>nytimes.com
This what democrats means when they say "common sense gun reform". It is some ridiculous human rights denial like letting cities ban handguns all together and making it so the government can just unilaterally ban certain individuals from owning guns. This is why we do not give the commies another step.
This is also why the filibuster is so important, in Canada the main party rules as a single party state via simple majority. This is what the democrats want for the USA, the ability for Biden to unilaterally deny Americans their rights.
Canada sweeping gun bans
Other urls found in this thread:
dispatch.com
youtube.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
history.com
history.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
armytimes.com
twitter.com
>'murder is a human right' makes another thread
Get fucked fascist, we're coming for you guns. Please fight it, life will be so much better for everyone else when you're gone.
>In Sweeping Weapons Bill, Canada Would Allow Cities to Ban Handguns
>The legislation, building on a ban of military-style weapons issued last year, would also make it easier to revoke gun licenses.
>A customer holding a handgun and her target at an indoor shooting range in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia.Credit...Andy Clark/Reuters
>OTTAWA — Canada would allow its cities to ban handguns as part of federal legislation that expands on a cabinet order issued last year prohibiting “military-style assault weapons” nationally.
>The package of sweeping amendments to gun laws would also make it easier for officials to cancel gun licenses and to allow friends and relatives of gun owners who believe there is potential for violence to ask that weapons be taken away. Other restrictions include making it a crime to modify rifles to increase their capacity.
>The legislation will also expand efforts by police and border officials to limit guns coming from the United States, the source of many illegal weapons in Canada, and increase the criminal penalties for smuggling them.
>The bill, which is expected to be adopted by Parliament, is the latest step in fulfilling promises Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made after more than 20 people were killed in Nova Scotia last year in the deadliest rampage in the country’s history.
>Mr. Trudeau said that the government will also soon introduce a previously promised, voluntary buyback program for the guns on its official list of about 1,500 assault weapons.
>“When it comes to keeping Canadians safe from gun violence, we need more than thoughts and prayers,” Mr. Trudeau told a news conference. “We need concrete action.”
>>'murder is a human right'
Self defense is a human right, you authoritarian piece of shit.
> makes another thread
Oh no, someone is posting news on a news board. Better post 800 more >tRUMP is finished threads
>Get fucked fascist,
I'm not a fascist, I'm not left wing.
>we're coming for you guns. Please fight it, life will be so much better for everyone else when you're gone.
Come and take it bitch boy
>Automatic weapons have long been banned in Canada, where no gun may shoot more than five rounds without reloading. But there is no legal definition of a “military-style assault weapon.” The Royal Canadian Mounted Police evaluates weapons on a model-by-model basis to determine whether they should be on the list.
>Compared to hunting rifles, there are relatively few handguns in Canada and their use has long been heavily restricted. Aside from members of the police, military and other such agencies, handgun users may only fire their weapons at shooting ranges, and the guns must otherwise be stored in locked containers at their homes.
>But any federal effort to ban them would likely encounter intense political opposition, particularly in Western Canada. With his new legislation, Mr. Trudeau appears to be hoping that municipal lawmakers will become his proxy. The new bill will back up any local measures on handguns with federal criminal penalties, including jail time.
>How many major Canadian cities will follow through and impose bans is not immediately clear.
>Soon after Mr. Trudeau spoke, Kennedy Stewart, the mayor of Vancouver, wrote on Twitter that he will propose a measure banning handguns once the federal legislation is approved. And the mayor of Montreal, Valérie Plante, called for a national handgun ban after a 15-year-old girl was killed in a drive-by shooting in the city earlier this month.
>But after long calling for municipal handgun bans, John Tory, the mayor of Toronto, backed down last year and urged the federal government to focus on preventing guns from entering from the United States. On Tuesday, he said in a statement that although the Toronto City Council supported a national ban it will wait for details on how the new federal law could strengthen local prohibitions “and what its impact would be on gun violence.”
>The conservative provincial governments in Alberta and Ontario have said that they oppose municipal limits on handguns, although it is not known if they will block them.
>The legislation introduced on Tuesday failed to satisfy people on either side of the debate. Groups calling for gun control were disappointed, for instance, that the buyback program will not be mandatory, as was the case in New Zealand.
