>The 18-50 bracket votes overwhelmingly Dem. The Republican party survives off of aging boomers, nothing more.
Funny thing about people: they age.
>Trump only got 32% of the Hispanic vote in 2020, worse than Bush (35% and 44%) and only slightly better than McCain (31%). The idea that Hispanics are slowly trending Republican is a complete myth.
(Counting the national average in a system that depends on select regions)
'kay
Also everyone who signed on for it in 2020 won re-election.
>You can start out in Texas. A lot of articles have been written about how Trump did historically well for a Republican in South Texas. In Starr County, for example, Trump lost by a mere 5 points. Four years ago, Trump was defeated by 60 points in this county. This isn’t just non-Hispanic voters changing their mind, as the county is over 95% Hispanic. The shift in Starr and other counties in South Texas was part of what Politico called Trump winning the “Tejano vote” in the state.
>Indeed, this is a big factor to keep in mind: the Hispanic community is diverse, and voters from different backgrounds and ancestry (e.g. Mexico vs. the Dominican Republic) offer differing levels of support to Democrats.
>Yet, despite these differences, the movement toward Trump was fairly consistent across the map.
edition.cnn.com
Remember how many times Nixon failed?
Nixon took the biggest Ls of all time but that didn't stop him. He ended up winn6in the end.
Don't be a delusional faggot.
Trump won.
Interestingly, the last Presidential Election with major election fraud complaints was 1960. Nixon v Kennedy.
Still more white people and Mexicans increasingly support him. Latins respect strong leadership.
>Funny thing about people: they age.
This isn't about age, it's about generations. Look at the 2004 election for example, when Boomers were 40-60. Republicans won all those age brackets but lost 18-30 (non-Boomers). This has continued to be the trend ever since, as boomers age the bracket where Republicans win shifts upwards alongside them. In 2020 Republicans won 50-64 and 65+ (Mostly Boomers) but lost every other age bracket.
>(Counting the national average in a system that depends on select regions)
And yet Trump still performed worse in Texas overall than any Republican since 1996 (a 3-way race). Why are you looking at county averages in a system that depends on whole states?
Nixon in 1968 wasn't an 80 year old man with his own disastrous presidential record to defend. The only reason Trump won in 2016 was because he was able to present himself as an anti-establishment candidate to sway right-leaning Dems disappointed by Obama's performance. He obviously couldn't do that in 2020 now that he had his own 4 year record as president, nor will he be able to do it in 2024.
>And yet Trump still performed worse in Texas overall than any Republican since 1996 (a 3-way race)
You're not considering Trumps losses in the 'burbs, you're also not considering Republicans down ticket performance.
>(Mostly Boomers) but lost every other age bracket.
Because AMERICA is aging
>The U.S. electorate is aging: 52% of registered voters are ages 50 and older, up from 41% in 1996. This shift has occurred in both partisan coalitions. More than half of Republican and GOP-leaning voters (56%) are ages 50 and older, up from 39% in 1996. And among Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters, half are 50 and older, up from 41% in 1996.
>Another way to consider the aging of the electorate is to look at median age. The median age among all registered voters increased from 44 in 1996 to 50 in 2019. It rose from 43 to 52 among Republican registered voters and from 45 to 49 among Democratic registered voters.
>You're not considering Trumps losses in the 'burbs,
And?
>you're also not considering Republicans down ticket performance.
We're talking about Trump's weakness as a candidate and how he has no chance of winning in 2024. The performance of other Republicans is irrelevant except as a comparison to show how uniquely poor Trump did.
>Because AMERICA is aging
What does this have to do with anything? I'm aware boomers are the largest generation and such a significant chunk of the population, that's why Republicans still manage to win some elections. Thankfully they're finally starting to die off. 60 year old gen X'ers will not vote the same way as 60 year old boomers did, just like they didn't vote the same when they were 50 or 40 or 30. Republican electoral success depends on boomers specifically, not old people inherently.
>Nixon in 1968 wasn't an...REEEEEEEE!!!
Just saying it's not impossible retard.