Do you think Nintendo will ever have consequences for how it acted during the Switch era...

No one believes it but that's just the hot new shitposting angle. Most of these people couldn't tell you more than what they Google sky the wii u.

imagine making these threads because you think it'll mean less sales for nintendo

im still buying it

>ee what I mean about priorities, you value the effect over the game and fool yourself into thinking it's been improved when the reality is that its the same game with a new coat of paint.
It's not just a coat of paint. They rebuilt it and everyone can clearly see that it's not a PS3 game.
>Except it did. The exact same in fact aesthetic downgrades and all.
The game did absolutely not have as big of a budget as demon's souls remake
Besides, they are two different games. They have a different scope. If you were to remake NES Mega Man right now, it wouldn't make sense to charge full price for it, for example.
>Have you actually played the original?
no, desu did not play the original (as I've said, I have no interest in playing these games)
Just going from what I've heard. That the game has a similar structure but an art style that fans dislike.
>Yes problem is that when you search for Demon's Souls fair price it comes up with articles of Jim defending the pricing.
I think we're talking about different things here
I'm talking about the fact that demon's souls remake is a full price game (and that there's nothing wrong with it). I think you're talking about the general price increase of games, making "full-price" more expensive - that is not a practice that I approve of and I think games shuldn't have increased price at all
>There's never been a dull prices enhanced port that has caused outrage
I mean, what others are there?
Look at the Mass Effect remaster. 3 critically acclaimed games. Each of them offering dozens of hours of gameplay. And yet you don't see EA selling that shit for 60 dollars/game. Imagine if they did it. Imagine the outrage if they were charging 180 dollars for enhanced ports of the mass effect trilogy
>Except they're two different complaints
They both pertain to the visual aspect of the game, something that people pay special attention to in game trailers and such.

Or when they complained about the censorship forcing NoJ to reign in NoA
Or when they complained about NSO forcing a delay in the roll out until it was significantly improved.
Or when the fans called out Sakurai on his Ridley bullshit to the point where he got into the game

>If Microsoft's fanbase was like Nintendo's, they would've get away with that gold price hike for example
Yeah sure, history really proves you right there.

>50 bucks
>remaster of a game that came out a short time ago (2013-14) with DLC included
Same thing is happening now with say, Control.
There's a difference between porting a fresh game to the next.gen system and porting a 10 year old one. If a Wii U game came out in 2016 and then got ported in 2017, would anyone complain?

Because i backtraced it, and know where it's coming from.

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 10.62K)

Christ user just stop linking to the same post twice.

>>remaster of a game that came out a short time ago (2013-14)
imagine remastering a 1-year old game lmao

No.

Ninfants will buy anything that Nintento shits out its ass. They will line up to feast on the liquid diarrhea fecal matter that falls from its anus with glee and joy. The Ninfant is built to simp for Nintendo, much like Sonybros grovel at the trash that Snoy shits out.

The age of corporate worship and fanboyism is strong as it's ever been. Look at the youtube trailer for Skyward Sword HD and glance at the like / dislike ratio and understand that Ninfants have no standards.

Even if they experience another failure they won't be humbled by it at all.