>But Bill Blair, the public safety minister and former police chief in Toronto, said that the program, which was not specifically included in the legislation, will not allow anyone who does not sell their weapons to the government to transfer them to anyone else, even after their death, or use them.
>“We are not targeting law-abiding citizens who own guns to go hunting or for sport shooting,” Mr. Trudeau said. “The measures we’re proposing are concrete and practical,”
>Erin O’Toole, the leader of the Conservative opposition, condemned any further limits on guns.
>“Mr. Trudeau misleads people when he tries to suggest that buying things back from hunters and other Canadians who are law-abiding is somehow going to solve the problem of shooting and criminal gang activity in the big cities,” Mr. O’Toole told reporters
>Other opposition parties are expected to back the new bill, however, allowing it to pass in Parliament.
>A native of Windsor, Ontario, Ian Austen was educated in Toronto and currently lives in Ottawa. He has reported for The Times about Canada for more than a decade. @ianrausten
>come and take it
What are you gonna do? Attack the ATF members just doing their job? Get shot/arrested by police for being a threat?
People like you shouldn't own guns.
>What are you gonna do? Attack the ATF members just doing their job?
The ATF shouldn't exist and anyone who works for it also shouldn't exist
>What are you gonna do? Attack the SS members just doing their job? Get shot/arrested by police for being a threat?
>Jews like you shouldn't own guns.
Just register your guns, they said. You've got nothing to hide if you've done nothing wrong, they said.
>Get fucked fascist, we're coming for you guns.
And If that day comes then I'm coming for your wife and kids.
>What are you gonna do? Attack the ATF members just doing their job?
Nah I ain't getting killed fighting with a SWAT team. I'm happy to live my life like a regular square guy, but if you want to make me a criminal then I might as well put on 2pac and go all out before they get to me. That means anyone who voted for this shit I'm going to come to their server in minecraft.
>People like you shouldn't own guns.
Maybe you're right, because 10 years ago I wouldn't even say some shit like this. But with everything that happened last year watching you fucks get away with so much damage I'm losing my patience with you people.
So do it. Lets accelerate this bitch while I'm still young.
Can’t wait for the civil war. Fuck commies. Come and take it soyboy.
>Get fucked fascist, we're coming for you guns.
user, I have bad news. You're the fascist. We have guns specifically to deal with people like you.
More than guns. Missles, drones, helos, airplanes, tanks, artillery, mortars, etc. The irony of these Rambo wannabes is they wouldn't have a prayers chance in Hell of resisting the strongest military in the world on it's own turf with their popguns. They'd either have to accept total domination and control by an opportunistic global super power like China or Russia assisting them, or be turned into a grease spot.
I'll just call the cops on the ATF.
dispatch.com
>popguns
oh it's you again. No, don't resist the govt. Remember how we spent the last 4 years with people screeching about how trump was a tyrant? People should be able to defend themselves against tyranny. And if these weapons are as ineffective as you claim they are, then you have no reason to ban them.
Nightmare
Assuming none of the military defects and no outside support from Russia, civilians also own those things. Tanks, mortars, artillery, flamethrowers, belt-fed machine guns and even disarmed fighter jets (shouldn't be too hard to put hardpoints back on, crewchief). We do this for FUN.
God I love my state: youtube.com
Then why are you so afraid, faggot?
Just be glad that your on Dab Forums where we can't post the image of the rebuttle to that utter shit tier argument.
I'd type something like it out but I can't be bothered.
don't worry, someone already did.
Listen, you fantastically retarded motherfucker. I'm going to try and explain this so you can understand it.
You cannot control an entire country and its people with tanks, jets, battleships and drones or any of these things that you so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms.
A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship or whatever cannot stand on street corners. And enforce "no assembly" edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband.
None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, flattening and glassing large areas and many people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit.
Police are needed to maintain a police state, boots on the ground. And no matter how many police you have on the ground they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.
BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband and every random homeowner an AR-15 all of that goes out the fucking window because now the police are out numbered and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.
If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency the the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They're all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks and improvised explosives because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.
