I understand if you’re just not interested in seeing the Snyder Cut...

i004514
I don't disagree with any of this, but I still think it's likely to be a more cohesive film than its predecessor.
Of course, I will probably never watch it so who knows.

nobody hates the movie. what's hated is the forced "omg snyder is a genius, movie will be kino" meme

I actually completely disagree, I thought Ragnarok was a fun ride. The plot was pretty weak but I think Hemsworth and Goldblum in particular carried it a lot through their on screen charisma.
The aesthetic was pretty funky, definitely could have benefitted from higher budget set and props though

To be fair, you have to have a high IQ to understand Snyder movies. His art is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of religion and philosophy, not to mention a truly deep knowledge of comics, most of the references will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Superman's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterization - his personal philosophy draws heavily from the gnostic Biblical teachings of Valentinus, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these references, to realize that they're not just fanservice- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Snyder movies truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the depth in Superman's existential catchphrase "Martha", which itself is a cryptic reference to Rand’s Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Snyder's genius unfolds itself on the silver screen. What fools...how I pity them.

And yes, by the way, I DO have a Batman V Superman tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.

Also, I can't see how you think Ragnarok is worse than Captain marvel, which was a real wet fart of a waste of a movie

>fundamentally thinks that superheroes that save people because they want to help others are ethically immoral. He is drawn to the myth of the super special individual, but thinks that super special individual should only ever help themselves and is obligated to leave the rest of the world to die.

This is the most batshit insane nonsense I have ever read.

Clark was was arguing to help people his entire childhood.

His desire to help people was NEVER EVER shown to be in question in these films nor did the film's ever suggest he was wrong for wanting to help people, the point Snyder is making is that sometimes doing the right thing (saving people) can result in personal & non personal dowmsides that are at times worse than if he did nothing at all. The point is showing the concerns about those downsides wearing Clark down.

>But I'd rather you stopped shoving it down our throats and outright demanding that we sing its praises
Who did that?
>the fact that they had to do so many reshoots to get this version workable proves that. But synderbros can't accept that and will spin vast conspiracy theories of double-think to justify how their synder cut obsession was valid all along.
The same people approved the Suicide Squad re-edit wanted this to be more "fun".

kek

Ragnarok has BOTH more flaws and more pros than Captain Marvel.
It has the most numerous flaws of any Mcu film by far.

This the morbid curiosity of the insanity of it will make me watch it too. But at 4 hours I'll probably have it off before 2 if it's anything like the original.