our perception of an event.

*one week later
You forgot some notable details friendo. Not to worry, that seems to be common lately!

>People should at least be disconcerted that NYT reported something unverified as though it were absolutely true, regardless of political views we shouldn't ignore such shoddy and misleading journalism when it has shaped our perception of an event.
And it took them a month to retract false information, when it was immediately reported literally the day after by other outlets that it was not factual information
Purposefully Timed Proganda.
Controlled Information flow.
Pushing Political and Social Agenda.
Don't fool yourself, this was not anything else

This has been happening for years now, and anyone who raises concerns is labelled as a conspiracy theorist.

>This has been happening for years now, and anyone who raises concerns is labelled as a conspiracy theorist.
why isn't the news reporting on that conspiracy they are accused of participating in? Oh wait, they are reporting the conspiracy never happened, that's good.

They sometimes gloat about it, too. CNN accused people of being conspiracy theorists after getting caught lying to avoid a story about an anti-gun, anti-violent-vidya California legislator getting arrested for smuggling assault rifles and rocket launchers to Boko Haram.

Conspiracy confirmed!!! Or maybe you are just a racist hatemonger and the only conspiracy is your circular logic that lets you justify your hate to yourself... hmm not sure which seems more legit.

Dude shut up

Nice way to not contribute anything
Your the meme dog that sits in the burning house saying "I'm okay with this"

They accuse everyone of being conspiracy theorists who don't believe what they tell them to believe

Source? Oh, your rightwing conspiracy theory sites, lol!

Your dumb

Sounds like the normal news cycle. Gotta get those ad clicks in by riling up the populace to hate the "other" side

Source?

WOH
THE MEDIA MONOPOLY LIED?
AND THEN TRIED TO GASLIGHT THE LIE THEY MADE?

TELL ME THAT'S NOT TRUE
I'm still waiting to hear if they found those weapons of mass destruction btw.

Didn't we have a similar story just this week about them manipulating opinion polls?
Yep. here it is.

It seems the mask is just off now. That they'll just edit and change information to be outright lies and propaganda, because they know their silly-putty brained cultists will follow it to the grave. It's little more than a state-run mouthpiece, at this point.

It's also interesting to note that the so-called "Right wing news site" Fox News literally isn't reporting on this, either. Because even if Fox is the away team and New York Times is the Home team, they're still playing a game with one another, and they want to keep it going.

Clockwork, silly-putty brained retard from bunkertranny getting pissy because someone posted a story proving, yet again, that he's an uneducated fuckwit that is actively being lied to.
Easier to scream and lash out than accept that maybe the sources that you're getting your information from are inaccurate after this happens for like the tenth time.

Lay down and die for porky, poorman.
Don't question the Facts™ porky is kind enough to tell you

Interesting to note you won't post your source because you know you'll be buttblasted for posting a conspiracy theory site. But you do you, cultist.

>Because he wasn't killed by a rioter.
Where did this come from?

Except there was, it just hasn't been released yet, as one would normally expect.

Do you expect it to show Pence murdering a cop?

>and it was due to suicide by gunshot to back of head when the news realized he wasn't dead although his death had already been reported
I want you to think about the number of cohorts and witnesses that would be involved in this fantasy chain of events.

Nobody likes cultists, but what source are you insinuating he has?

>Except there was, it just hasn't been released yet, as one would normally expect.
Really? Got a source for that hot take, pal?

>>and it was due to suicide by gunshot to back of head when the news realized he wasn't dead although his death had already been reported
>I want you to think about the number of cohorts and witnesses that would be involved in this fantasy chain of events
WELCOME TO Dab Forums I SEE YOU ARE KNEW HERE

Fair point, think I'd know better after being witness to Cracky-Chan, but I can't resist trying, when there's so much evidence it isn't satire anymore.

Over 100 hours of video evidence going to trial:
cbsnews.com/news/trump-impeachment-trial-new-video-evidence-capitol-attack-senators-reaction/
Likely in there somewhere.

Even if there wasn't, there's no rational reason to doubt that a cop was killed by a rioter, save that, yeah, Dab Forums.

>There's no security footage of anyone hitting anyone over the head with a fire extinguisher, or anything else.
Look up the case of Robert Sanford and prepare to be amazed.

Wow...
heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/sanford2.png
That face could become a meme.

.

>Likely in there somewhere.
This is purely your speculation though you don't have a source
If your teacher asks you to show proof of a step in math you can't just give them an entire fucking textbook and say "I'm sure it's in there somewhere it's a big book"
Lay off the crack pal

>January 15, 2021 at 5:41 am
Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait
Hold the phone
A man got arrested for something that the news retracted and said didn't happen??