Your premise is false. Currently only @1/3 of US households own guns. And best estimates are there are only 5-10 million assault rifles out there. You will not have the support of the vast majority of the nation because Joe six pack has a family and kids and he doesn't want his life disrupted so you can keep an arsenal and fantasize about being Rambo. You have no conception of what you would be dealing with in a prolonged insurrection against the US Military on it's home turf protecting the very survival of the US Constitution and Democracy., not the mountains of Afghanistan. It only took a handful of weekend warriors to block your coup attempt to overthrow Democracy and install an Emperor. You have no understanding of logistics, lines of communication, basic sanitation, and hygiene, medical care, while fighting not only a military that will entirely shut those things down for your little band of merry pranksters, but you'll face a hostile populace who wants rid of you as quickly as possible.
And you don't even state what kicks off your little game, the red line so to speak. You say vaguely muh police state but some gun nuts say that exists now. You even think your super secret coms over muh encrypted website haven't already been compromised by beginning crypro analysts assigned that as their 1st task to get their feet wet.
Your estimates of how many insurrectionists you could deploy for long term engagement are wildly inaccurate and further prove you're at the level of an 8 yo given his 1st BB gun who dreams of fending off an attack by troops with it.
>Currently only @1/3 of US households own guns.
admit to owning guns, in a poll, done 10 years ago. Got up to date data? And that would still be well over 100,000,000 people.
>. And best estimates are there are only 5-10 million assault rifles out there.
A. Define "assault rifle"
B. Is that data from the past 5 years?
>You will not have the support of the vast majority of the nation because Joe six pack has a family and kids and he doesn't want his life disrupted so you can keep an arsenal and fantasize about being Rambo.
The vast majority of gun owners aren't turning in their guns, faggot. In anti gun NY only like 5% of people complied with state "assault weapon" registration laws. In anti gun NJ, ZERO people turned in a bump stock or mag above 10 rounds after bans went into effect.
> You have no conception of what you would be dealing with in a prolonged insurrection against the US Military on it's home turf
It's the people's home turf.
>protecting the very survival of the US Constitution and Democracy.,
Wait, are you saying the military will be joining us against the democrats?
>not the mountains of Afghanistan.
You do know how big and diverse in landscape the USA is, right? You Yuros always seem to have an issue with scale when it comes to the physical size of the USA.
>It only took a handful of weekend warriors to block your coup attempt to overthrow Democracy and install an Emperor.
The peaceful protest where no one was armed?
>You have no understanding of logistics, lines of communication, basic sanitation, and hygiene, medical care,
No gun owners were former military or current medical care?
>while fighting not only a military that will entirely shut those things down for your little band of merry pranksters,
They are going to control every single choke point in the USA?
> but you'll face a hostile populace who wants rid of you as quickly as possible.
Citation needed, faggot. Americans hate the government. Maybe subhuman city cucks will be anti freedom, but actual American people will side with the people and against the feds.
>And you don't even state what kicks off your little game, the red line so to speak. You say vaguely muh police state but some gun nuts say that exists now. You even think your super secret coms over muh encrypted website haven't already been compromised by beginning crypro analysts assigned that as their 1st task to get their feet wet.
oh the feds know and see everything and have compromised everything now?
>Your estimates of how many insurrectionists you could deploy for long term engagement are wildly inaccurate and further prove you're at the level of an 8 yo given his 1st BB gun who dreams of fending off an attack by troops with it.
Your lack of understanding of geography or Americans or basic vocabulary shows you to be a yuro faggot
Almost like we should stop wasting money on bombs huh faggot
You shouldn't own guns.
Why? You think your political opponents shouldn't have rights?
No because you're clearly proving yourself too mentally unwell to own a deadly weapon. You seem to be under the impression everyone will join up with you in an armed uprising the moment you take your rifles out. You clearly want nothing more then to be able to kill your own political opponents without having to worry about consequences.
I don't have an issue with what the fuck your political leanings are, but you're too obsessed with the concept of playing vigilante mob to be trusted with even a pistol.
>fascist
Nice bait.
>No because you're clearly proving yourself too mentally unwell to own a deadly weapon.
What is your certification for diagnosing this across the internet based on text? Post some dox faggot.
>I don't have an issue with what the fuck your political leanings are, but you're too obsessed with the concept of playing vigilante mob to be trusted with even a pistol.
If you weren't a no guns yuro fag, you would know it is easier to buy a rifle or shotgun than a pistol in literally every state.
Don't wanna be treated like a fucking idiot don't act like one.
