Its High Time Someone told the Woke Crown to Stuff It

>NAAJP
Because of J€w$, we all lose

Kill yourself kike

>This is actually the reason libshits had to try and redefine racism as "muh prejudice + power"
Not try, did. And it's correct. When whites and their systemic racism has had the sole of an iron boot pressed against their throat for centuries, wanting to remove that boot isn't racism - it's a demand for freedom and justice. That's like saying the Indians led by Ghandi were racists for attempting to throw off the yoke of exploitative colonialism. That makes no sense whatsoever. Wheteas the British colonialists were unrepentently racist even towards the Indian bootlickers who worked in lower level administrative posts.

>This is your mind on collectivism

Go google "Compositional fallacy", print out the definition, nail it to a random wall, and then repeatedly bash your head into it until it sinks into your stupid skull how much of a retarded faggot you are.

That requires a lie and I'm not seeing it chief.

not user, but your redefinition of racism is utter bullshit.
If a white person hates mexicans in the US its racist.
If a white person moves to mexico, where mexicans are in control of the power structure its still racist to be prejudiced against mexicans.

If a jap is racist against a black person in japan (and trust me, they are) you expect me to believe that its no longer racist if that jap moves to the congo?

Racism is racism pal. ragardless of what country your in, whos leading who and definately regardless of what skin color you label a power structure with.

people form all ethnicities and all countries over the world have racist people of all strokes.

grow out of your amero-centric views dipshit

Compositional errors in reasoning have nothing to do with dishonesty you literal double digit IQ monkey.

You're either white or black.

Go tell Asians and Latinos that black people can't be racist. Pro-tip, being called a wetback doesn't suddenly become an innocent joke if it's coming from between black teeth.

Oh good god the stupid, it burns. The average ordinary person walking down the street has no control over the political landscape they were likely born into, and therefore holding them responsible for 'muh colonialism' makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Justifying hatred of people based on their perceived group identity is literally the exact same reasoning that leads to the problems caused by racism in the first place. By even trying to do so, you are actually just showing that you don't even understand the philosophical and ethical reason behind why discrimination is wrong. What a fucking idiot. Go back to plebit.

>What most people do not understand is that repugnicons are actually far more stupid than any other religious group, and will fall for the identity politics scam at the drop of a hat. A candidate could be a complete mouthbreathing retard, and by registering as a repugnicon, right-wing Evangelicals will still vote for him. A repugnicon could be so guilty of a armed insurrection and treason against their own country there is literally still unwashed bloodstains on his hands in the courtroom and repugnicons in the jury will say not guilty. This is actually the reason Evangelical sky magic believers had to try and create the strawman of 'liberalism' as "muh atheists + muh gommunists + power" because repugnicons are racist pieces of shit, too stupid to tie their own shoes, and collectivist-minded, tribal troglodytes as fuck and the right must do everything they can to hide these dirty facts.
So. Much. Projection. It's all that Qaren has left.

Marjorie Taylor Greene is in our congress right now, from an 85% white district, and believes Jewish space lasers cause forest fires. Black people are not unique in electing total fucking retards to elect them.

>Black people are not unique in electing total fucking retards to elect them.
Or maybe its just that poor whites and blacks are becoming so jaded and disinterested they either dont care or do it out of spite.

Don't lawsuits have to have an injured party? Who are the NAACP claiming deserves money from Trump and Giuliani?

>Don't lawsuits have to have an injured party? Who are the NAACP claiming deserves money from Trump and Giuliani?
They claim the NAACP deserves money. They have not stated an amount.

jews gonna jew

Then it'll likely be thrown out for lack of standing since the NAACP do not have the voting rights that the KKK Act is meant to protect.

The standing comes from an elected politician, and naacp member.

>The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole.
It doesn't apply at all. Opposing the imposition of oppression and systemic racism by those doing the oppressing has nothing to do with racism. If a group of "Uncle Tom's" joined with those in power to support oppression they would be equally opposed. Conversely, those whites who joined with MLK in seeking justice were not discriminated against by the blacks and in fact were welcomed as fellow social justice warriors.

In the India example, it's a bit different because the anglos in India almost universally despised the Indians they held in bondage so very few joined Ghandis movement for independence. Read some Orwell ("Burmese Days" and various essays) to see first hand accounts of the intense level of hatred anglos had for Indians. The Indians cannot be termed racist for fighting for their freedom against oppression.