I'm going to go out on a limb here and save that somebody combined two different stories into one for the shock value
Man throws extinguisher + cpd officer dies = a lie about a cpd officer being bashed in the head with a fire extinguisher

It would make sense that the officer really was hit with an extinguisher.....
Only that's been retracted by the people who kept pushing it and determined to be false

it looks like someone took two unrelated stories and put them together in what seems like a real case of propaganda an honest mistake

he looks like robert paulson

Have you looked up the case of Robert Sanford, the man being charged for hitting the cop with a fire extinguisher, and the video of him doing it?

This is a case of an honest mistake trying to be spun into propaganda, thinking it somehow changes the only pertinent fact:

A protester killed a cop in the capital building.

This probability wave has long since collapsed. End of line.

But this board seems to full of people that don't understand what grand heroes and villains these ~500 people were. Why they deserve respect for showing the whole nation a fundamental truth:
We have no reason to fear this nation, we could wipe it out in a heartbeat.
It has no reason to fear us, because we never have.

So why does everyone in this whole darn nation, still fear each other?

To be free, we must be free to disagree, yes.

But we also must agree to all do so, responsibly.

>thinking it somehow changes the only pertinent fact:
>A protester killed a cop in the capital building.
Then why has this been retracted as A Fact ©™ by corporate media, that would otherwise love to continue publishing it?

That simple fact has not in anyway been retracted, Joker.

A protester killed a cop in the capital building.

...Well, and a cop killed a protester, at the capital building.

>A protester killed a cop in the capital building
You must have a source for this.
Because this article is about how this was retracted by NY Times

>The New York Times quietly updated a month-old report
Yeah right, tRump junior.
Literally fake news

faggot

>A protester killed a cop in the capital building.
stiiiiil waiting

>I mean at the end of the day he still died from injuries sustained from the rioters so, how the hell does this help their case?
Did he though?
Nobody has yet to substantiate this
What did a rioter do to kill him

Don't argue with shills
These are the same people claiming Trump is a war criminal for putting military near the border to stop literal bus loads of south Americans from illegally entering the country

Read the article, it is not.

The fact that a protester killed a cop in the capital building, was never retracted.

As for source:
duckduckgo.com/?q=Robert Sanford
Pick one.

It's not just liberals acting crazy anymore. Everyone's gone mad and the propaganda is so thick these days that I think it's reasonable to believe that some people have never actually heard any real facts regarding anything political. Troll culture is dividing this country and I think a little sincerity could go a long way.
Misinformation is a problem but it's not fought with censorship it's fought with facts and a little understanding.

Watch the videos . They beat the cops with American flags. Watch he body can footage and then tell me about these peaceful protestors.

>The fact that a protester killed a cop in the capital building, was never retracted.
Yes it was, because the officer didn't allegedly die until a week later. Meaning they were saying he died while he was still alive.

There's zero evidence this happened other than an "anonymous source close to the police department". All the cameras in that building that day, taking pictures/video of everything that happened, yet somehow no one got footage of that or even saw it happen. Weird.

Truer words have never been spoken

Except for the videos, and the photos, and the trial, and it doesn't change the fact that a protestor killed a cop at the capital building. Doesn't much matter which hospital he died in.

The length these people will go to defend terrorists while calling them patriots... not even Republican politicians are daring to say the terrorists who stormed the capital were patriots.

Only the dangerous nut bags who want a violent revolution in order to indulge their gun fetish fantasies.

>Except for the videos, and the photos
[citation needed]
>and the trial
The one who's only evidence was, again, the "anonymous source close to the police"?

>and it doesn't change the fact that a protestor killed a cop at the capital building
Than why didn't he die until a week later? Why did the news falsely report his death while he was still alive?
Where the videos?
Where's the photos?

>Doesn't much matter which hospital he died in.
>killed a cop at the capital building
user...

>Than why didn't he die until a week later? Why did the news falsely report his death while he was still alive?
Cuz someone reported he died in a chaotic situation, instead of just likely to die?

>Where the videos?
>Where's the photos?
duckduckgo.com/?q=Robert Sanford
It's like you didn't even look, seems you have no room to accuse anyone of not doing their research.

>Doesn't much matter which hospital he died in.
>killed a cop at the capital building
If you are shot in a McDonalds, and don't die until a week later in the hospital, you were still killed at McDonalds.