Where are your certs, faggot. You are diagnosing people, let's see some certs. But you don't have any, because you are a European faggot who doesn't even know what an "assault rifle" is.
If I see a man at the local target going on the same rants like you do I'd call the cops. You sound fucking insane so I'm treating you as such.
It's hilarious how psychotic wannabe soldiers (gun owners) think they will have a chance when the government comes to take the guns. Resist and we're just going to drop a bomb on your house, removing you and your inferior family from the gene pool. Hell, maybe we'll use those cool new sword missiles! Eat shit guncels hahahahhaha
100% guaranteed not American if you don't have a range boomer talking to you about fighting the feds every time you go to the range.
Said the brit bong to General Washington
You're pulling a lot of stuff out of your ass and showing how little you know about firearms. Talking about Afghanistan as if the insurgents here would not be on their own home field. Joe Six Pack keeps his guns to protect his family. Bringing up the Capitol while glossing over the fact that an unarmed mob took over the Capitol for almost a day and left because they got bored. Imagine if they were armed? I don't think you understand how fragile the supply lines are in the US. All those National Guard with unarmed rifles sleeping in a parking garage is top tier logistics. Even if there are only 5 million "assault rifles" in the US, there are currently 1.3 Mil active duty service members across all branches. Even if you armed every fucking soldier, marine, sailor, and airman they would be outnumbered almost 5 to one.
I never voted for trump, he was too anti-gun for me in addition to being a shitbag.
Unironically we should stop wasting money on them. Every time we have "collateral damage" in the middle east we just create more terrorists.
Remember all the violence from those open carry protests at state capitols? No? Weird, I thought we all just want to murder people.
take it easy
Why do you retards reply to such obvious trolling? Ignore the shill
If this person is serious let the government protect them (lol they have no obligation to)
>And best estimates are there are only 5-10 million assault rifles out there.
See this is a really interesting point here. So many weapons are classified as assault rifles, even weapons you wouldn't consider to be in this category, the AR-15 is the most popular rifle in the United States... and there's only 5-10 million of them. So all these weapons count as assault weapons or assault rifles, but there's only 10 mil. Hmmmm...
>somehow a pistol is higher on the trustworthiness scale than a rifle
Nogunz detected
Canada's new "assault weapons" list includes RPG's. Gotta pump up that 1500 number.
>You seem to be under the impression everyone will join up with you in an armed uprising the moment you take your rifles out.
Anyone remember Bundy ranch? Didn't we have some /k/ommandos there?
Which troll/shill?
Learn how to use an image board fuckfaced fascist.
I know you gun nuts have never read any history because "it's a dagnabbed, atheist commie libruhl arts thingamujig" but the only prolonged insurrections/revolutions by an indigenous population against their own Government that have been successful involved a desperate economic situation for the vast majority of the people who realise it's that or continued intense suffering. Under stable economic conditions, you will not even get most gun nuts to join your childish game, let alone 99.9% of the population who have full bellies, a warm shelter and a jerb.
>inb4 muh American Revolution
That was a unique situation where ironically the growing economic success of the colony led to the revolution. That coupled with being separated by an ocean from its sovereign which could only be traversed by sailing ships and the fact Britain was itself involved in a war with the French which caused the French to assist the rebels, resulted in success. But most historians agree that w/o the French, the revolution would have failed.
Spend some time reading muh scary history and various treatise on guerilla warfare instead of playing paintball, whacking off to your arsenal of assault rifles and swilling beer and pizza with your butt buddies.
>Canada Would Allow Cities to Ban Handguns
So, exactly the same law already on the Federal nooks in the United States. Each state makes its own rules, and some states allow each city to make it's own rules. Like, Washington DC and New York City gun bans.
How is this Dab Forums ?
>The ATF shouldn't exist and anyone who works for it also shouldn't exist
Place your hands on either side of your keyboard and remain still, user. The party van is one the way.
>assault rifles
No need to read further. (You) have no fucking idea what (You) are sperging on about.
Washington dc got their handgun ban struck down over 10 years ago in the heller decision. NYC does not technically have a hand gun ban. It is illegal for any state or municipality to ban hand guns and had been for a decade this point since mcdonald, comafag.
See you when you resist and become a grease spot, lol!
>GOP: States rights take precedence over the Federal govt.