If there was a single anglo that did not despise Indians, then it would be racist to hate them for being an anglo. To hold all members of a race accountable for systemic racism is racist. And is doing exactly that. The idea that prejudice is justifiable when such prejudiced beliefs can easily be shown to be false is indefensible. The concept of systemic racism allows people to ignore individual responsibility for racist elements in a society and attribute responsibility for those elements to an entire race. In lieu of identifying racist policies, people take a shortcut to rail against a vaguely defined system in order to push policies that are not in line with the ideas of equality and justice for all.

it's just a coincidence right

The idea of racism having any meaning w/o being incorporated and implemented throughout the institutions of controlling power is absurd. It's of no importance whatsoever because there is no means of enforcement or power behind it. It's like a dog and cat fighting - it effects nothing, whereas the systemic racism effects everything for those it is directed against. To deny systemic racism by the predominantly white power structure for the majority of American history is willful and intentional misdirection and denial of reality, aka gaslighting. Claiming that blacks opposing it and striving for social and economic justice is racism against whites is an even worse absurdity.

If you're going to ignore what I said and regurgitate the same rehearsed bullshit then you may as well not post as at all.

>NAACP
>run entirely by jews
what do blacks think of this jewish organization that "speaks for them"

you're not even making an argument, you're just writing fan fiction. european supremacy hasn't always been a thing, so back when western europe was an underdog, their racism was justified by the same logic, right? what changed since then? are you just going to keep guessing which group is more privileged and malign everyone against them? maybe it would make more sense to forget your preoccupation with skin colour and address the fact that your god forsaken country kills tens of thousands of third worlders every year to fight over resources with russia and china. drone strikes dont discriminate based on race. im tired of hearing americans take the moral high ground. you have no right to take the moral high ground.

Comments about “woke crowd” and all your poor persecution as a conservative mixed with subtle and blatant racism and anti-semitism.

So which is it? Are you racists who think race dictates your behavior? Or is that a stereotype about conservatives that libtards use to discredit and insult the right?

It can’t be both.

Either you are racist or at the very least accept racism as a legit point of view.

Or racism is not what conservatism is about and the left is actually racists who are projecting that onto the right.

But if the latter is correct then why is their so much racism coming from the right mixed in here in this discussion?

>conservatives are one person

Interesting how you call out the compositional fallacy regarding white people in this thread but not the two posts right before it that collectivized Jewish people and black people.
I wonder why this is?? Hmmmm a real head scratcher there, almost like you might have an agenda

Also don't forget that libertarians, federalists, and constitution party are all also one person.

In fact, everyone who doesn't agree with SoCals woke agenda is all one person.

So you agree that the compositional fallacy is bad, since it is wrong to collectivize Jews, blacks, and whites.

You realize that your attempted explanation of how it's not a compositional fallacy, directly contradicts your previous statement right?

By saying

>Conversely, those whites who joined with MLK in seeking justice were not discriminated against by the blacks and in fact were welcomed as fellow social justice warriors.

You are ultimately admitting that not all white people are "guilty" as you claim. Lets say one of these white people that marched with MLK is killed by a black person for being white because the black person assumed he was an "oppressor" based on the color of his skin. This completely blows your rationale out of the water. By rank-applying the concept of "collonialism" to one race, and then claiming the other cannot be discriminatory by that rank application, you ABSOLUTELY ARE committing a BLATANT compositional fallacy.

This is why no one likes you critical race theorists. You people legitimately have the logic and reasoning capabilities of a rabid shrew. The saddest part is you are probably too stupid to even understand why you are objectively wrong, as shown by the fact that you completely contradicted your own reasoning in your attempt to make it stay solvent. Pathetic.

>You are ultimately admitting that not all white people are "guilty" as you claim.
The whites created and maintained the institutions to be directly oppressive against people based solely on skin color for centuries. Did every white support them? No, some actively opposed them. Nevertheless, the white race ultimately bares responsibility for the oppression. Who do you think it was, the boogeyman of the day, the Chinese? Do you think whites weren't responsible for the systemic racism institutionalised through apartheid in South Africa? But you want to try to argue the blacks are racist because they opposed it?
>Lets say one of these white people that marched with MLK is killed by a black person for being white because the black person assumed he was an "oppressor" based on the color of his skin
Stop making ridiculous scenarios. I'm giving real life examples and you want to play games.

>the white race ultimately bares responsibility for the oppression
A race can't bear responsibility, only individuals are responsible for their actions.

Holding an entire group accountable for the actions of a few is literally a textbook example of compositional fallacy.

The same logic was used against the Jews in Nazi Germany, claiming that all Jews are responsible for the actions of a few engaged in usury.

>Stop making ridiculous scenarios. I'm giving real life examples and you want to play games.

It's called reductio ad absurdum and it's a valid form of argument that has been used for centuries.

iep.utm.edu/reductio/

Pushing bad ideas to their logic conclusion is what anyone actually capable of logic and reasoning always does. It's one of the most important tools of reason to detect bad ideas. If your ideology cannot maintain itself in the face situations that push limitis and cause it to contradict itself, then it's subjective bullshit. And that's exactly what critical race theory is: subjective self-contradictory horseshit that fails to maintain solvency when put through real scrutiny.

I'm sorry you got brainwashed by shitty teachers, but the reality is your shit beliefs are very easily debunked using basic reason.

Seethe and dilate, 56%.