>except when they hurt muh feefees because I'm a hypocrite snowflake
The party that worships a weirdo bumbling fool as Emperor for Life, everybody!
Are you a literal retard? States do not have the rights to deny Americans their basic human rights/constitutional rights. It says so in the 14th amendment. Its literally been this way for over 100 years. Do you just not understand that states have the right/power over things not in the constitution, but do not have the right to violate things in the constitution?
Communists aren't people.
The revolutionary war was literally started over taxes and the british trying to confiscate guns. But don't worry, I'm sure biden and the Democrats goal is to make Americans starve. That is the goal of communism, death and slavery so the oligarchs can live in castles.
Why do you use the same phrase every time? Is it due to lack of english skills, or because that is the text in the script your bosses handed you?
Based non American shit poster, posting things that haven't been true in over a decade because his country gives him shit info.
There probably were. No one likes to talk about that because the govt ran off when confronted with armed resistance. There are a lot of people determined to not allow a repeat of Waco. Meanwhile, cops mace and shoot rubber bullets at peaceful protestors and these same victims continue to push to disarm citizens.
I know this is a lost cause, but are you implying there isn't sufficient income inequality in America to motivate people? Isn't that a talking point on the left? We watched the politicians stay safe in their bunkers, collecting their salary and in some cases blatantly ignoring their own Covid restrictions for a year now. Meanwhile, they've put millions of people out of work and given them a few dollars to get by on.
>I know this is a lost cause, but are you implying there isn't sufficient income inequality in America to motivate people? Isn't that a talking point on the left? We watched the politicians stay safe in their bunkers, collecting their salary and in some cases blatantly ignoring their own Covid restrictions for a year now. Meanwhile, they've put millions of people out of work and given them a few dollars to get by on.
As I said, although perhaps you're incapable of reading beyond an elementary school level, read history. If you think for an instant the vast majority of Americans are living in conditions that are comparable to the Cubans under Batista, the Chinese under Chiang Kai Shek, the Russians in 1917, the Vietnamese under French colonialism, the Indians under British colonialism, etc., you are a fool.
>the british trying to confiscate guns
Idiot, you know damn well that's false and you just throw it out to act like there's some precedence that fits your gun nut narrative.
>grease spot
Stop eating fast food 6 meals/ day and washing it down wit 4 Big Gulps and I'll change the narrative from grease spot to charcoal ;^)
>Idiot, you know damn well that's false and you just throw it out to act like there's some precedence that fits your gun nut narrative.
Are you retarded or not American? The first battle in the revolutionary war at Lexington and Concord happened because the british troops marched from Boston to Concord to seize the militia's arsenal at concord. Literally the first shot of the revolution was fired by Americans to defend their guns from the british coming to confiscate them.
en.m.wikipedia.org
history.com
Can you stop trying to lie about this and pretend you know American history, chang?
>Stop eating fast food 6 meals/ day and washing it down wit 4 Big Gulps and I'll change the narrative from grease spot to charcoal ;^)
Chang, you've already proven that you arent American and are reading from a script since you didnt know about the battle of lexington and concord.
>comparable to the Cubans under Batista, the Chinese under Chiang Kai Shek, the Russians in 1917, the Vietnamese under French colonialism, the Indians under British colonialism,
Holy shit this is some, Chang tier pro communism shit here. Notice how leftypol bunkerchan tranny chang specifically only cited communist revolutions (and not things like the revolutions in easter europe in the 1980s and 1990s to throw off the chains of communism)
Those "revolutions" you cited occured because thugs like Castro wanted to own slaves and live in a palace.
>So, exactly the same law already on the Federal nooks in the United States.
Really? Tell me more. Which cities outlaw handguns?
>As I said, although perhaps you're incapable of reading beyond an elementary school level, read history.
For some reason I'm getting the impression that you're a britbong, so surely you've heard of this thing called "The Troubles" some decades ago? What were the living conditions for Irish back then? I mean you're such a fucking history expert.
>Idiot, you know damn well that's false and you just throw it out to act like there's some precedence that fits your gun nut narrative.
Yeah remember when I said you were a history expert? I take that back.
>Stop eating fast food 6 meals/ day and washing it down wit 4 Big Gulps
>le burger stereotype
Sorry we don't need to survive on beans and toast.
None, its federally illegal. The fag is talking about how pre-incorperation of the 2nd amendment via the 14th against the states it was possible for states to violate the 2nd amendment as the amendment only applied to the feds as all amendments only applied to the feds prior to the 14th amendment.
Reminder all the democrats on the scotus dissented against heller and McDonald, because they believe states should be allowed to ban guns. That partisan piece of shit, Garland, as a judge ruled that Washington dc's handgun ban was ok. That is why obongo wanted to put him on the scotus and why Mitch and the senate rightly declined the nomination.
>thugs like Castro
Idiot. The revolutions in Eastern Europe were peaceful and at a time when the Soviet block was on the wane. India was peaceful as well, so I can remove that one.
Unfortunately you know nothing of history. After Castro overthrew the corrupt rightwing fascist Batista, he came to the US seeking assistance in rebuilding to a grand welcome by cheering crowds and the US Congress. Nixon, however, always the scumfuck, convinced Eisenhower to reject him and in fact embargo Cuba. Naturally he turned to the Soviets, but he gave the US 1st chance at influencing Cuba's development. Even with those obstacles, when you compare the standard of living under Batista to Castro, It was an infinitely massive improvement, which is why the revolution was a success. And he let the 10% of the exploiting oligarchs like Cruz's fascist father leave if they wanted. Relatively bloodless after Batista's army was BTFO. Don't forget, Cuba only ranks 2 positions below the US in health care.
But by all means keep your glassy eyes and wax filled ears glued to the rightwing echo chambers. You is one of the top 1%, lol!
>Yeah remember when I said you were a history expert? I take that back.
Post source that Britain banning guns was a pretext to the American Revolution faggot, don't spew nonsense if you don't like getting called out.
>you're a bong
You would shit your pants if you knew what State I was from and it ain't on the coast, Billy Bob.
Yeah, that's why so many people leave Cuba as refugees and no one defects to Cuba? That's why cuban Americans hate socialism?
Castro took over Cuba because he wanted to be king and have slaves. Same reason mao took over china, ho chi Minh took over Vietnam, mugabe and Mandela in africa and Lenin in Russia. The point of communism is state enforced chattel slavery to benefit only the oligarchs.
But you are the fag who didn't know that the revolutionary war literally started because the british tried to seize guns in Massachusetts.
Your state must have shit education if you didnt learn about how the ride of Paul revere (and that other dude who did the actual riding and didnt get caught) and the shot heard round the world, and the battle of bunker hill were all caused by the british army going to concord to seize the arsenal there. The first battle of the revolution literally happened as a result of the british trying to confiscate the Patriots' guns.
See
>en.m.wikipedia.org
>history.com
Sorry Billy Bob, that was a military operation to seize an arsenal from an opposing rebel militia force, not a blanket order for Americans to surrender their guns, dumbass. Remember, you aren't a "well regulated militia," because "th-that violates muh infringement wordies 'n such lahk dat!"
t. Slave of the top 1% who licks boot polish
Eat turds, faggot.
>Post source that Britain banning guns was a pretext to the American Revolution faggot, don't spew nonsense if you don't like getting called out.
>en.wikipedia.org
>One week later, on April 14, General Gage received instructions from Secretary of State William Legge, Earl of Dartmouth (dispatched on January 27), to disarm the rebels, who were known to have hidden weapons in Concord, among other locations, and to imprison the rebellion's leaders, especially Samuel Adams and John Hancock. Dartmouth gave Gage considerable discretion in his commands.[3][4] Gage issued orders to Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith to proceed from Boston "with utmost expedition and secrecy to Concord, where you will seize and destroy... all Military stores.... But you will take care that the soldiers do not plunder the inhabitants or hurt private property." Gage did not issue written orders for the arrest of rebel leaders, as he feared doing so might spark an uprising.[5]
Wow that was fucking hard.
Says the fag who supports a system where people are chattel slaves to the 1%
Continue to be mad, human rights denying troon.
>Sorry Billy Bob, that was a military operation to seize an arsenal from an opposing rebel militia force,
Yes, literally the military seizing guns from the American people.
> not a blanket order for Americans to surrender their guns, dumbass.
"Its only a little bit of gun confiscation"
Blow me you crown loyalist. The red coats were literally confiscating guns and that kicked off the revolution
>Remember, you aren't a "well regulated militia," because "th-that violates muh infringement wordies 'n such lahk dat!"
What are you talking about retard? According to the dick act I literally am the militia as I am an abled bodied man between the age of 17 and 45. The militia is the people. Militias are definded as an irregular fighting force and not a standing professional army. Are you upset that heller affirmed women and cripples were also allowed to own guns?
>makes burger stereotypes
>gets called out as a bong
>no I'm totally living in the states
Oh, a MILITARY operation to seize weapons from a rebel army. Yeah, that's gun regulation, sho' nuff. Try harder, you are literally flailing like a duck with a broken wing.
>I literally am the militia
No, you are not. The National Guard and Army Reserve are the well regulated militia. You oth, are a Rambo wannabe too chickenshit to join the militia and you're as well regulated as a cukoo clock with a broken spring.
>The National Guard and Army Reserve are the well regulated militia.
youtube.com
The military seizing weapons from the people is literally gun control, faggot. I also like how as a bong you call them the "rebel army"
>No, you are not. The National Guard and Army Reserve are the well regulated militia.
The dick act states all abled bodied men from 17-45 are in the militia
en.m.wikipedia.org
>You oth, are a Rambo wannabe too chickenshit to join the militia and you're as well regulated as a cukoo clock with a broken spring.
Why would I join a standing army ruled by a tyrant? If I lived in florida and had a based governor I would, but the piece of shit in charge of my state is a human rights denier, so fuck him, I'm not going to be a soldier for him. I'd gladly join up with nasty girls if they were arresting a Democrat governor and bringing him to justice.
>too chickenshit to join the militia
>implying I'm not a veteran
>implying I'm not hardcore enough to join Nasty Girls
>implying NG didn't surrender to the Mexican army in Texas a few years ago
>implying your trolling is above 2/10 effort
Come on limey, you can do better than that. Maybe find an Australian to do your job for you.
>implying I'm not a veteran
Who was ousted as a Section 8 due to rabid gun nuttism, white supremacy and paranoia that everyone is a limey.
>implying I'm not hardcore enough to join Nasty Girls
Idk, nor do I want to know what that perversion would be
>implying NG didn't surrender to the Mexican army in Texas a few years ago
Are you talking about the 2 National Guardsman who were confronted by Mexican soldiers where literally nothing happened since the soldiers followed proper protocols and procedures and everyone continued on their merry way?See, that's why you got Section 8'd. You would have started a major International incident over absolutely nothing, Rambo.
armytimes.com
>killing is so wrong you can't do it to avoid being raped or killed
>i can't wait until you're killed
lol
>Come and take it
They don't. They order jackboots to do that then act like they did something heroic while sitting on the couch.
It's okay, a spring election will likely come and there is no way Trudeau is going to win over O'Toole.
OП ХУЙ
A. >implying dog fuckers are that smart
B. >implying anyone is going to restore Canadian gun rights
No one is taking Canadians' hunting firearms, they're only taking Rambo fantasy penis substitutes. Ironically the majority of Americans support making those human death machines (the developer of the M-16 aka AR-15 in civilian world expressed remorse and regret he was responsible for creating something responsible for more deaths of innocents than the 2 nukes) illegal as well.
>No one is taking Canadians' hunting firearms,
You do know people hunt with AR-15s in the USA all the time?
>they're only taking Rambo fantasy penis substitutes.
Why are you obsessed with cocks?
> Ironically the majority of Americans support making those human death machines
Democrats arent Americans and AR-15s are rarely ever used in crimes or murder
>(the developer of the M-16 aka AR-15 in civilian world expressed remorse and regret he was responsible for creating something responsible for more deaths of innocents than the 2 nukes) illegal as well.
Got any stats showing AR-15s murdered more people than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined or that eugene stoner regretted inventing it? Why do you go on the internet just to lie?
>No one is taking Canadians' hunting firearms, they're only taking Rambo fantasy penis substitutes.
This is the same thing as
>Nobody wants to ban guns. We just want common sense gun reform.
>the developer of the M-16 aka AR-15 in civilian world expressed remorse and regret he was responsible for creating something responsible for more deaths of innocents than the 2 nukes)
I think you're mixing the AR-15 with the Kalashnikov. Intentionally. Because you're trying to troll but it's kinda pathetic. Again find an Australian to do your job. At least they can bring the bants.